The PAC 10 expansion groundswell

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SteelBlue
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 8189

    #1351
    Originally posted by WashingtonCoug View Post
    When the folks from the Big 12 South move, there will be no more Big 12 at all. Utah most likely takes the spot A&M had. The MWC is left trying to fight over Kansas, KSU and Missouri with ConferenceUSA.
    You've misunderstood my point. Utah fans have gone from the idea of playing USC, Oregon, Cal, Stanford every year to playing against the teams of what will be the former Big 12 South and only meeting the West teams every few years. That's a big switch and I was wondering how Ute fans feel about it.

    Comment

    • Uncle Ted
      The Big 12 money shot.
      • Apr 2010
      • 28853

      #1352
      Originally posted by jay santos View Post
      Utah in a Pac 16 with Texas. BYU left out. Yeah, that could be a death blow.
      Who says that A&M will not follow Texas into the Pac-10 (if that happens) or the Pac-10 will not pick up Kansas instead? How does Utah compare to Kansas, BTW?
      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

      Comment

      • jay santos
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 13652

        #1353
        Originally posted by tooblue View Post
        I've stated before I'm a bit of a Utah college sports bigamist. My team is BYU. It will always be BYU. However I can be objective about Utah. I've always said if they were invited to join the PAC 10 They'd be crazy not to go. Of course that was contingent on the fact that Utah was joining along with Colorado and they would be closely associated with the West coast teams. A PAC 16 changes all of that. Unless somehow Utah ends up in the West division as the expense of UA and AS. If they end up in the up in a PAC 16 east division they effectively become the new Baylor.
        Oregon State, Washington State, ASU, Arizona, and Stanford trade off being last in the Pac, yet we're always losing top recruits to these schools, with the stated reason usually being that they want to play in the Pac. In the Pac 16 west, Utah will have a hard time rising above mid to bottom, but that's not the point.

        Comment

        • cougjunkie
          *Banned*
          • Nov 2008
          • 23223

          #1354
          Nebraska Chancellor says Big12/ Pac 10 merger is a go.

          ESPN reporting that Texas will announce their decision by Monday at the latest.
          *Banned*

          Comment

          • jay santos
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 13652

            #1355
            Originally posted by Ted Nugent View Post
            Who says that A&M will not follow Texas into the Pac-10 (if that happens) or the Pac-10 will not pick up Kansas instead? How does Utah compare to Kansas, BTW?
            I brought this exact point up. Utah to Pac 16 is far from done deal it appears. But in the event it does happen, it would be death blow to BYU.

            Comment

            • jay santos
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 13652

              #1356
              Texas A&M has chance to cement its place as most hated team. Killing Ty Detmer, two NCAA games, and now they have chance to gift wrap Utah to the Pac.

              Comment

              • TheAzzuri
                Junior Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 454

                #1357
                FWIW, and I know that's basically nothing, but I have a close friend who is tapped into the aTm network very closely. He said right now that it could go either way, but that the general feeling is that for all the banter and yelling and screaming, Texas and TAMU are tied at the hip and one won't go anywhere without the other.

                They believe TAMU to the PACX when it's all said and done.

                Comment

                • SteelBlue
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 8189

                  #1358
                  Originally posted by cougjunkie View Post
                  Nebraska Chancellor says Big12/ Pac 10 merger is a go.

                  ESPN reporting that Texas will announce their decision by Monday at the latest.
                  So now we wait and see if A&M stays or goes. Chip just tweeted while I was typing:

                  Big 12 South schools headed for Pac-10 in 2012 caught off guard by Neb move to B10 in 2011

                  Comment

                  • smokymountainrain
                    Impressive Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 22593

                    #1359
                    Originally posted by Ted Nugent View Post
                    Who says that A&M will not follow Texas into the Pac-10 (if that happens) or the Pac-10 will not pick up Kansas instead? How does Utah compare to Kansas, BTW?
                    For one, isn't A&M to the SEC close to being a done deal - again, as with everything else - based on what we're hearing?

                    I have more hope Texas will demand Baylor be included than I do aTm will follow them over.
                    I'm like LeBron James.
                    -mpfunk

                    Comment

                    • tooblue
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 5127

                      #1360
                      Originally posted by jay santos View Post
                      Oregon State, Washington State, ASU, Arizona, and Stanford trade off being last in the Pac, yet we're always losing top recruits to these schools, with the stated reason usually being that they want to play in the Pac. In the Pac 16 west, Utah will have a hard time rising above mid to bottom, but that's not the point.
                      It is the point. The gain for Utah here was the association with the west coast PAC 10 teams. It would've raised the profile of the school academically and been a boon to the University on the whole. Now all of a sudden this is just move for the sake of sports and quite frankly Salt Lake City is still Salt Lake City.

                      Comment

                      • SteelBlue
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 8189

                        #1361
                        Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
                        For one, isn't A&M to the SEC close to being a done deal - again, as with everything else - based on what we're hearing?
                        No, I don't think anyone has gone that far with it.

                        Comment

                        • jay santos
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 13652

                          #1362
                          Originally posted by tooblue View Post
                          It is the point. The gain for Utah here was the association with the west coast PAC 10 teams. It would've raised the profile of the school academically and been a boon to the University on the whole. Now all of a sudden this is just move for the sake of sports and quite frankly Salt Lake City is still Salt Lake City.
                          So the end game is to keep Utah down academically?

                          Comment

                          • DU Ute
                            RIP CUF
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 7393

                            #1363
                            Originally posted by tooblue View Post
                            It is the point. The gain for Utah here was the association with the west coast PAC 10 teams. It would've raised the profile of the school academically and been a boon to the University on the whole. Now all of a sudden this is just move for the sake of sports and quite frankly Salt Lake City is still Salt Lake City.
                            Yeah, this was all just about academics for us. Even if it was Texas academics > BYU academics.
                            "In conclusion, let me give a shout-out to dirty sex. What a great thing it is" - Northwestcoug
                            "And you people wonder why you've had extermination orders issued against you." - landpoke
                            "Can't . . . let . . . foolish statements . . . by . . . BYU fans . . . go . . . unanswered . . . ." - LA Ute

                            Comment

                            • LA Ute
                              Receiver of Memory
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 19512

                              #1364
                              Kansas v. Utah:

                              The State of Kansas has almost 100,000 more people than Utah (KS population 2,881,747 vs. UT 2,784,572) so in terms of TV eyeballs I am not sure there's much difference.

                              Travel is easy to Salt Lake City. There are few, if any, direct flights to Lawrence.

                              Kansas is a legendary basketball power year in and year out. Utah has a great hoops tradition but is a tier below the Jayhawks.

                              In football Utah is simply better and has been for 20 years.

                              Beyond that I can't say. I think it might be a close call for the PAC.
                              “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                              ― W.H. Auden


                              "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                              -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                              "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                              --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                              Comment

                              • smokymountainrain
                                Impressive Member
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 22593

                                #1365
                                Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                                Kansas v. Utah:

                                The State of Kansas has almost 100,000 more people than Utah (KS population 2,881,747 vs. UT 2,784,572) so in terms of TV eyeballs I am not sure there's much difference.

                                Travel is easy to Salt Lake City. There are few, if any, direct flights to Lawrence.

                                Kansas is a legendary basketball power year in and year out. Utah has a great hoops tradition but is a tier below the Jayhawks.

                                In basketball Kansas is simply better and has been for 50 years.

                                In football Utah is simply better and has been for 20 years.

                                Beyond that I can't say. I think it might be a close call for the PAC.
                                Fixed.
                                I'm like LeBron James.
                                -mpfunk

                                Comment

                                Working...