I started a new thread because I don't like the title of the other one, and it's become totally corrupted. This one is about how Pac 10 expansion is growing into a national story. Statman is right (for once). The whole atmosphere around this issue has changed. This is no longer the exclusive province of Bleacher, Block U, and Cougargoard.
Here's a poll in the Oregonian:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/pac10/201..._be_added.html
Lorenzo Romar sounds off on his support for expansion:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...romar_c_1.html
Mike Montgomery weighs in his support:
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports-he...nclick_check=1
Husky football Blog (yes!):
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...yndication=rss
Check this out (what I have been saying for years; I knew it before the Pac 10 thought about it):
The Sacramento Bee:
http://www.sacbee.com/sports/story/2525814.html
ESPN:
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...-consideration
These are just a few examples. The change, the elevation of the dialogue has occurred virtually overnight.
Here's a poll in the Oregonian:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/pac10/201..._be_added.html
Lorenzo Romar sounds off on his support for expansion:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...romar_c_1.html
Mike Montgomery weighs in his support:
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports-he...nclick_check=1
Husky football Blog (yes!):
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...yndication=rss
Check this out (what I have been saying for years; I knew it before the Pac 10 thought about it):
Scott said there is "more intriuge, perhaps'' about expansion from some conference presidents, chancellors and athletic directors due to the fact that other conferences are also again considering expansion (notably, the Big Ten).
But he also said there is no pressure to expand just because others are, and he said that the requirements for schools that would enter the conference haven't changed, saying again that any new entry would have to be the proper fit "academically and culturally'' --- which means, I think you can say safely, no Boise State or BYU or California state school (none of which fit either as research institutions or having the total academic and athletic package. Also, TV market will be important, and not just what a school would add but having it be more than what it would also take away as the percentage of the pie for all schools shrinks with every school that is added).
But he also said there is no pressure to expand just because others are, and he said that the requirements for schools that would enter the conference haven't changed, saying again that any new entry would have to be the proper fit "academically and culturally'' --- which means, I think you can say safely, no Boise State or BYU or California state school (none of which fit either as research institutions or having the total academic and athletic package. Also, TV market will be important, and not just what a school would add but having it be more than what it would also take away as the percentage of the pie for all schools shrinks with every school that is added).
http://www.sacbee.com/sports/story/2525814.html
ESPN:
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...-consideration
These are just a few examples. The change, the elevation of the dialogue has occurred virtually overnight.
Comment