I love how the resident WNBA beat writer has completely refuted a NY Times article with no facts and with no substantive argument. The NY Times isn't the paper of record, Top WNBA hack establishes the record. Do you really refute the larger point of the article? Do you really think they've grossly misrepresented things relating to the relative support of most of the teams.
All you've really established is that you're clueless regarding statistics and that you didn't know most of New Jersey was in the New York market.
All you've really established is that you're clueless regarding statistics and that you didn't know most of New Jersey was in the New York market.


Comment