Originally posted by tooblue
View Post
The PAC 10 expansion groundswell
Collapse
X
-
I think the larger market is a good argument. Higher attendance is also a relevant factor. I don't know what the real numbers are but Utah's attendance is never impressive.Originally posted by Eddie Jones View PostKansas' football program is in a larger market than Utah's and their average attendance is higher. Kansas has a BCS bowl win and is currently performing pretty well in the Big 12 north. If it were me, I'd take the bigger tv market, the higher average football attendance, and the better (top tier) basketball program. But that's just me and I'm pretty sure I'm biased but still the facts stack up in Kansas' favor.
As far as BCS bowl wins, Utah has more and their last is more recent. Utah is performing well in the MWC which has been comparable or better than the Big XII North in recent years.
I also think the Pac-10 has always liked focusing on cultural and scholastic similarities. Utah is probably more culturally and scholastically similar to the Pac-10. Also, Utah both recruits and plays more Pac schools at this point so they are better known to the voting institutions.
Kansas is definitely better from a hoops perspective but that is a two edged sword.
Add in the distance for travel and I think Utah is probably the better addition for the Pac-10. So much so that I'm surprised Kansas is being talked about at all. Now, that equation changes drastically if we are considering 4 Big XII south schools going to the Pac-10. In that case, Kansas gets the nod and Utah is left out. If it is just Colorado joining the Pac, Utah is my bet to accompany them.
Comment
-
-
I think they should switch names with the big 10. But I've not heard another person on the planet say this.Originally posted by Babs View Post12. It's Big 12. Surely the conference can hold together long enough for people to get the name right.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
He also has you on his side. No fair.Originally posted by Babs View PostActually, the only difference seems to be that you're having more success trolling.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Quite silly indeed.Originally posted by myboynoah View PostWhoa. ESPN just took down Chip Brown's Rumor Central report. It no longer exists. I guess they are committed to the Big 4 to the Pac 10 reporting.
We may finally be moving on to the Kansas vs. Utah debate.
Silly Kansas, they don't even know that Utah already has an invitation in hand."The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."
"They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."
"I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."
-Rick Majerus
Comment
-
Ha. When did that ever stop you?Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostIt's especially interesting since NO ONE on the face of the earth is saying what you're saying. NOBODY."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Well, I guess we'll see. I wonder when Chris will decide to stop torturing those 11 schools who are on the edge of their seats drooling over the the unique mix of academic power, BCS-dominating football, and Kansas-like basketball prowess that is Utah, and just accept the invite already.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostCongratulations! You're in good company, I'll say that.At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
-Berry Trammel, 12/3/10
Comment
-
Utah is in and here's why.
Perfect timing; perfect location; good enough resume. They're all alone in the Great Basin among the contenders, they make a great twosome with Colorado, their all around sports are kind of miraculous (for the past six years at least), and academically they are right where they need to be, by any measure (U.S. News, research, whatever), right there with Oregon, Washington State, Kansas, Oklahoma, and better than Oregon State, Kansas State and Oklahoma State by far.
Yes, seredipity. But life is that way. Magic happens!When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
Comment