Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"You Gotta Love It Baby" Official Jazz thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arnovitz had an article today on the seven current coaches most ready for head coaching gigs. Given the size of the Jazz pool I'm guessing most of these guys will be on the radar to some extent.

    Ed Pinckney, Chicago Bulls assistant coach

    Though they’d deign to admit it, some former players feel head coaches can farm out much of the grind that accompanies the position in the NBA. That wouldn't be the case for Pinckney, who has quickly established a reputation as an inexhaustible worker bee.

    As an assistant for Tom Thibodeau, Pinckney has flourished under a serious coach who fetishizes preparation. At the same time, Pinckney has friends all over the game from a lifetime of building up goodwill in basketball as a pro's pro and a teacher.

    “Guys would love to play for him,” an assistant NBA coach says. “Anyone who has been around him knows how hard he works and how much he cares. His players would go through walls for him and have a good time doing it.”

    The Grizzlies brass was deeply impressed by Pinckney when it invited him in twice last summer during a search that ended with longtime assistant Joerger being elevated to the first chair. With his fluency in Thibodeau's defense, pleasant disposition and intuitive understanding of what it means to be a big man in the NBA, Pinckney is a smart bet to see the inside of a conference room again this summer. all this guys will get at least some consideration.
    Quin Snyder, Atlanta Hawks assistant coach

    It seems like eons ago, but there was a time when Snyder was basketball’s boy king. After appearing in two back-to-back Final Fours as Duke’s starting point guard, Snyder earned a JD/MBA from Duke, served as an NBA assistant to Larry Brown and was named associate head coach for the Blue Devils by Mike Krzyzewski -- all by the age of 31.

    Snyder fell from grace after nearly seven tumultuous seasons at Missouri, marred by rumors, allegations and investigations. The experience humbled Snyder, who went from being the most impressive basketball mind of his generation to a cautionary tale. One year after Mizzou, Snyder landed with the Austin Toros before the D-League (then still the NBDL) had any cachet.

    “He was basketball royalty on the fast track,” says a front-office executive. “The next thing you know, he’s in the bus leagues.”

    Snyder’s supporters and critics both speak of a man with an incomparable general and basketball intellect. By all accounts, Snyder has applied his intelligence to rebuild himself as a coach over the past eight years. He stayed in Austin for three seasons, gaining exposure to the Spurs’ organizational culture. He accepted a role as a player development director in Philadelphia and found a mentor in Ettore Messina, who opened up new windows to the game in Europe. Alongside Mike Budenholzer in Atlanta, Snyder continues to expand his knowledge base with a coach who’s particularly good at conveying ideas to players.

    The sense around the league is that if handed a roster of seasoned, cerebral ballplayers who could relate to his analytical instincts, Snyder could thrive as an NBA coach.
    Adrian Griffin, Chicago Bulls assistant coach


    Odd as it seems to pair a couple of Thibodeau bench assistants on a diverse list of seven prospective head coaches, Pinckney and Griffin both attracted heavy mention, usually independent of each other.

    Griffin is not yet 40 -- 39 until July, he's more than 11 years younger than Pinckney -- which means there are a bunch of people in the game who have watched him grow up from youth camps to his stint now as a lead assistant to Thibodeau. Those who have say that, since high school, Griffin has displayed a polished maturity that screams NBA head coach.

    He had barely filed his retirement papers in 2008 when Scott Skiles and the Milwaukee Bucks offered him a job as an assistant. After two seasons with the Bucks, Griffin joined Thibodeau, with whom he’s developed a close relationship. After coaching the Bulls’ summer-league squad, Griffin stuck around Las Vegas to pitch in at Team USA’s minicamp.

    “You combine that kind of professionalism with that kind of mentorship and you’re going to have a good chance to succeed,” a general manager says.

    The result is a coaching prospect who was characterized by one league insider as “a player-friendly Tom Thibodeau.”
    Kevin Ollie, University of Connecticut head coach


    With a few waivers granted for region or diploma, much of the NBA was rooting for UConn the night of the 2014 NCAA title game.

    Ollie was one of the league’s citizen leaders during his 13 seasons as a player, a remarkable length of time for someone with such marginal talent. He was the guy a team keeps around as a graduate assistant and a calming force in the locker room. Now Ollie is a head basketball coach with an NCAA championship to his credit and is a legitimate candidate for openings this spring and summer.

    In a league populated by some real sourpusses, there's surprisingly little debate over Ollie's readiness. To the extent there is skepticism of Ollie, it resides in a predisposition against college basketball as good terroir for NBA head coaches.

    “He’s gotten along with guys at every level -- college, pro, players, coaches,” says an NBA general manager. “He has high character, knows his stuff, and he’s actually won. Does that mean he’ll succeed in the league? Maybe, maybe not. But what more do you need to see?”

    A page at Basketball-Reference may not have as much currency as it used to for head-coaching candidates, but a playing career and a proven track record as a coach is a pretty potent combination.
    Tony Bennett, University of Virginia head coach


    Brad Stevens maintains a high approval rating around the NBA, but the league wants to see a few more case studies before it designates college basketball as safe for fishing. Wherever one may fall on the question of how translatable college coaching is to the pro game, there’s near unanimity that part of the problem has been the NBA’s attraction to NCAA cults of personality.

    “We’re not going to see the sociopathic, I’m-in-charge control freaks,” a team executive says of the next wave of NCAA coaches in the NBA. “It’s going to be the guy who doesn't make it about him, understands basketball philosophy and understands how to build a basketball culture.”

    A profile of Bennett fits this general description. At Virginia, Bennett has built a defense-oriented program that wins with less superstar talent than its counterparts in the ACC. He’s a composed sideline presence who looks the part and during the '90s had a sufficient-sized cup of coffee in the NBA. Though some worry that Bennett's half-court style defies current trends in the NBA, there's little doubt he has the acumen to pull it off.

    “He loves the craft of coaching as a discipline,” the exec says. “And like Brad, he knows it’s about the players.”

    Many around the league like Billy Donovan and Hoiberg as the next two NCAA coaches off the board. If the next college hire goes well and Stevens maintains a positive culture in Boston, then expect to start hearing more about Bennett.
    David Vanterpool, Portland Trail Blazers assistant coach


    It’s rare in the NBA for someone on the fast track toward management to get off and join a much longer line to become an NBA coach. Yet that’s what Vanterpool did when he left the Thunder front office to join Terry Stotts’ staff in Portland.

    Vanterpool was a quick study and likely a future executive in the league, but it tormented him to know there was high-grade basketball development going on in his midst, only it wasn't happening in his department.

    “He has a way with players,” a front-office executive says. “He was a tough overseas player who worked at his game.”

    Vanterpool both played and coached for Messina in Moscow, an affiliation that means something in an increasingly international league. The two-year stint in the Oklahoma City front office is also the kind of interdisciplinary experience valued by shops like San Antonio. Add to all that a penchant for independent thought, a willingness to admit what you don’t know and a reputation as a solid, agreeable person and a young team could have a head coach to grow up with.
    Jim Boylen, San Antonio Spurs assistant coach


    Thanks to the success of Steve Clifford in Charlotte, the nomadic, 50-ish, affable, well-respected grinder has come into fashion. And if you’re looking for a prototype, Boylen might be it.

    Boylen, not to be confused with former Bulls and Bucks head coach Jim Boylan, sat alongside Rudy Tomjanovich for over a decade and was a lead assistant to Tom Izzo. After four rough seasons at the University of Utah -- “The guy hates recruiting, what can you say?” says a Boylen sympathizer -- he landed with Frank Vogel in Indiana, where he restored his rep as a guy who truly loves to get on the floor and work with players and isn't afraid to get his hands dirty with game preparation.

    “He’s been the best guy on almost every staff he’s ever been on,” an NBA general manager says last week prior to Ty Corbin’s departure from Utah. “And the fact that Pop hired him gives him the ultimate stamp of approval.”

    An owner looking for sex appeal won’t want to see a glossy image of Boylen on the cover of a season-ticket appeal packet. But there’s a strong consensus that Boylen is an extremely capable lifer who rarely has trouble connecting with players or peers.
    http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/pos...hing-prospects
    So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by wapiti View Post
      The luxury tax is so punitive that you almost don't want an owner who is willing to go into it. It's pretty rare that heavy luxury tax spending is even helpful. A unique situation like OKC had a few years ago warranted it. They should have gone into the cap and signed Harden.
      Completely agreed. I thought the manner they went about that hurt them.
      Will donate kidney for B12 membership.

      Comment


      • Ante Tomic on Messina:

        He is an excellent coach. The very first time we spoke...he immediately told me that my PT would depend on how much I deserve it during practices, with my attitude and everything else a coach looks at. With Coach Messina you have to be 100% focused just to be in his considerations to play. On the court, he is a great professional; off the court, a lot less demanding."

        Comment


        • Bring in Messina and Tomic!
          So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

          Comment


          • I just looked into my crystal ball. It was Jabari will be a 24 ppg scorer and below average defender, and Wiggins with be a 19 ppg scorer and plus defender (in the ballpark of all-defense). They'll rebound similarly at 7-8 boards per game. Who do you take?
            So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by MarkGrace View Post
              I just looked into my crystal ball. It was Jabari will be a 24 ppg scorer and below average defender, and Wiggins with be a 19 ppg scorer and plus defender (in the ballpark of all-defense). They'll rebound similarly at 7-8 boards per game. Who do you take?
              Is that a joke?
              "Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault

              "Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors

              Comment


              • Originally posted by MarkGrace View Post
                I just looked into my crystal ball. It was Jabari will be a 24 ppg scorer and below average defender, and Wiggins with be a 19 ppg scorer and plus defender (in the ballpark of all-defense). They'll rebound similarly at 7-8 boards per game. Who do you take?
                To me, it depends on the pieces you have around them. If you're Utah, the big question to me is what is Kanter? If Kanter is going to be an 18 ppt scorer (which I still think he can be) but a below average defender, then I think you go with Wiggins. If you're not sold on being able to get that offense from Enes, I think Parker becomes a strong consideration. Jabari also will be a huge hit with the fans in Utah. I think I still lean towards Wiggins, but I don't really think in the scenario you proposed there is a wrong answer.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MarkGrace View Post
                  I just looked into my crystal ball. It was Jabari will be a 24 ppg scorer and below average defender, and Wiggins with be a 19 ppg scorer and plus defender (in the ballpark of all-defense). They'll rebound similarly at 7-8 boards per game. Who do you take?
                  Wiggins. I think today's NBA has shown that having an all-defense perimeter defender can be almost as important to a great team defensive scheme as having a very good defensive big. And when you can pair a good defensive big with a good defensive wing (Hibbert/George, Noah/Butler, Gasol/Allen, Duncan/Leonard) then you have a pretty good shot at being an elite defense. So if you can get that with close to 20 ppg I think you take that.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BGRTHNUMEGO View Post
                    Wiggins. I think today's NBA has shown that having an all-defense perimeter defender can be almost as important to a great team defensive scheme as having a very good defensive big. And when you can pair a good defensive big with a good defensive wing (Hibbert/George, Noah/Butler, Gasol/Allen, Duncan/Leonard) then you have a pretty good shot at being an elite defense. So if you can get that with close to 20 ppg I think you take that.
                    Obviously. A near-elite defender has to stop just 3 shots per game more than a scorer to balance out productivity.
                    "Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault

                    "Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MarkGrace View Post
                      I just looked into my crystal ball. It was Jabari will be a 24 ppg scorer and below average defender, and Wiggins with be a 19 ppg scorer and plus defender (in the ballpark of all-defense). They'll rebound similarly at 7-8 boards per game. Who do you take?
                      If the scoring efficiency is equal, I probably take Wiggins, because I think as the roster is, the Jazz need defense more than they need offense.
                      I'm like LeBron James.
                      -mpfunk

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Blueintheface View Post
                        Is that a joke?
                        No, not at all. 24 ppg is in that range of being an elite scorer in the league. This year 7 guys averaged 24 ppg or more: Durant, Anthony, James, Love, Harden, Griffin, Curry. I think historically, when people just looked at boxscore stats, most would have just jumped on the 24 ppg scorer since measuring defense was a bit more of an amorphous concept. With total court impact becoming more measurable with on/off, Synergy, RPM, etc., it seems people are starting to give more meaningful consideration to defense. So you have great two-way players like George who are increasing their status compared to how they may have been viewed in the past just based on counted numbers. But my consideration is this: how valuable is it to have at least one elite scorer? Not a ton of teams have won it all without at least one on the roster. You could probably point to the C's (though I would guess without looking that Pierce was somewhere in the range of 24 ppg that year), and definitely the Pistons, but there probably aren't a ton.

                        There have been some great teams the last few years that succeeded with a combination of great defense and an offense balanced but lacking an elite scorer. I'm thinking Indy, Memphis, etc. But in the end, does a team have enough firepower to make it all the way through without at least one elite scorer that you can flip the ball to for points and creates opportunities for others because of his presence? Like Sizz said, it's always about pieces, so it was really a question of which type of player (elite scorer, subpar defender; good but not great scorer, great defender) you would work around with those complementary pieces.
                        So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

                        Comment


                        • Is your consideration for which pick only based on which player makes the team better on the floor? Because I have a hard time seeing that be the only concern of the Jazz in making this pick, I think the economics of being a team that isn't going to make the playoffs every year becomes a strong consideration. So does Jabari divide the non-LDS fans from the team or is there a strong enough LDS population to overcome that?
                          Get confident, stupid
                          -landpoke

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by MarkGrace View Post
                            No, not at all. 24 ppg is in that range of being an elite scorer in the league. This year 7 guys averaged 24 ppg or more: Durant, Anthony, James, Love, Harden, Griffin, Curry. I think historically, when people just looked at boxscore stats, most would have just jumped on the 24 ppg scorer since measuring defense was a bit more of an amorphous concept. With total court impact becoming more measurable with on/off, Synergy, RPM, etc., it seems people are starting to give more meaningful consideration to defense. So you have great two-way players like George who are increasing their status compared to how they may have been viewed in the past just based on counted numbers. But my consideration is this: how valuable is it to have at least one elite scorer? Not a ton of teams have won it all without at least one on the roster. You could probably point to the C's (though I would guess without looking that Pierce was somewhere in the range of 24 ppg that year), and definitely the Pistons, but there probably aren't a ton.

                            There have been some great teams the last few years that succeeded with a combination of great defense and an offense balanced but lacking an elite scorer. I'm thinking Indy, Memphis, etc. But in the end, does a team have enough firepower to make it all the way through without at least one elite scorer that you can flip the ball to for points and creates opportunities for others because of his presence? Like Sizz said, it's always about pieces, so it was really a question of which type of player (elite scorer, subpar defender; good but not great scorer, great defender) you would work around with those complementary pieces.
                            Spurs. They were one defensive rebound away from winning it all last year with their top scorer getting 20 ppg.
                            I'm like LeBron James.
                            -mpfunk

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
                              Spurs. They were one defensive rebound away from winning it all last year with their top scorer getting 20 ppg.
                              Yeah I almost included them when I mentioned Indy and Memphis since they were built similarly. They also didn't win it, just like Indy and Memphis, so I just passed them over since Indy and Memphis made the same point. I even though about their last championship team, though off the top of my head I would guess that Duncan was still somewhere in the ballpark of elite scorer at the time.
                              So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                                Is your consideration for which pick only based on which player makes the team better on the floor? Because I have a hard time seeing that be the only concern of the Jazz in making this pick, I think the economics of being a team that isn't going to make the playoffs every year becomes a strong consideration. So does Jabari divide the non-LDS fans from the team or is there a strong enough LDS population to overcome that?
                                Yes, and I would hope that's the only consideration for the Jazz. I think people go to games when a team wins, and that's about the end of story. That's why I always found the Cougarboard arguments about Jimmer on the Jazz to be silly; there's short-term interest in a novelty, but it doesn't sustain. So to me whichever one you think you can build the best team is the one you go with, period. Mine was just a question about which type of player you think you can build a better team around.
                                So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X