President Trump: Making America Great Again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Commando
    Explosivo
    • Feb 2009
    • 20748

    #10276
    Originally posted by tooblue View Post
    Why are people prosecuted for attempting a crime but not actually committing a crime, every day?
    Phew! Good thing that attempted murder didn't go through or you'd expect a little visit from your friendly neighborhood policeman!
    "I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"

    Comment

    • Uncle Ted
      The Big 12 money shot.
      • Apr 2010
      • 28853

      #10277
      Originally posted by Commando View Post
      Call Al Green... let's have another vote!




      Obviously they were playing 'Wheel of Fortune' wrong with the last one. This calls for a new vote.
      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

      Comment

      • tooblue
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 5108

        #10278
        Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
        Call Al Green... let's have another vote!




        Obviously they were playing 'Wheel of Fortune' wrong with the last one. This calls for a new vote.
        You do understand that meme is racist don't you?

        Comment

        • frank ryan
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 12284

          #10279
          Originally posted by BigFatMeanie View Post
          Have you ever considered the possibility that SU is the same SU and it's you that has shifted and thus your perception of him has shifted?
          I just donated to a GOP candidate for governor, so I suppose I'm less partisan. That's a first for me although, I've never voted straight party in my life, but I suspect you have.

          Comment

          • falafel
            loves to talk on things
            • Mar 2009
            • 37896

            #10280
            Originally posted by tooblue View Post
            Why are people prosecuted for attempting a crime but not actually committing a crime, every day?
            Because attempting to commit some crimes is in itself a crime. But that doesn't hold true for all crimes.
            Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

            Dig your own grave, and save!

            "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

            "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

            Comment

            • Northwestcoug
              Cocked and Loaded
              • May 2011
              • 17941

              #10281
              General twitter consensus is that Mueller didn’t...do so well. I haven’t seen any video. Sounds like any serious thought of impeachment is gone now.
              "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
              "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
              - SeattleUte

              Comment

              • BlueK
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 7162

                #10282
                Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                General twitter consensus is that Mueller didn’t...do so well. I haven’t seen any video. Sounds like any serious thought of impeachment is gone now.
                Mueller just said establishing criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard he used for concluding what he did, but it is not the same thing as "no evidence"

                Comment

                • Omaha 680
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 11171

                  #10283
                  Originally posted by Commando View Post
                  Phew! Good thing that attempted murder didn't go through or you'd expect a little visit from your friendly neighborhood policeman!
                  I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure attempted murder is actually a crime not an attempted crime. Is attempted obstruction a crime? (Sincere question)

                  Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • BlueK
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 7162

                    #10284
                    Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                    I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure attempted murder is actually a crime not an attempted crime. Is attempted obstruction a crime? (Sincere question)

                    Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
                    It's against the law, yes. If you take actions with corrupt intent to thwart a law enforcement investigation, it is considered obstruction even if you fail to accomplish everything you're trying to do.

                    Comment

                    • SeattleUte
                      Faith crisis consultant
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 20837

                      #10285
                      Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                      I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure attempted murder is actually a crime not an attempted crime. Is attempted obstruction a crime? (Sincere question)

                      Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
                      Attempted obstruction of justice is not a crime. There has to be an "endeavor".



                      What is an endeavor? The statute says obstruction occurs where "an act" "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice." Was there any bribe or threat here? Was justice influenced, obstructed, or impeded? Muller said he was able to complete his investigation without impediment.



                      The other question is whether if there is no underlying crime--if the alleged obstructer knows he's innocent--he should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. Here, apparently, Trump was not without reason for expressing contempt at this proceeding.

                      Apparently, the anti-intellectual left hasn't bothered even to research these issues; at least the CS left hasn't.
                      Last edited by SeattleUte; 07-24-2019, 12:23 PM.
                      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                      --Jonathan Swift

                      Comment

                      • SeattleUte
                        Faith crisis consultant
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 20837

                        #10286
                        Originally posted by BlueK View Post
                        It's against the law, yes. If you take actions with corrupt intent to thwart a law enforcement investigation, it is considered obstruction even if you fail to accomplish everything you're trying to do.
                        Attempted obstruction is not a crime. It's just not. I swear, the left is a religion. It is.
                        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                        --Jonathan Swift

                        Comment

                        • Uncle Ted
                          The Big 12 money shot.
                          • Apr 2010
                          • 28853

                          #10287
                          Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                          Attempted obstruction of justice is not a crime. There has to be an "endeavor".



                          What is an endeavor? The statute says obstruction occurs where "an act" "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice." Was there any bribe or threat here? Was justice influenced, obstructed, or impeded? Muller said he was able to complete his investigation without impediment.



                          The other question is whether if there is no underlying crime--if the alleged obstructer knows he's innocent--he should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. Here, apparently, Trump was not without reason for expressing contempt at this proceeding.

                          Apparently, the anti-intellectual left hasn't bothered even to research these issues; at least the CS left hasn't.
                          Maybe Drumpf committed the crime in his mind (and was thinking out loud about it)... like a "future crime". Couldn't they nail him for that? Just asking for Frank.

                          "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                          "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                          "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                          GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                          Comment

                          • frank ryan
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 12284

                            #10288
                            Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                            General twitter consensus is that Mueller didn’t...do so well. I haven’t seen any video. Sounds like any serious thought of impeachment is gone now.
                            I’m not sure about the twitterverse. I tend to stay off of there. There weren’t any home runs. Mueller confirmed or reiterated some things. Trump ordered his attorney to lie. Mueller did not agree with Barr’s bullshit letter, and he the insinuation that was party to a botched legal coup or witch-hunt was an insult and offensive.

                            It’s also telling that the GOP keeps insisting the Steele report is discredited or completely made up. It’s held up well.

                            We can all follow his lead and stop saying Trump was exonerated or that there is zero evidence. To do otherwise is dishonest or ignorant.

                            Mueller was hamstrung by DOJ guidelines. I wish the Democrats would have moved beyond their strategy to highlight the obstructive acts in details.
                            Last edited by frank ryan; 07-24-2019, 12:43 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Uncle Ted
                              The Big 12 money shot.
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 28853

                              #10289
                              Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                              General twitter consensus is that Mueller didn’t...do so well. I haven’t seen any video. Sounds like any serious thought of impeachment is gone now.


                              Yeah, it doesn't look like Pence will be president now until 2024.
                              "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                              "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                              "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                              GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                              Comment

                              • Northwestcoug
                                Cocked and Loaded
                                • May 2011
                                • 17941

                                #10290
                                Originally posted by BlueK View Post
                                Mueller just said establishing criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard he used for concluding what he did, but it is not the same thing as "no evidence"
                                Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
                                I’m not sure about the twitterverse. I tend to stay off of there. There weren’t any home runs. Mueller confirmed or reiterated some things. Trump ordered his attorney to lie. Mueller did not agree with Barr’s bullshit letter, and he the insinuation that was party to a botched legal coup or witch-hunt was an insult and offensive.

                                It’s also telling that the GOP keeps insisting the Steele report is discredited or completely made up. It’s held up well.

                                We can all follow his lead and stop saying Trump was exonerated or that there is zero evidence. To do otherwise is dishonest or ignorant.

                                Mueller was hamstrung by DOJ guidelines. I wish the Democrats would have moved beyond their strategy to highlight the obstructive acts in details.
                                I was referring to the political fight for impeachment. Not providing a smoking gun is one thing. But he was apparently slow and halting in some of his answers. If the democrats were hoping his testimony would move the political 'will' needle towards impeachment, it doesn't sound like it did.
                                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                                - SeattleUte

                                Comment

                                Working...