That they didn't establish air superiority is the puzzling part of "we haven't seen them yet." For a super-power, that the Ukrainians still have manned combat aircraft of any kind means, to me, that the Russians either a) can't establish it, b) don't want to risk their better weapons, or c) tried and failed and this is all there is. I recognize that a and c are similar, but I think of "a" as an on-going attempt, and "c" as their having failed, but deciding to press on as is.
As for pivoting, I wonder how much not having the fullness of Clark and Subic weakens response time. Also, we should do everything we can to keep the Okinawans happy so that we don't lose Kadena. Here's a Congressional report of policy ideas and decisions that could help relieve Okinawan opposition to the bases:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/prod...f/IF/IF10672/3
However, I think that since that report was written, China's f**ery vis a vis Taiwan will like thwart opposition to a US presence, especially since many Japanese still oppose amending Article 9 of their constitution to allow for offensive weapons. This article offers a recent take on their attitude towards warfare (it's complicated).
https://www.chicagotribune.com/opini...vgu-story.html
As for pivoting, I wonder how much not having the fullness of Clark and Subic weakens response time. Also, we should do everything we can to keep the Okinawans happy so that we don't lose Kadena. Here's a Congressional report of policy ideas and decisions that could help relieve Okinawan opposition to the bases:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/prod...f/IF/IF10672/3
However, I think that since that report was written, China's f**ery vis a vis Taiwan will like thwart opposition to a US presence, especially since many Japanese still oppose amending Article 9 of their constitution to allow for offensive weapons. This article offers a recent take on their attitude towards warfare (it's complicated).
https://www.chicagotribune.com/opini...vgu-story.html


Comment