Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poinsettia Bowl

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by BlueK View Post
    I agree this is what happened. And for the bowl game I'm pretty sure we'll see the offense adjust to emphasize what Tanner can do better.
    I agree as well. However, Tanner will be throwing to the same group of receivers. I question whether BYU has a legitimate deep threat. Not sure how much of the long game difficulties are due to passing accuracy and how much is due to receivers not getting open or possessing the speed to separate from defenders.
    “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
    "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
      I agree as well. However, Tanner will be throwing to the same group of receivers. I question whether BYU has a legitimate deep threat. Not sure how much of the long game difficulties are due to passing accuracy and how much is due to receivers not getting open or possessing the speed to separate from defenders.
      Trinnaman and Kurtz have been completely underwhelming. Kurtz is so soft and Trinniman is virtually non existent for most of every game.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
        I agree as well. However, Tanner will be throwing to the same group of receivers. I question whether BYU has a legitimate deep threat. Not sure how much of the long game difficulties are due to passing accuracy and how much is due to receivers not getting open or possessing the speed to separate from defenders.
        I know last year's receivers are a little different as a group, so it's hard to compare Tanner throwing to them last year vs. Taysom with this year's group. However, One thing I remember last year is it didn't seem like Tanner even needed that much separation from the receiver vs. the defense. Sometimes the only separation was the height difference and Tanner putting the ball where the receiver could grab it. Taysom doesn't have that skill to the same degree from what I can tell. Yes, he does put the ball in the right place sometimes, but not consistently. He has arm strength, but where the ball actually goes seems to be more random. It's a game of inches. My theory is he never perfected that skill because he always had his legs to fall back on when the receiver wasn't wide open. Granted, it's hard to know for sure because the receivers this year are not all the same people. But the ones who were here last year suddenly actually seem worse. Hill not being able to get them the ball with the right timing or in the right place seems like a plausible explanation, among others.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
          Trinnaman and Kurtz have been completely underwhelming. Kurtz is so soft and Trinniman is virtually non existent for most of every game.
          Kurtz was much better last year.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
            I think it is absurd to assume BYU would be have won 2 more games with Tanner at QB. I get the excitement of seeing what Tanner can do with adequate prep and a gameplan built around him but lets stay smart about this situation.
            I don't think it's absurd.

            The difference between 11-1 and 8-4 was arguably 2-4 plays a game and I think that Tanner is 2-4 plays better per game than Taysom.

            The perception of the daunting schedule tempered a lot of the criticism that Taysom should've faced. He should've been benched multiple times during the year including the first game at halftime.

            UA - awful
            UCLA - awful
            MichSU - awful
            MissSU - awful
            BSU - should've won
            WVU - had a decent chance
            Utah - Taysom threw a pick six and Utah had a bajillion TOS and it still came down to the last play

            The only quality win was Toledo.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
              It's funny you used this as an example because it perfectly illustrates how irrational fan perceptions can be. Under Taysom Hill, BYU was #13 in the nation on third-down conversions this year.

              https://www.teamrankings.com/college...conversion-pct
              In the name of stats, pick your QB based on his passing

              A-324/560 57.9% 4032 yards 7.2 yards per attempt 35/21 TD/INT 131.5 rating

              B-609/1049 58.1% 6929 yards 6.6 yards per attempt 43/32 TD/INT 121.0 rating
              Get confident, stupid
              -landpoke

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                In the name of stats, pick your QB based on his passing

                A-324/560 57.9% 4032 yards 7.2 yards per attempt 35/21 TD/INT 131.5 rating

                B-609/1049 58.1% 6929 yards 6.6 yards per attempt 43/32 TD/INT 121.0 rating

                Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                  In the name of stats, pick your QB based on his passing

                  A-324/560 57.9% 4032 yards 7.2 yards per attempt 35/21 TD/INT 131.5 rating

                  B-609/1049 58.1% 6929 yards 6.6 yards per attempt 43/32 TD/INT 121.0 rating
                  knowing the asker, I'm guessing one of the two (likely the higher) A is Riley and B is Taysom

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                    In the name of stats, pick your QB based on his passing

                    A-324/560 57.9% 4032 yards 7.2 yards per attempt 35/21 TD/INT 131.5 rating

                    B-609/1049 58.1% 6929 yards 6.6 yards per attempt 43/32 TD/INT 121.0 rating
                    Jake Locker vs Taysom?
                    *Banned*

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                      In the name of stats, pick your QB based on his passing

                      A-324/560 57.9% 4032 yards 7.2 yards per attempt 35/21 TD/INT 131.5 rating

                      B-609/1049 58.1% 6929 yards 6.6 yards per attempt 43/32 TD/INT 121.0 rating
                      A?
                      Dyslexics are teople poo...

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Yeah, of course Tanner would've won all of those games.

                        Can you imagine what we could've done last year with Tanner Mangum at quarterback? No way we would've lost to Utah, Missouri, or Michigan.
                        Last edited by Jeff Lebowski; 11-29-2016, 04:19 PM.
                        "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                        "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                        "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by cougjunkie View Post
                          Jake Locker vs Taysom?
                          Bro, I wouldn't dare compare anyone to the greatest football player in the history of the known universe.
                          Get confident, stupid
                          -landpoke

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                            Yeah, of course Tanner would've won all of those games.

                            Can you imagine what we could've done last year with Tanner Mangum at quarterback? No way we would've lost to Utah, Missouri, or Michigan.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                            I've seen you call things straw men and red herring. I'm going to have to think about it for a minute and see which one of those this post is. Hold on, I'll be back.
                            Get confident, stupid
                            -landpoke

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by fusnik View Post
                              I don't think it's absurd.

                              The difference between 11-1 and 8-4 was arguably 2-4 plays a game and I think that Tanner is 2-4 plays better per game than Taysom.

                              The perception of the daunting schedule tempered a lot of the criticism that Taysom should've faced. He should've been benched multiple times during the year including the first game at halftime.

                              UA - awful
                              UCLA - awful
                              MichSU - awful
                              MissSU - awful
                              BSU - should've won
                              WVU - had a decent chance
                              Utah - Taysom threw a pick six and Utah had a bajillion TOS and it still came down to the last play

                              The only quality win was Toledo.
                              But if you are going to give the team 2-4 better passing plays you also have to take back all of the scramble plays that resulted in gains or first downs or touchdowns that Mangum could never do. Maybe some of those scrambles would have also been completed passes, but not all of them as the problems with the O line, particularly at the beginning of the year, seem to be well-documented. So you may think he is 2-4 plays better per game, but I dont think there is any way to know that. Maybe, but probably not, IMO. And, as has been pointed out, the coaches do this to live, so they are going to do whatever they think is the best thing to do.
                              PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by creekster View Post
                                But if you are going to give the team 2-4 better passing plays you also have to take back all of the scramble plays that resulted in gains or first downs or touchdowns that Mangum could never do. Maybe some of those scrambles would have also been completed passes, but not all of them as the problems with the O line, particularly at the beginning of the year, seem to be well-documented. So you may think he is 2-4 plays better per game, but I dont think there is any way to know that. Maybe, but probably not, IMO. And, as has been pointed out, the coaches do this to live, so they are going to do whatever they think is the best thing to do.
                                I didn't say pass plays only, I think he is 2-4 plays better overall per game.

                                Could the final record still be 8-4 even with a QB that is 2-4 plays better? Of course but if you could simulate the games with Tanner vs Taysom I think they win 2 and maybe 3 more games.

                                As far as the coaching staff, they called a fake punt from their own end zone, say yeah I think it's safe to say they make mistakes that could easily cost them their livelihood.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X