Help Wanted: Who replaces Bronco?

[creekster]

Don't listen to these grumps, SU. We can take your ribbing.

Of course I can take it. It's isn't hard to take somebody thinking we are talking about Gary freakin' Anderson when we mean Lance. But sometimes I don't want it (I choose not to use the royal 'we.') Besides, are you afraid he won't come back? Don't worry; he'll be back. He LOVES the extra attention. It's why he's here.

[Jeff Lebowski]

Of course I can take it. It's isn't hard to take somebody thinking we are talking about Gary freakin' Anderson when we mean Lance. But sometimes I don't want it (I choose not to use the royal 'we.') Besides, are you afraid he won't come back? Don't worry; he'll be back. He LOVES the extra attention. It's why he's here.

SU's certitude in spite of his occasional cluelessness about sports is one of his most endearing features.

[The_Douger]

No, there could be reasons.

You think they're just lining up their ducks so they can make one big announcement?

I could be wrong, but I just feel like Sitake would mean a lot to our recruiting. I frequently see Polynesian patients at work, and most say they love BYU, but they love Sitake more and that's why so many kids went to Utah to play for him. I feel like it could bridge some of the talent issues we've had, especially in the trenches, and I'm not sure KN has the same pull in the community. These families just love Sitake and say he makes their kids feel like family.

That's why I'm high on Sitake, and I think many of us have wanted him back at BYU.

[creekster]

SU's certitude in spite of his occasional cluelessness about sports is one of his most endearing features.

I'm glad you are so enamored with it. Isn't there a wuap-created greatest hits thread somewhere for your enjoyment? As for me, He, and funk and the rest of the lot can stay away from this thread.

[Art Vandelay]

No, there could be reasons.

Most bishops haven't finished tithing settlement yet. We may have to wait a couple more weeks

[Color Me Badd Fan]

I too see the lack of buzz. I don't think that necessarily weighs all that heavily into whether he would be a good hire.

Eleven years as head coach is a really long tenure in today's environment. I'm not sure why people feel shafted. He was one of the top ten tenured coaches in the country and we had a good run. Let him get paid. Let him take on the new challenge that he seems so keen to. Not every coach needs to be a lifer. Not even the top programs in the country get that.

I'm not sure whether Anderson is even realistic. If he is, he would be an excellent choice, preferable to Sitake or Ken N IMO. He's coached under Harbaugh.

Bronco wasn't a BYU guy before he was the DC for two years. And didn't Anderson attend BYU for a year?

[Jeff Lebowski]

Help Wanted: Who replaces Bronco?

I'm glad you are so enamored with it. Isn't there a wuap-created greatest hits thread somewhere for your enjoyment? As for me, He, and funk and the rest of the lot can stay away from this thread.

lol. Creekster demanding a safe space.

[Jeff Lebowski]

What if we let them stay on the condition that they provide us with trigger warnings?

[creekster]

lol. Creekster demanding a safe zone.

Whatever. Sort of like trying to keep LAUte or BYU71 or some of the others away, I guess. But, hey, if you are afraid of missing a moments endearment from SU's sports lunacy, then may he post at will. As for me, he can GTFO. This isnt speaker's corner, this isnt a university. This isn't a Ute-themed board, as was made abundantly clear by the name change. So why should I need to be worried about his (or any Ute's) little whinings about this topic?

On balance I just want to know who the next coach is. But assuming it is either Sitake or Anderson (that's LANCE, not GARY) I am more concerned about the OC than the DC.

[smokymountainrain]

creekster reminding us why he is a perennial CS MVP contender.

[Blueintheface]

I keep hearing "Eye of The Tiger" as I read that post, Creek.

[Sleeping in EQ]

Good hell. Can we stop all the panty waist nanny goating?

Sitake has never been the BMOC, and until he steps into that role, no one knows how he will run things.

[SeattleUte]

I'm gratified that you all agree with me that Gary Andersen is not a prospect.

I have no opinion about Lance Anderson other than to wonder if he is a candidate anywhere else, and if not why not, since Stanford's defense has been strongly admired and Stanford is a marquis program.

[Jeff Lebowski]

Here we go:

http://www.capitalgazette.com/sports/navy_sports/ph-ac-cs-navy-niumataolo-meeting-1211-20151210-story.html

SU, please don't comment on this.

[SeattleUte]

Whatever. Sort of like trying to keep LAUte or BYU71 or some of the others away, I guess. But, hey, if you are afraid of missing a moments endearment from SU's sports lunacy, then may he post at will. As for me, he can GTFO. This isnt speaker's corner, this isnt a university. This isn't a Ute-themed board, as was made abundantly clear by the name change. So why should I need to be worried about his (or any Ute's) little whinings about this topic?

On balance I just want to know who the next coach is. But assuming it is either Sitake or Anderson (that's LANCE, not GARY) I am more concerned about the OC than the DC.

I plead guilty to not knowing the name or religious affiliation of Stanford's defensive coordinator until today. If that makes me a "sports lunatic" in this place so be it.