Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2015 April Conference Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Copelius View Post
    I can wiggle them but I have never tried while singing. It may be like patting your head while rubbing your belly.
    Stand by the black guy and you'll get plenty of air time.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by RC Vikings View Post
      Stand by the black guy and you'll get plenty of air time.
      I'll put in the request to the seating chairman, but I think the black guy is a tenor or baritone.
      “Every player dreams of being a Yankee, and if they don’t it’s because they never got the chance.” Aroldis Chapman

      Comment


      • #63
        Does this make Copelius the closest thing to a GA we have on CS? I don't know anybody else who has been live on camera during a session of general conference.
        I'm like LeBron James.
        -mpfunk

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by RC Vikings View Post
          Stand by the black guy and you'll get plenty of air time.
          LOL

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
            Does this make Copelius the closest thing to a GA we have on CS? I don't know anybody else who has been live on camera during a session of general conference.
            JL was:

            photobomb.jpg
            One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.

            Woot

            I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
            SU

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Copelius View Post
              I'll put in the request to the seating chairman, but I think the black guy is a tenor or baritone.
              We are such a diverse church!
              Get confident, stupid
              -landpoke

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                We are such a diverse church!
                We are actually pretty diverse. Just not within the required 100 miles of temple square.
                “Every player dreams of being a Yankee, and if they don’t it’s because they never got the chance.” Aroldis Chapman

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Copelius View Post
                  We are actually pretty diverse. Just not within the required 100 miles of temple square.
                  Even within Temple Square, tbh. If you don't believe me, just check out the conference issue of the Ensign!
                  I'm like LeBron James.
                  -mpfunk

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by snowcat View Post
                    JL was:

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]5679[/ATTACH]
                    I totally didn't see that coming!
                    I told him he was a goddamn Nazi Stormtrooper.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Dwight Schr-ute View Post
                      I totally didn't see that coming!
                      Smart-ass comment from Schrute
                      One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.

                      Woot

                      I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
                      SU

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by scottie View Post
                        And Devin Durrant spoke in April, 1984 priesthood session:

                        https://www.lds.org/general-conferen...ecide?lang=eng
                        My cousin (first, once removed) spoke in the priesthood session way back in 1963.
                        When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party. --Tuck Pendleton

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          While reading through some old conference talks, I found it interesting that the slippery slope argument was being used all the way back in 1881: http://jod.mrm.org/22/169

                          But no, my friends, I will tell you: If we were to give up polygamy today—if we were to say to our government, “Oh, yes, we will give up polygamy”—why the next they would say would be, But look here; you have got to give up something more than that.” They would tell us, as the Missourians did, that we must quit believing in prophets, apostles and revelation. The same feeling exists today as existed then.
                          I wonder if Pres Woodruff would be shocked to find out that even though we gave up polygamy, we are still allowed to believe in prophets, apostles and revelation.
                          "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                            While reading through some old conference talks, I found it interesting that the slippery slope argument was being used all the way back in 1881: http://jod.mrm.org/22/169



                            I wonder if Pres Woodruff would be shocked to find out that even though we gave up polygamy, we are still allowed to believe in prophets, apostles and revelation.
                            No, he wouldn't be. He was a prophet.
                            I told him he was a goddamn Nazi Stormtrooper.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                              While reading through some old conference talks, I found it interesting that the slippery slope argument was being used all the way back in 1881: http://jod.mrm.org/22/169



                              I wonder if Pres Woodruff would be shocked to find out that even though we gave up polygamy, we are still allowed to believe in prophets, apostles and revelation.
                              Ha. Great find.
                              "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                              "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                              "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                                While reading through some old conference talks, I found it interesting that the slippery slope argument was being used all the way back in 1881: http://jod.mrm.org/22/169



                                I wonder if Pres Woodruff would be shocked to find out that even though we gave up polygamy, we are still allowed to believe in prophets, apostles and revelation.
                                So is today's tea prohibition the 1880's version of polygamy?
                                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                                - SeattleUte

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X