^^ stolen from replies to Kate Kelly's posting of this post. But really, beyond the logical fallacy of the premise, the ten points aren't even true, or at least have huge caveats.
Even if you're against female ordination, I would think you'd be wise enough to at least not defend it logically, out of the fear of becoming 2034's Mark E Peterson. There's at least a decent chance that women will be ordained someday and you want to go on record defending why they shouldn't? Just say it's not time and you don't know when or if it will be. Just dumb.
Even if you're against female ordination, I would think you'd be wise enough to at least not defend it logically, out of the fear of becoming 2034's Mark E Peterson. There's at least a decent chance that women will be ordained someday and you want to go on record defending why they shouldn't? Just say it's not time and you don't know when or if it will be. Just dumb.
Comment