Originally posted by TripletDaddy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Bigots’ Last Hurrah
Collapse
X
-
This is allegedly why President Monson allegedly called Prop 8 'our Gettysburg'.
Comment
-
I can see what you are saying actually happening. I doubt every Bishop is the same. Some may be far more conservative in others and feel right about using their position to push their more conservative values in the name of righteousness, even going beyond what the brethern may say.Originally posted by wuapinmon View PostAlright, I have no evidence that I'll make public out of respect for those who gave it to me. My own bishop and stake presidency are hinting at withholding recommends over not doing your hometeaching, let alone for not participating in the single-most-important-issue-that-we-have-ever-seen-as-a-nation.
You can ignore me if you wish.
Comment
-
For it to be "our Gettysburg" (the Church representing the North obviously, not the South) the Church would have to win not just the battle but the entire war.Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostThis is allegedly why President Monson allegedly called Prop 8 'our Gettysburg'.
The war against gay marriage will be lost, my friend. There is no doubt. It's only a matter of time.
Comment
-
-
I should have clarified my point in my post above. I don't doubt it happened, but for my part if you are going to pass something off as fact and use it in your argument, you should be able to back it up with something more than "I know". Carry on.Originally posted by wuapinmon View PostAlright, I have no evidence that I'll make public out of respect for those who gave it to me. My own bishop and stake presidency are hinting at withholding recommends over not doing your hometeaching, let alone for not participating in the single-most-important-issue-that-we-have-ever-seen-as-a-nation.
You can ignore me if you wish.
FWIW, in my opinion the priesthood responsibility of hometeaching >>>>>> how somebody votes on Prop 8. I can certainly understand your SP and Bishop withholding recommends for that reason, while withholding recommends for a person's position on Prop is absurd.I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
Comment
-
And making the leap from calling Cardiacs ridicule undemocratic and stupid is more or less absurd than calling me a bigot because I think his ridicule is stupid:Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
http://www.borev.net/funnynewyorkerfunny.gif
Comment
-
When I see the word "Hurrah" all I can think of is these Norwegian fellows:
[YOUTUBE]ysUjYAi0WcQ[/YOUTUBE]Last edited by SoonerCoug; 04-19-2009, 08:26 PM.That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
-
A little perspective here. The LDS Church is a monolithic organization like Catholicism. It's not like Judaism, or for that matter Islam or Protestants. So it's an easy target, and an appropriate target. The institution takes a position, mobilizes its adherants, and people criticize the institution for its position. They may even call the intsitution bigoted. There's nothng wrong with any of that. It's not the same thing as saying all Jews or all Mormons or all Muslims or all Baptists are [insert negative charactaristic]. But because Mormons' identity is so uiquely tied up in the institution, they personalize attacks on the institution. They think all Mormons are being attacked. They're not.
There is no Jewish Church to throw its money and influence behind Proposition 8 or other cause. You can't really even find a cause about with which you can generalize a Jewish association or sympathy, except to some extent Israel, as you can, say, Southern Baptists or Mormons and abortion or gay rights. (People used to think all Jews were Communists; that was part of the Nazi rationalization for the Holocaust.) And plenty of criticism gets leveled at Israel and its supporters. Individually, Jews are also quite heterogenious in their political views. The most you could say is that they tend to be more urban centered and liberal leaning. But even that is tenuous. Thus, any negative comment about Jews as a class inevitably will fairly draw a charge of bigotry. But the LDS Church as an institution is a different kettle of fish.
Finally, you have the point that Jews represent the oldest monotheistic religion in the world, that goes back over 3,000 years. The roots are tribal, centered in a fairly limited geography, and from their origins and for thousands of years thereafter Jews were a structurally discrete people. Even after they spread all over the world, they lived in ghettos and such. Jews are mostly a semitic people and there is a large scale sharing of genetic traits.
So the "LDS Church" and "Jews" are not comparable.Last edited by SeattleUte; 04-19-2009, 08:28 PM.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
I think the Zoroastrians would disagree with this statement.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostFinally, you have the point that Jews represent the oldest monotheistic religion in the world,"Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon
Comment
-
The LDS Church is the organization. Jews are not the organization. Therefore, you can't compare the two. Technically, you're right.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostA little perspective here. The LDS Church is a monolithic organization like Catholicism. It's not like Judaism, or for that matter Islam or Protestants. So it's an easy target, and an appropriate target. The institution takes a position, mobilizes its adherants, and people criticize the institution for its position. They may even call the intsitution bigoted. There's nothng wrong with any of that. It's not the same thing as saying all Jews or all Mormons or all Muslims or all Baptists are [insert negative charactaristic]. But because Mormons' identity is so uiquely tied up in the institution, they personalize attacks on the institution. They think all Mormons are being attacked. They're not.
There is no Jewish Church to throw its money and influence behind Proposition 8 or other cause. You can't really even find a cause about with which you can generalize a Jewish association or sympathy, except to some extent Israel, as you can, say, Southern Baptists or Mormons and abortion or gay rights. (People used to think all Jews were Communists; that was part of the Nazi rationalization for the Holocaust.) And plenty of criticism gets leveled at Israel and its supporters. Individually, Jews are also quite heterogenious in their political views. The most you could say is that they tend to be more urban centered and liberal leaning. But even that is tenuous. Thus, any negative comment about Jews as a class inevitably will fairly draw a charge of bigotry. But the LDS Church as an institution is a different kettle of fish.
Finally, you have the point that Jews represent the oldest monotheistic religion in the world, that goes back over 3,000 years. The roots are tribal, centered in a fairly limited geography, and from their origins and for thousands of years thereafter Jews were a structurally discrete people. Even after they spread all over the world, they lived in ghettos and such. Jews are mostly a semitic people and there is a large scale sharing of genetic traits.
So the "LDS Church" and "Jews" are not comparable.
Mormons and Jews can be compared when it comes to being bigoted against either group of people.
Nice try."Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostA little perspective here. The LDS Church is a monolithic organization like Catholicism. It's not like Judaism, or for that matter Islam or Protestants. So it's an easy target, and an appropriate target. The institution takes a position, mobilizes its adherants, and people criticize the institution for its position. They may even call the intsitution bigoted. There's nothng wrong with any of that. It's not the same thing as saying all Jews or all Mormons or all Muslims or all Baptists are [insert negative charactaristic]. But because Mormons' identity is so uiquely tied up in the institution, they personalize attacks on the institution. They think all Mormons are being attacked. They're not.
There is no Jewish Church to throw its money and influence behind Proposition 8 or other cause. You can't really even find a cause about with which you can generalize a Jewish association or sympathy, except to some extent Israel, as you can, say, Southern Baptists or Mormons and abortion or gay rights. (People used to think all Jews were Communists; that was part of the Nazi rationalization for the Holocaust.) And plenty of criticism gets leveled at Israel and its supporters. Individually, Jews are also quite heterogenious in their political views. The most you could say is that they tend to be more urban centered and liberal leaning. But even that is tenuous. Thus, any negative comment about Jews as a class inevitably will fairly draw a charge of bigotry. But the LDS Church as an institution is a different kettle of fish.
Finally, you have the point that Jews represent the oldest monotheistic religion in the world, that goes back over 3,000 years. The roots are tribal, centered in a fairly limited geography, and from their origins and for thousands of years thereafter Jews were a structurally discrete people. Even after they spread all over the world, they lived in ghettos and such. Jews are mostly a semitic people and there is a large scale sharing of genetic traits.
So the "LDS Church" and "Jews" are not comparable.
On a scale of 1-10 how "utterly intolerant" would you say you are in the LDS churches stand on gay marriage. I would put myself at about a 3-4.
Comment
Comment