The Pac-12 participation thread.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hot Lunch
    Out of Office
    • Nov 2008
    • 7842

    #151
    Originally posted by SipiTau View Post
    I like the potential from the skill guys, the question is, can the OL get a decent push or protect Fat QB? Pete really slacked off in recruiting the trenches his last three years. I like what Kiffin has done with his last two classes, but we're still lacking in OL/DL depth. At least we'll have a game to prep for the Ute's DL. I'm not sure if SC will come across a more physical DL next season.
    The inexperience of SC's o-line and the talent that Utah has on their D-Line is the only thing that gives me a very very small bit of hope for that game. They do have a game to gel but thank goodness it is still very early.
    "Take it to the Bank"

    Comment

    • Hot Lunch
      Out of Office
      • Nov 2008
      • 7842

      #152
      Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
      I still don't understand why he brought his old man. The USC defense was in trouble from the Hawaii game, luckily they had an accidental helmet to helmet that caused the Hawaii QB to leave the game or that might have ended badly.
      Old Man Kif's resume spoke for itself prior to his arrival at SC.
      "Take it to the Bank"

      Comment

      • HuskyFreeNorthwest
        Time to camp
        • Nov 2008
        • 26082

        #153
        Originally posted by Hot Lunch View Post
        Old Man Kif's resume spoke for itself prior to his arrival at SC.
        Not against college offenses. Every smarmy person that calls great college offenses gimmicks, is always quick to point out that they never work in the NFL. Well why would you try and use the same defense that stops awesome pro non-gimmick offenses?

        When a college coach goes to the NFL many are always skeptical that he will be a success. Why should one assume that an NFL coach, regardless of success will be the same in college?
        Get confident, stupid
        -landpoke

        Comment

        • SipiTau
          King of the 3rd Cheek
          • Nov 2008
          • 309

          #154
          Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
          I still don't understand why he brought his old man. The USC defense was in trouble from the Hawaii game, luckily they had an accidental helmet to helmet that caused the Hawaii QB to leave the game or that might have ended badly.
          I don't think it was an accidental helmet to helmet. I can't blame him, the old man has the resume and he had success at Tenn. Some of the boys I know, said that the defense was overly complicated; multiple coverages dependent on pre snap formation & movement. The old man ran a simplified version of the D at Tenn; SC's D responded better, when he reverted to his Tenn gameplan.

          Comment

          • Hot Lunch
            Out of Office
            • Nov 2008
            • 7842

            #155
            Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
            Not against college offenses. Every smarmy person that calls great college offenses gimmicks, is always quick to point out that they never work in the NFL. Well why would you try and use the same defense that stops awesome pro non-gimmick offenses?

            When a college coach goes to the NFL many are always skeptical that he will be a success. Why should one assume that an NFL coach, regardless of success will be the same in college?
            I think they ranked around 25th in total defense in 2009 while at Tennessee. That is going against the best talent in college football. Before that it looks like it was 1982 when he last coached in college.
            "Take it to the Bank"

            Comment

            • Portland Ute
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2008
              • 5647

              #156
              For some reason, reading this thread today made me think of this:




              Today, it seems they are fighting the evil forces of the Green Lantern. Or whatever the hell this is:

              Comment

              • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                Time to camp
                • Nov 2008
                • 26082

                #157
                Originally posted by Portland Ute View Post
                For some reason, reading this thread today made me think of this:

                Today, it seems they are fighting the evil forces of the Green Lantern. Or whatever the hell this is:
                LOL Oklahoma and Southern Cal are the good and Oregon is a villain.

                Just don't count the NCAA investigations. I do agree with DDD as Robin however.
                Get confident, stupid
                -landpoke

                Comment

                • Paperback Writer
                  Signature won a Pulitzer
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 5211

                  #158
                  Originally posted by Hot Lunch View Post
                  I think they ranked around 25th in total defense in 2009 while at Tennessee. That is going against the best talent in college football. Before that it looks like it was 1982 when he last coached in college.
                  That's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.
                  “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                  "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                  Comment

                  • TripletDaddy
                    sweet triple
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 58186

                    #159
                    Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                    That's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.
                    It is funny that you mention the Wishbone and Oregon's offense in the same post.
                    Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                      Time to camp
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 26082

                      #160
                      Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                      That's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.
                      I'll take that bet.
                      Get confident, stupid
                      -landpoke

                      Comment

                      • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                        Time to camp
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 26082

                        #161
                        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                        It is funny that you mention the Wishbone and Oregon's offense in the same post.
                        Robin I think you are supposed to wait for Batgirl to post first, then follow her up with something supportive.
                        Get confident, stupid
                        -landpoke

                        Comment

                        • Paperback Writer
                          Signature won a Pulitzer
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 5211

                          #162
                          Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                          It is funny that you mention the Wishbone and Oregon's offense in the same post.
                          The Wishbone was the "gimmick" offense back in the day. Oregon's spread option offense has option football principals built into it like the Wishbone. Both of the offenses originated in Texas' high schools. You might laugh, but the Wishbone and Spread Option do have a lot in common.
                          “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                          "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                          Comment

                          • Portland Ute
                            Junior Member
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 5647

                            #163
                            Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                            LOL Oklahoma and Southern Cal are the good and Oregon is a villain.

                            Just don't count the NCAA investigations. I do agree with DDD as Robin however.

                            (pssst...it was a joke.)

                            Comment

                            • Paperback Writer
                              Signature won a Pulitzer
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5211

                              #164
                              Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                              I'll take that bet.
                              Time will tell. Monte Kiffin may or may not be the man to stop Oregon's Spread Option but the answer is out there. I think Nebraska may have an answer for it right now. Offenses in college football are always cyclical. Defensive coordinators came up with answers to Oklahoma's wishbone, Nebraska's power option, BYU's air attack, Houston's Run and Shoot, etc. Oregon's spread offense is run exceptionally well but it can be matched and I think the clock is already running on it.
                              “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                              "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                              Comment

                              • Babs
                                Not a Lawyer
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 17128

                                #165
                                Originally posted by Portland Ute View Post
                                (pssst...it was a joke.)
                                Is not! :babs:

                                Comment

                                Working...