Originally posted by SipiTau
View Post
The Pac-12 participation thread.
Collapse
X
-
Old Man Kif's resume spoke for itself prior to his arrival at SC.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostI still don't understand why he brought his old man. The USC defense was in trouble from the Hawaii game, luckily they had an accidental helmet to helmet that caused the Hawaii QB to leave the game or that might have ended badly."Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
Not against college offenses. Every smarmy person that calls great college offenses gimmicks, is always quick to point out that they never work in the NFL. Well why would you try and use the same defense that stops awesome pro non-gimmick offenses?Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostOld Man Kif's resume spoke for itself prior to his arrival at SC.
When a college coach goes to the NFL many are always skeptical that he will be a success. Why should one assume that an NFL coach, regardless of success will be the same in college?Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
I don't think it was an accidental helmet to helmet. I can't blame him, the old man has the resume and he had success at Tenn. Some of the boys I know, said that the defense was overly complicated; multiple coverages dependent on pre snap formation & movement. The old man ran a simplified version of the D at Tenn; SC's D responded better, when he reverted to his Tenn gameplan.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostI still don't understand why he brought his old man. The USC defense was in trouble from the Hawaii game, luckily they had an accidental helmet to helmet that caused the Hawaii QB to leave the game or that might have ended badly.
Comment
-
I think they ranked around 25th in total defense in 2009 while at Tennessee. That is going against the best talent in college football. Before that it looks like it was 1982 when he last coached in college.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostNot against college offenses. Every smarmy person that calls great college offenses gimmicks, is always quick to point out that they never work in the NFL. Well why would you try and use the same defense that stops awesome pro non-gimmick offenses?
When a college coach goes to the NFL many are always skeptical that he will be a success. Why should one assume that an NFL coach, regardless of success will be the same in college?"Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
For some reason, reading this thread today made me think of this:

Today, it seems they are fighting the evil forces of the Green Lantern. Or whatever the hell this is:
Comment
-
LOL Oklahoma and Southern Cal are the good and Oregon is a villain.Originally posted by Portland Ute View PostFor some reason, reading this thread today made me think of this:
Today, it seems they are fighting the evil forces of the Green Lantern. Or whatever the hell this is:
Just don't count the NCAA investigations. I do agree with DDD as Robin however.Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
That's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostI think they ranked around 25th in total defense in 2009 while at Tennessee. That is going against the best talent in college football. Before that it looks like it was 1982 when he last coached in college.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
It is funny that you mention the Wishbone and Oregon's offense in the same post.Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostThat's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
I'll take that bet.Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostThat's what I was going to point out. Monte Kiffin was a very successful DC at Nebraska and Arkansas in the 1970s. I know it's kind of dated, but I don't think you can pin a specific defense for Kiffin Sr. Perhaps he's still stuck with his Pro-Style Tampa Cover-2 but the man figured out a way to slow down Barry Switzer's Sooner wishbone when few others had an answer. I think you give Monte Kiffin the personel and he can come up with a decent answer to Oregon's offense. Or he's smart enough to pick up the phone and call the HC and DC at his alma mater who probably do have a pretty good answer for it.Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
-
The Wishbone was the "gimmick" offense back in the day. Oregon's spread option offense has option football principals built into it like the Wishbone. Both of the offenses originated in Texas' high schools. You might laugh, but the Wishbone and Spread Option do have a lot in common.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostIt is funny that you mention the Wishbone and Oregon's offense in the same post.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
-
Time will tell. Monte Kiffin may or may not be the man to stop Oregon's Spread Option but the answer is out there. I think Nebraska may have an answer for it right now. Offenses in college football are always cyclical. Defensive coordinators came up with answers to Oklahoma's wishbone, Nebraska's power option, BYU's air attack, Houston's Run and Shoot, etc. Oregon's spread offense is run exceptionally well but it can be matched and I think the clock is already running on it.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostI'll take that bet.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
Comment