Information on the ESPN deal.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Surfah
    Where's Wallace?
    • Nov 2008
    • 33726

    #91
    Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
    As the live TV market for college football continues to splinter with each passing day, it will be interesting to see how these networks make good on their payouts.
    I've had the same thoughts. Is this sustainable? Good for the Pac 10 and Utah though. Take as much as you can get.
    "Nobody listens to Turtle."
    -Turtle
    sigpic

    Comment

    • Maximus
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 6045

      #92
      Originally posted by Jacob View Post
      TV networks want championship games. So it's pretty safe to conclude that the B12 will either go back to 12 or be destroyed, right? And that either way, they probably won't invite BYU.
      how is it safe to asusme if they go to 12 byu wouldnt be invited? they dont have many options.

      Comment

      • Jacob
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 6801

        #93
        Originally posted by Maximus View Post
        how is it safe to asusme if they go to 12 byu wouldnt be invited? they dont have many options.
        I said probably. I'm basing my opinion mostly on the fact that nobody has ever invited us in the past. I'm a skeptic by nature.

        Comment

        • LiveCoug
          LA Ute loves me
          • Nov 2008
          • 18489

          #94
          Originally posted by Jacob View Post
          I said probably. I'm basing my opinion mostly on the fact that nobody has ever invited us in the past. I'm a skeptic by nature.
          Nobody had ever invited Utah or TCU in the past either.

          Comment

          • TripletDaddy
            sweet triple
            • Nov 2008
            • 58186

            #95
            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
            3D, how did the Pac get such a rich TV deal with POS schools like Utah and CO?
            SC, Oregon, UW, Farm and Kal would be my guess.

            Is it that the deal would have been richer without them?
            Not richer, just not substantially less.
            Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

            sigpic

            Comment

            • OrangeUte
              Max Hall hates me.
              • Nov 2008
              • 2294

              #96
              Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
              As the live TV market for college football continues to splinter with each passing day, it will be interesting to see how these networks make good on their payouts.
              What evidence is there of a splintering or weakening of this market? Articles I have read indicate that live sports remain viable and in higher demand for advertisers.

              Comment

              • Portland Ute
                Junior Member
                • Dec 2008
                • 5647

                #97
                Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                SC, Oregon, UW, Farm and Kal would be my guess.



                Not richer, just not substantially less.
                I suppose it's been argued a thousand times and it will never have resolution, but I think a big part of getting this kind of money was getting to 12 teams and adding a championship game.

                So, even in your most blue-shaded, cynical glasses, DDD, you have to admit Utah and CU were numbers that were necessary.

                Now, you can say Utah and CU are just numbers, but at 20+ million per year, I think everyone involved would be just fine with that.

                Comment

                • Color Me Badd Fan
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 12523

                  #98
                  Fox is still involved. Welcome to FSN Battle Mountain. FSN dominates the I-80 corridor.

                  Anyway, that's a huge TV deal. I'm sure the dealmaker for the networks was the addition of a school that doesn't even control its own barely top 50 TV market (okay, maybe it's not barely top 50). I'm sure SoCal and the Bay Area were afterthoughts.

                  I've gone from thinking that college football TV payouts were too low to thinking they're too high. I thought it was hilarious how Jermaine O'Neal earned more money in one year a couple years ago than an overwhelming majority of BCS schools were earning on their TV contracts. Now it appears the pendulum has swung. If my math is correct, the Pac-10 will be getting about $250 million per year from FOX and ESPN. I also assume it will earn mtn. type money on its shitty games (Utah v. Washington State, Colorado v. Utah, Utah v. Arizona State, Washington v. Utah) -- maybe $27-30 million total per team? That's still too little for USC.
                  Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

                  Comment

                  • Portland Ute
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 5647

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                    Fox is still involved. Welcome to FSN Battle Mountain. FSN dominates the I-80 corridor.

                    Anyway, that's a huge TV deal. I'm sure the dealmaker for the networks was the addition of a school that doesn't even control its own barely top 50 TV market (okay, maybe it's not barely top 50). I'm sure SoCal and the Bay Area were afterthoughts.

                    I've gone from thinking that college football TV payouts were too low to thinking they're too high. I thought it was hilarious how Jermaine O'Neal earned more money in one year a couple years ago than an overwhelming majority of BCS schools were earning on their TV contracts. Now it appears the pendulum has swung. If my math is correct, the Pac-10 will be getting about $250 million per year from FOX and ESPN. I also assume it will earn mtn. type money on its shitty games (Utah v. Washington State, Colorado v. Utah, Utah v. Arizona State, Washington v. Utah) -- maybe $27-30 million total per team? That's still too little for USC.
                    Trolling ass.

                    Comment

                    • Lost Student
                      BAND!
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 4324

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                      Fox is still involved. Welcome to FSN Battle Mountain. FSN dominates the I-80 corridor.

                      Anyway, that's a huge TV deal. I'm sure the dealmaker for the networks was the addition of a school that doesn't even control its own barely top 50 TV market (okay, maybe it's not barely top 50). I'm sure SoCal and the Bay Area were afterthoughts.

                      I've gone from thinking that college football TV payouts were too low to thinking they're too high. I thought it was hilarious how Jermaine O'Neal earned more money in one year a couple years ago than an overwhelming majority of BCS schools were earning on their TV contracts. Now it appears the pendulum has swung. If my math is correct, the Pac-10 will be getting about $250 million per year from FOX and ESPN. I also assume it will earn mtn. type money on its shitty games (Utah v. Washington State, Colorado v. Utah, Utah v. Arizona State, Washington v. Utah) -- maybe $27-30 million total per team? That's still too little for USC.
                      I laughed.
                      "Seriously, is there a bigger high on the whole face of the earth than eating a salad?"--SeattleUte
                      "The only Ute to cause even half the nationwide hysteria of Jimmermania was Ted Bundy."--TripletDaddy
                      This is a tough, NYC broad, a doctor who deals with bleeding organs, dying people and testicles on a regular basis without crying."--oxcoug
                      "I'm not impressed (and I'm even into choreography . . .)"--Donuthole
                      "I too was fortunate to leave with my same balls."--byu71

                      Comment

                      • LA Ute
                        Receiver of Memory
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 19512

                        #101
                        Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
                        Fox is still involved. Welcome to FSN Battle Mountain. FSN dominates the I-80 corridor.

                        Anyway, that's a huge TV deal. I'm sure the dealmaker for the networks was the addition of a school that doesn't even control its own barely top 50 TV market (okay, maybe it's not barely top 50). I'm sure SoCal and the Bay Area were afterthoughts.

                        I've gone from thinking that college football TV payouts were too low to thinking they're too high. I thought it was hilarious how Jermaine O'Neal earned more money in one year a couple years ago than an overwhelming majority of BCS schools were earning on their TV contracts. Now it appears the pendulum has swung. If my math is correct, the Pac-10 will be getting about $250 million per year from FOX and ESPN. I also assume it will earn mtn. type money on its shitty games (Utah v. Washington State, Colorado v. Utah, Utah v. Arizona State, Washington v. Utah) -- maybe $27-30 million total per team? That's still too little for USC.
                        “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                        ― W.H. Auden


                        "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                        -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                        "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                        --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                        Comment

                        • YOhio
                          Hipster Mode
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 26165

                          #102
                          Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                          3D, how did the Pac get such a rich TV deal with POS schools like Utah and CO?

                          Is it that the deal would have been richer without them?
                          What do you care about the TV deal? You don't even have a television. Fans like you have obviously hurt the conferences' bargaining position.

                          Comment

                          • YOhio
                            Hipster Mode
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 26165

                            #103
                            Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                            That's not an approved smiley. Please edit your post with CUF correlated material.

                            Comment

                            • LA Ute
                              Receiver of Memory
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 19512

                              #104
                              Originally posted by YOhio View Post
                              That's not an approved smiley. Please edit your post with CUF correlated material.
                              “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                              ― W.H. Auden


                              "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                              -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                              "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                              --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                              Comment

                              • UteStar
                                Sexiest Poster in Town
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 2419

                                #105
                                Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                                GAME. SET. MATCH. LA UTE wins! YOhio loses. Again.

                                Comment

                                Working...