Originally posted by UVACoug
View Post
If I were the Big XII, I would look at it like this. The Pac-12 has a flat out lock down in the Western United States. The MWC made a serious run on competing, but, that was blown up by the land grabs of the BCS conferences. To compete with the Pac-12 (because the Eastern US is so competitive and saturated and competitive in their own markets)...that I would compete now with the Pac-12.
I would bring in BYU - for all the obvious reasons stated previously. Even with their warts, they are by far the best available option and brings a lot of good things with them ...more so than any negatives. Competes head on with Utah, and brings back some recruiting clout and controversy as to who is the better program in Utah and that brings exposure to both programs and conferneces. Good stuff.
Next...I would punch the Pac-12 right in the mouth and take San Diego State with BYU. Yeah yeah yeah...SDSU is the team that always underachieves. But with investment, and a decent confernece affiliation, they could/would compete with the other California schools. That would give the Big XII two separate footprints in the Western US that they currently don't have. They compete with the Pac-12 for recruits, bring premier teams into the West and it's "game on" from there on out. The Pac-12 has a monopoly and it's wide open for someone to go toe-to-toe with them. BYU & SDSU would do a more thorough job of doing this. BYU & CSU would not achieve what they are after (Denver market).





Comment