A tale of 3 morons, starring: Karl Malone, Gordon Monson, and Greg Miller.
First Karl pretends to speak for Sloan when he doesn't have a clue. here:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/sports/...tml.csp?page=1
And Gordon Monson print it all without doing any reporting work whatsoever. He flatly lies by claiming that he asked Phil Johnson about it.
Phil Johnson comes out in support of the Jazz organization's story and saying that Karl doesn't know what he is talking about.
Then the idiot trust fund baby Miller takes personal offence and like any child would do, publishes a lengthy blog post documenting every minor slight Malone ever showed him here:
http://www.greginutah.com/
We learn that Malone, a few days after a friendly meeting with Miller, cancelled a lunch. We learn that Malone was once late for an autograph signing.
I am concerned that Greg Miller will destroy the Jazz organization just because he is an idiot. Why would he make that post? And also calling Malone a "liar" on twitter. What benefit from attacking one of the statutes? We've always know of Malone's shortcomings. But we also know that Larry and Karl were good friends. If Greg wants to respond with a simple defense stating the facts as they are, fine. Do that. What kind of adult, let alone professional and magnate goes around publishing such petty diatribes? Moron!
You don't do that. You let Sloan respond, as he did in defense of the Jazz. End of story.
And back to Monson. There was absolutely nothing new in the story he published. Malone said the same things last year and everybody knew that Malone was full of crap. Malone doesn't want to believe Sloan is a quitter, but the fact is that he is. At least as Malone apparently defines it.
First Karl pretends to speak for Sloan when he doesn't have a clue. here:
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/sports/...tml.csp?page=1
And Gordon Monson print it all without doing any reporting work whatsoever. He flatly lies by claiming that he asked Phil Johnson about it.
Phil Johnson comes out in support of the Jazz organization's story and saying that Karl doesn't know what he is talking about.
Then the idiot trust fund baby Miller takes personal offence and like any child would do, publishes a lengthy blog post documenting every minor slight Malone ever showed him here:
http://www.greginutah.com/
We learn that Malone, a few days after a friendly meeting with Miller, cancelled a lunch. We learn that Malone was once late for an autograph signing.
I am concerned that Greg Miller will destroy the Jazz organization just because he is an idiot. Why would he make that post? And also calling Malone a "liar" on twitter. What benefit from attacking one of the statutes? We've always know of Malone's shortcomings. But we also know that Larry and Karl were good friends. If Greg wants to respond with a simple defense stating the facts as they are, fine. Do that. What kind of adult, let alone professional and magnate goes around publishing such petty diatribes? Moron!
You don't do that. You let Sloan respond, as he did in defense of the Jazz. End of story.
And back to Monson. There was absolutely nothing new in the story he published. Malone said the same things last year and everybody knew that Malone was full of crap. Malone doesn't want to believe Sloan is a quitter, but the fact is that he is. At least as Malone apparently defines it.
Comment