Impeaching Trump: Make America Sane Again

[frank ryan]

It is more an expression of disappointment than a compliment, but you can take it however you want.

You are betraying your education by such asinine comments. Regardless of whether you think anyone has a history of being wrong, your response does nothing more than increase polarization, avoid the issue and cast a crass hue over the thread. Maybe this is what you want, and your history of histrionic and crude posts suggests so, but that doesn't mean you should post it. IF there is anything that the poitical dialog in this country needs it is less hyperbole and crudities, not more.

I will also add that here I think Wapiti is spot on. After spending a year or more claiming to possess, not just believe but actually possess, hard documentation of russian collusive involvement with the Trump Administration, and then showing an empty hand when Mueller releases his report, it may be that Schiff is not the best face to put on this most recent claim. But, rather than comment on this idea, i guess we could just accuse each of other of fellating whoever we are accused of supporting.

It's almost like you read Barr's bullshit pre-emptive letter regarding Mueller's report and stopped there. If so, I can see how you might be less concerned than you otherwise ought to be.

Regardless, this issue seems pretty clear cut. You have an intelligence operative trying to go about things the right way and whistleblow legally. It's considered urgent to our national security, Barr's very partisan and very aggressive DOJ assumes some newer authority over that process to protect Trump.

It's ugly and frightening.

[wapiti]

It's almost like you read Barr's bullshit pre-emptive letter regarding Mueller's report and stopped there. If so, I can see how you might be less concerned than you otherwise ought to be.

Regardless, this issue seems pretty clear cut. You have an intelligence opportunity trying to go about things the right way and whistleblow legally. It's considered urgent to our national security, Barr's very partisan and very aggressive DOJ assumes some newer authority over that process to protect Trump.

It's ugly and frightening.

The infrastructure to impede this is only in place because of the number of times the dems have cried wolf. But let it play out, this doesn't look good for the president.

[Uncle Ted]

Hey everyone in Congress, can we impeach him now? Please?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-d...er-11568993176

Investigate Drumpf for telling the Ukraine President to look at the possible corruption by Biden and his son? Yeah, I agree. Congress should do a deep dive investigation with the Ukrainians on all of this. If Biden is taking his meds and they catch him on one of his better days they might even get an accurate answer out of him.

[Northwestcoug]

Investigate Drumpf for telling the Ukraine President to look at the possible corruption by Biden and his son? Yeah, I agree. Congress should do a deep dive investigation with the Ukrainians on all of this. If Biden is taking his meds and they catch him on one of his better days they might even get an accurate answer out of him.

What, no links? I hovered over your text 3 times just to make sure!

Of course, there is a chance that something nefarious was going on with Biden and Ukraine. But all available current evidence points to this being a nothingburger.

[Sleeping in EQ]

I'm reading The Federalist.

The warnings against a Trump-like character and our hack media (demagogues all, including the late night comedians) are strong and frequent.

[frank ryan]

I'm reading The Federalist.

The warnings against a Trump-like character and our hack media (demagogues all, including the late night comedians) are strong and frequent.

If you talking about main stream journalists and investigative journalists than I’m not with you. Pushing responsibility for Trump on the media is wearing a bit thin. They’ve been right with their reporting the majority of the time. The cries of fake news, and his supporters willingness to believe them are dangerous. We’ve had press attacked at his events. A reported was attacked by the GOP congressman from Montana.

Trump is as shitty as has been reported.

If you are talking about infotainers than they’re generally useless and too many get their news exclusively from them. Which is definitely a huge problems.

As for late night hosts, thank God we have satire.

[Sleeping in EQ]

If you talking about main stream journalists and investigative journalists than I’m not with you. Pushing responsibility for Trump on the media is wearing a bit thin. They’ve been right with their reporting the majority of the time. The cries of fake news, and his supporters willingness to believe them are dangerous. We’ve had press attacked at his events. A reported was attacked by the GOP congressman from Montana.

Trump is as shitty as has been reported.

If you are talking about infotainers than they’re generally useless and too many get their news exclusively from them. Which is definitely a huge problems.

As for late night hosts, thank God we have satire.

Just go read The Federalist. I think you'll enjoy it.

[frank ryan]

Just go read The Federalist. I think you'll enjoy it.

Ok, I’ll put it on my list.

[PaloAltoCougar]

I'm reading The Federalist.

The warnings against a Trump-like character and our hack media (demagogues all, including the late night comedians) are strong and frequent.

Agreed. Many of the essays are also instructive as to why the Constitution stands for much more than mere majoritarianism, which many believe is all that matters.

Fun (if egocentric) fact: My first sports board moniker, predating CB, CG, and CS, was Publius.

[cowboy]

Agreed. Many of the essays are also instructive as to why the Constitution stands for much more than mere majoritarianism, which many believe is all that matters.

Fun (if egocentric) fact: My first sports board moniker, predating CB, CG, and CS, was Publius.

This is a very important concept that I wish more civics teachers would emphasize. It's especially important when majorities are as slim as they are in this era. Admittedly, it's more important to Red Staters like me than others.

[Sleeping in EQ]

Agreed. Many of the essays are also instructive as to why the Constitution stands for much more than mere majoritarianism, which many believe is all that matters.

Fun (if egocentric) fact: My first sports board moniker, predating CB, CG, and CS, was Publius.

I'm enjoying The Federalist, so much so that although I haven't finished it yet, I'm often citing and recommending it.

Also, from now on I will think of you as a composite of Madison, Hamilton, and Jay.

[imanihonjin]

Trump is authorizing the release of a full, unredacted transcript of the call under question with the President of Ukraine.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/24/trum...aine-call.html

[Uncle Ted]

Trump is authorizing the release of a full, unredacted transcript of the call under question with the President of Ukraine.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/24/trum...aine-call.html

Good... maybe it will be the smoking gun to throw Biden and his dumbass son in jail.

[Commando]

Good... maybe it will be the smoking gun to throw Biden and his dumbass son in jail.

PROBABLY!!!

[Uncle Ted]

Ok, I’ll put it on my list.

Here is a good article to start off with...

New York Times Kavanaugh Reporter Told Source What To Say

Year-old texts contained in a Senate Judiciary Committee report show that New York Times reporter Robin Pogrebin engaged in questionable journalistic tactics to shape a false narrative against Kavanaugh by telling a source what to say and by asking sources to confirm information she herself had given them. And despite including a highly opinionated discussion of the text exchange in their book, the authors never admitted that Pogrebin was a key player in the exchanges.
[...]

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/20/new-york-times-kavanaugh-reporter-told-source-what-to-say/

LOL@NYTimes