Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

President Trump: Making America Great Again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    I am withholding my comments until SU weighs in...

    Yeah, that's not going to hold up under appeal. I wouldn't be that surprised if it's her way of getting off the case.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BlueK View Post

      Yeah, that's not going to hold up under appeal. I wouldn't be that surprised if it's her way of getting off the case.
      Yeah, let the supreme court decide.

      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BlueK View Post

        Yeah, that's not going to hold up under appeal. I wouldn't be that surprised if it's her way of getting off the case.
        And an effective stall tactic. Until Trump can be elected and pardon himself.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post

          Yeah, let the supreme court decide.

          So Hunter Biden's case has to be thrown out for the same reason? The idea of a special counsel has a pretty long history and has been upheld by scotus before.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by chrisrenrut View Post

            And an effective stall tactic. Until Trymp can be elected and pardon himself.
            Which thanks to the recent ruling on immunity Trump won't even need to do that.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BlueK View Post

              Which thanks to the recent ruling on immunity Trump won't even need to do that.
              Or maybe they will just say that Trump is an "Elderly Man with a Poor Memory” and drop everything.
              "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
              "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
              "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
              GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

              Comment


              • I have no idea how constitutionally sound her ruling is. But man, Trump has had a string of court wins lately.
                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                - SeattleUte

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                  I have no idea how constitutionally sound her ruling is. But man, Trump has had a string of court wins lately.
                  Yeah, maybe they are just trying to tell Grandpa Joe he should step down.
                  "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                  "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                  "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                  GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                    I have no idea how constitutionally sound her ruling is. But man, Trump has had a string of court wins lately.
                    I miss the boring days where former President's didn't need court wins.
                    Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
                    -General George S. Patton

                    I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
                    -DOCTOR Wuap

                    Comment


                    • she is not an independent judge. the only actions she has taken was for the purpose of delaying until it is close enough so they cant appeal.

                      Im sure someone will tell us how correct the judges are though and anyone who suggests judges are self interested and not following the consitution is a fool.

                      Comment


                      • LIke the title of this thread says:

                        "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                        "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                        - SeattleUte

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                          she is not an independent judge. the only actions she has taken was for the purpose of delaying until it is close enough so they cant appeal.

                          Im sure someone will tell us how correct the judges are though and anyone who suggests judges are self interested and not following the consitution is a fool.
                          She is awful and has been the whole time. But you are right judges are magically beyond reproach.

                          I'm sure Alito and Thomas will push for this issue and side with objectivity and case law.

                          With the "Biden Crime Family" stuff, it should be acknowledged that he didn't step in and get Hunter out of trouble. That is quite the contrast to Trump.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post

                            She is awful and has been the whole time. But you are right judges are magically beyond reproach.

                            I'm sure Alito and Thomas will push for this issue and side with objectivity and case law.

                            With the "Biden Crime Family" stuff, it should be acknowledged that he didn't step in and get Hunter out of trouble. That is quite the contrast to Trump.
                            Maybe Trump will nominate her for the next SCOTUS opening.
                            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post

                              Maybe Trump will nominate her for the next SCOTUS opening.
                              Could be what she's auditioning for.

                              Comment




                              • Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said Monday she thinks Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of former President Trump’s classified documents case could be a “blessing in disguise” for special counsel Jack Smith.

                                “Look, I think it’s a terrible decision. I think it’s absolutely wrong on the merits, but going forward I think this could actually be a blessing in disguise because it gives Jack Smith an opportunity to appeal the case immediately,” McQuade, an MSNBC legal analyst, said on the channel Monday morning, in an interview highlighted by Mediaite.

                                So many of these other decisions were within the judge’s discretion as she was slow-walking the case, but this is one where it’s immediately appealable,” McQuade continued. “And I think she is so clearly wrong on the law that the 11th Circuit will reverse.”

                                McQuade predicted Trump would likely then appeal the case to the Supreme Court, which ultimately might rule in Trump’s favor. Even if that happens, she said, “The case is not over.”

                                “All that means is a special counsel can’t bring this case,” McQuade continued. “There is nothing then to stop the U.S. attorney in the southern district of Florida from bringing this case.”

                                https://thehill.com/regulation/court...ed-jack-smith/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X