President Trump: Making America Great Again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BlueK
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 7112

    #20371
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post

    I don't care if the redactions paint Trump in a bad light or not. Trump and/or his underlings are not complying with the law. This should be an easy "Bad Trump" response.
    Trump was elected to do whatever he wants, exactly because it's known he won't follow all the laws. For those who like him, breaking whatever laws he wants is a feature, not a bug..

    Comment

    • Maximus
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 5997

      #20372
      Originally posted by Shaka View Post

      Cite them. I've perused the mainstream news sites. None of them report what you're alleging. I included two AI sources that aggregate the available informaiton. I'll take my, and my AI minions, research over your confirmation bias.
      Lol iow you cant accept criticism against trump.

      Comment

      • Maximus
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 5997

        #20373
        Originally posted by Shaka View Post

        Let's turn to Grok for more info:



        Not good enough? Let's turn to ChatGPT:

        ???? Was Trump’s name deliberately redacted from the release?

        Lmao . You do telaize chatgpt is just pasting what is online

        The fact you are using this as proof trump didnt redact stuff is amazingly naive.

        Comment

        • Shaka
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2008
          • 10432

          #20374
          Originally posted by Maximus View Post

          Lol iow you cant accept criticism against trump.
          Is this your default when I ask you to cite something other than your confirmation bias?

          What you allege is not true.

          Comment

          • Maximus
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 5997

            #20375
            Originally posted by Shaka View Post

            Is this your default when I ask you to cite something other than your confirmation bias?

            What you allege is not true.
            You are actually arguing that trump fidnt redact 90% because...he cares about victims. The dude who admitted to sexually harassing teenagers.

            Trumps connection. To epstein should make you 0% on trump and 100% on never trump IF morality was important at all.

            Comment

            • Shaka
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2008
              • 10432

              #20376
              Originally posted by Maximus View Post

              You are actually arguing that trump fidnt redact 90% because...he cares about victims. The dude who admitted to sexually harassing teenagers.

              Trumps connection. To epstein should make you 0% on trump and 100% on never trump IF morality and following the law were above politics

              Your sanctimony is hilarious to me.

              This is so dumb. If you were rich, a politician, or a socialite in NYC, there's a reasonable chance you've attended the same parties and been photographed with Epstein. I have a BYU graduate friend/beauty queen who runs in those circles. She gets invited to play in the celebrity golf/tennis tournaments because she is very attractive and can play those sports at a reasonable level. I haven't asked her about Epstein, but during her heyday, she was invited to many of those parties and was photographed with Trump and a bunch of other celebrities. Is she guilty by association? Hell, I've been on Lake Powell trips with someone who wound up on the FBI's ten most wanted list. Does this make me guilty by association?

              When it's all said and done, the Epstein files will be much ado about nothing. Epstein is many things, but dumb is not one of them. Smart criminals/sex traffickers probably aren't going to keep files around that are going to incriminate them. Sure, there will be black books, lists of contacts, some payment records, photographs at parties, etc... What's not there is actual physical evidence that Trump or anyone else other than Epstein and Maxwell participated in sex trafficking. Epstein and Maxwell were mostly taken down by witness testimony. Had there been any evidence that would take down Trump, the Biden administration would have released it.

              Comment

              • Maximus
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 5997

                #20377
                Originally posted by Shaka View Post


                Your sanctimony is hilarious to me.

                This is so dumb. If you were rich, a politician, or a socialite in NYC, there's a reasonable chance you've attended the same parties and been photographed with Epstein. I have a BYU graduate friend/beauty queen who runs in those circles. She gets invited to play in the celebrity golf/tennis tournaments because she is very attractive and can play those sports at a reasonable level. I haven't asked her about Epstein, but during her heyday, she was invited to many of those parties and was photographed with Trump and a bunch of other celebrities. Is she guilty by association? Hell, I've been on Lake Powell trips with someone who wound up on the FBI's ten most wanted list. Does this make me guilty by association?

                When it's all said and done, the Epstein files will be much ado about nothing. Epstein is many things, but dumb is not one of them. Smart criminals/sex traffickers probably aren't going to keep files around that are going to incriminate them. Sure, there will be black books, lists of contacts, some payment records, photographs at parties, etc... What's not there is actual physical evidence that Trump or anyone else other than Epstein and Maxwell participated in sex trafficking. Epstein and Maxwell were mostly taken down by witness testimony. Had there been any evidence that would take down Trump, the Biden administration would have released it.
                lol do all of these rich dudes who went with epstein have a history of commenting how they want to sleep with their teen taughter, history of bragging about going to see his teen contensts naked in the locker room, and a history of bragging about how people let you sexually assault them when you are rich?

                Hmm

                Comment

                • frank ryan
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 12257

                  #20378
                  Maybe hold off on the personal derision

                  Comment

                  • Shaka
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 10432

                    #20379
                    Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
                    Maybe hold off on the personal derision
                    The hypocrisy of this instruction is also hilarious to me.

                    Comment

                    • Northwestcoug
                      Cocked and Loaded
                      • May 2011
                      • 17887

                      #20380
                      Hey most males used to fantasize about GI Joe-level weaponry. But we also grew out of it:
                      Untitled.jpg
                      Bing bong, pew pew, whatever. How does anyone take this seriously?
                      "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                      "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                      - SeattleUte

                      Comment

                      • BlueK
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 7112

                        #20381
                        It's so important to deport 19 year old college students who came here when they were 8. Well, I guess it is for a government that has xenophobia as a core tenet.

                        Comment

                        • frank ryan
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 12257

                          #20382
                          Some emails were leaked before they zapped that mentioned 10 co-conspirators. References to Trump having made more flights than previously reported.

                          What a joke of a corrupt administration.

                          Comment

                          • frank ryan
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 12257

                            #20383
                            Bari Weiss killed a 60 minutes story hours before it aired. She is playing the role of censor for Trump and this is uncharted territory.

                            Comment

                            • BigPiney
                              Huge Member
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 12310

                              #20384
                              Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
                              Bari Weiss killed a 60 minutes story hours before it aired. She is playing the role of censor for Trump and this is uncharted territory.
                              Here is the segment: https://archive.org/details/insidececot

                              Comment

                              • Pelado
                                Bald not naked
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 21069

                                #20385
                                Disgusting.
                                "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                                - Goatnapper'96

                                Comment

                                Working...