The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck

[SeattleUte]

So who's out of the closet pro-Trump here so far? Venkman, Noah, Ted Nugent, BYU 71. Who else?

[SCcoug]

So who's out of the closet pro-Trump here so far? Venkman, Noah, Ted Nugent, BYU 71. Who else?

How is mbn's write in Mitt campaign pro-Trump?

[Topper]

18 U.S.C. 793(f)

Thanks. I will look it up.

[Topper]

So who's out of the closet pro-Trump here so far? Venkman, Noah, Ted Nugent, BYU 71. Who else?

You are wrong on two accounts.

Ted is anti-Trumpf and anti-Hillary. He pro-Gary Johnson, an imperfect candidate but at least he is not a complete loser.

I am trying to convince 71 from voting for Hillary and for Gary Johnson. Just because Trumpf sucks doesn't mean one needs to vote for Hillary. There is the third option of voting Libertarian or refraining from voting.

[Jeff Lebowski]

So who's out of the closet pro-Trump here so far? Venkman, Noah, Ted Nugent, BYU 71. Who else?

Shaka, imanihonjin.

[Jeff Lebowski]

Facebook is awesome today.

[Shaka]

Shaka, imanihonjin.

That's not true. I stated that I don't see a difference between voting for Hilary or Trump. They are both bad. Hilary might be worse.

I'm leaning 3rd party but am interested to see more clarification on Trumps cabinet and possible SCOTUS nominees.

[Jeff Lebowski]

That's not true. I stated that I don't see a difference between voting for Hilary or Trump. They are both bad. Hilary might be worse.

I'm leaning 3rd party but am interested to see more clarification on Trumps cabinet and possible SCOTUS nominees.

Admit it. You are trump-curious.

[creekster]

Admit it. You are trump-curious.

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

[Omaha 680]

You are wrong on two accounts.

Ted is anti-Trumpf and anti-Hillary. He pro-Gary Johnson, an imperfect candidate but at least he is not a complete loser.

I am trying to convince 71 from voting for Hillary and for Gary Johnson. Just because Trumpf sucks doesn't mean one needs to vote for Hillary. There is the third option of voting Libertarian or refraining from voting.

While Gary Johnson may be better than the two major party nominees, Im not ready to rule him out as also being a complete loser.

[Jeff Lebowski]

That's not true. I stated that I don't see a difference between voting for Hilary or Trump. They are both bad. Hilary might be worse.

I'm leaning 3rd party but am interested to see more clarification on Trumps cabinet and possible SCOTUS nominees.

Haha. Good old search function. You can't fool us, Mr. Trump Apologist. Man up and own it.

Frankly I don't see that much difference between Trump and most politicians. Most flip-flop like crazy, say whatever will get the most votes, and lie like crazy. The truth is no one knows what Trump will do in the Presidency because at different times he's staked out conflicting positions. Seriously the guy is the enigma candidate.

I will not vote for Trump in a primary but would consider him over Hilary. I see a Trump presidency going one of two ways: 1. Nothing gets done because of the gridlock he causes. 2. He will be the greatest Eff You president since Reagan and actually get something done with some out of the box thinking and the ability to straddle the center and bring the right and left together.

Trump appeals to a wide range of people simply because he isn't afraid to do what he wants.

And all of Mitt Romney's business ventures flourished.

Is it surprising that Trump has had some business failings? Most guys on that level have. You don't get to be a billionaire if all of your businesses fail. Trump is clearly very successful at business.

This idiot would most likely vote for Trump over Hilary. I see her as absolutely corrupt while I only see Trump as a buffoon. Neither is good.

Note to Creek: Trump's reality show was actually pretty good. If he brings that management style to the presidency then maybe he will not be so bad.

This is a legit reason to consider Trump. I've also been waiting for the list and look forward to reviewing the names. His choice of VP will also receive consideration.

In the general I think that Trump is the lesser of two evils and that's certainly not an unreasonable opinion.

I have no doubt that a great many Trump supporters are less intelligent. However that doesn't mean that there aren't intelligent people who support him. Also there's a a large element of middle class libertarian types who can't stand the candidates from either party and badly want things shaken up, even if it means the shake-up happens at the hands of Trump.

In the general I'd consider Trump over Hilary.

[Omaha 680]

So Trump is picking Gingrich as VP? LoL.

[Sleeping in EQ]

If this election were a movie, it would be Arthur II: On the Rocks.

Donald would be Dudley Moore and Hillary would be Liza Minnelli.

True to form, Donald's VP pick will be Hillary. This pick will take down the Internet.

[Applejack]

I'm leaning 3rd party but am interested to see more clarification on Trumps cabinet and possible SCOTUS nominees.

They will be the BEST!

[Topper]

So Trump is picking Gingrich as VP? LoL.

I don't know where you read that, but if step back and act as an adviser to Trump, heaven forbid, Gingrich makes the most sense. First, he would add credibility as he worked with Hillary's husband for the last time the two parties worked together and spent less than they usually do. Second, he knows how to work legislation and has street cred with the legislators. Third, he can raise money. Fourth, he won't have any future chances, so he won't damage his future as a candidate. Other names being floated might ruin her or his political career. Fifth, he knows how to fight.

Of the national names, he is the only one that makes sense, if you were providing guidance to the unguidable Trump.