The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • beefytee
    Board eye candy
    • Mar 2009
    • 7542

    #136
    I don't get the criticism.

    Even if you want to change the rules, you play by the rules until the rules change.

    There's nothing hypocritical about that.

    All of the financial criticism thrown Hillary's way right now seems really ticky-tack and reminds of the crap that was thrown Romney's way.

    Comment

    • imanihonjin
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 3772

      #137
      Originally posted by beefytee View Post
      I don't get the criticism.

      Even if you want to change the rules, you play by the rules until the rules change.

      There's nothing hypocritical about that.

      All of the financial criticism thrown Hillary's way right now seems really ticky-tack and reminds of the crap that was thrown Romney's way.
      Overall I agree with you. However, when dems start throwing around words like "the rich need to pay their fair share" I think it is more than appropriate to point out that nobody is prohibiting the rich dems like Hillary to pay their "fair share" to the government, whatever that means.

      Comment

      • Omaha 680
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 11159

        #138
        Originally posted by All-American View Post
        You're measuring income, not outgo. It wouldn't surprise me at all if money was going out at near the rate it is coming in. Those things that mean more than money can be very expensive.
        Right I get that. But most estimates of their net worth exceed $50M on the low end.

        Originally posted by beefytee View Post
        I don't get the criticism.

        Even if you want to change the rules, you play by the rules until the rules change.

        There's nothing hypocritical about that.

        All of the financial criticism thrown Hillary's way right now seems really ticky-tack and reminds of the crap that was thrown Romney's way.
        I agree. She could undercut the criticism by embracing how much they have made and making herself as an example of people who should pay more and have their tax shelters eliminated. Obama is a master at that. I don't agree with the policy but it plays with the masses.

        Comment

        • TripletDaddy
          sweet triple
          • Nov 2008
          • 58186

          #139
          Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
          Overall I agree with you. However, when dems start throwing around words like "the rich need to pay their fair share" I think it is more than appropriate to point out that nobody is prohibiting the rich dems like Hillary to pay their "fair share" to the government, whatever that means.
          You are a moran and possibly an idiot also, but I say this respectfully because I would like you to feel free to continue posting your inane blathering here!
          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

          sigpic

          Comment

          • byu71
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 22070

            #140
            There are as many rich dems as rich republicans. I have no problem with Hillary, Bill President Obama and others chasing after the big buck.

            I wonder why the dems are more successful at labeling repubs as fat cats. Probably because they are always promoting programs that appear to be anti-rich.

            It is just a philosophical difference. Dems believe in taxing and the government deciding who gets helped. Repubs believe in keeping more of the earnings and letting the individual decide who to help through charitable giving.

            Comment

            • imanihonjin
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 3772

              #141
              Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
              You are a moran and possibly an idiot also, but I say this respectfully because I would like you to feel free to continue posting your inane blathering here!
              Don't worry....the feelings are mutual.

              Comment

              • TripletDaddy
                sweet triple
                • Nov 2008
                • 58186

                #142
                Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
                Don't worry....the feelings are mutual.
                You also agree that you are a moran and an idiot. Then it's settled.
                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                sigpic

                Comment

                • Moliere
                  One man.....one pie
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 27760

                  #143
                  http://www.politico.com/story/2014/0...nd-108659.html

                  Cleveland is going to host the 2016 GOP convention. Does this mean that Portman does actually have some influence? Could Portman possibly run and win in 2016? I doubt it given his stance on gay marriage.....but weirder things have happened.

                  I liked this comment:

                  Some Republican donors privately said Texas, where the Republican Party recently made strong stands in its platform against gay rights and endorsing “reparative therapy” for gays, would send the wrong message at a time when the GOP needs to expand its base.

                  A critical component of the RNC’s “autopsy” after the 2012 election was the need to appeal to an increasingly diverse electorate. Holding the convention in a heavily African-American city provides a backdrop that helps the party avoid the appearance of homogeneity.
                  "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                  Comment

                  • dabrockster
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 10852

                    #144
                    A possible President with a case of minor cankles.. Not very appealing...

                    Last edited by dabrockster; 08-11-2014, 07:07 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Jeff Lebowski
                      Corporate lackey for Jesus
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 69404

                      #145
                      Originally posted by dabrockster View Post
                      A possible President with a case of minor cankles.. No very appealing...
                      Declasse.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment

                      • TripletDaddy
                        sweet triple
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 58186

                        #146
                        Also a little odd and out of character. Dabrockster, since when did you start making fat/body image jokes??
                        Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • dabrockster
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 10852

                          #147
                          Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                          Declasse.

                          Comment

                          • Moliere
                            One man.....one pie
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 27760

                            #148
                            Not sure I could vote for Hillary after seeing that picture :gross:
                            "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                            Comment

                            • dabrockster
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 10852

                              #149
                              Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                              Not sure I could vote for Hillary after seeing that picture :gross:
                              Mission accomplished..




                              May be out of character DDD, but desperate times calls for desperate measures...

                              Comment

                              • Pelado
                                Bald not naked
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 21065

                                #150
                                Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                                Not sure I could vote for Hillary before or after seeing that picture :gross:
                                fify
                                "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                                - Goatnapper'96

                                Comment

                                Working...