Originally posted by Bo Diddley
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Police Brutality Thread
Collapse
X
-
Absolutely. This is the essence of the problem. Let all reforms be based on improving these two facts."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
-
OK, assume the guy is armed in the first two cases.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostOf those three, the last one is where I have no qualms with an armed cop making a snap judgement. With the first two, I would hope the criminal could be subdued safely without killing him.
I agree that the majority of encounters aren't happening with 'army-like weaponry', but a lot of abuse happens when it does. Like no-knock and drug raids. And I'm sure you agree that encounters like your examples are relatively rare in a cop's day to day job. Where we really need reform is the disasters that happen from routine police interactions like traffic stops.
Sure, they are relatively rare. But they happen frequently enough."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Then I am OK with cops making a snap judgement in those instances.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostOK, assume the guy is armed in the first two cases.
Sure, they are relatively rare. But they happen frequently enough.
But these are not the examples we are seeing that has moved the needle towards police reform nationally. It's the cops who are using excessive violence against unarmed people. The ones who are too rash to pull a gun because they 'fear for their safety'. You know, when a suspect makes a 'quick' move towards his pocket during a routine traffic stop. Or shooting a fleeing suspect, like they did with Brooks, just because he grabbed a taser. We can and should demand better cop behavior."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
I am all for many of the reforms mentioned. But we started this discussion when you suggested we should *END* qualified immunity. I think that is a very bad idea. Scale it back maybe? Study it? Sure. End it? No way.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostThen I am OK with cops making a snap judgement in those instances.
But these are not the examples we are seeing that has moved the needle towards police reform nationally. It's the cops who are using excessive violence against unarmed people. The ones who are too rash to pull a gun because they 'fear for their safety'. You know, when a suspect makes a 'quick' move towards his pocket during a routine traffic stop. Or shooting a fleeing suspect, like they did with Brooks, just because he grabbed a taser. We can and should demand better cop behavior."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
My unqualified opinion is that in its current iteration qualified immunity does more harm than good, so I would like to see it ended. Like Pelado said, I think it ends up protecting more bad cops than good. And it fosters a bad perception of police interactions with both citizens and the police.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostI am all for many of the reforms mentioned. But we started this discussion when you suggested we should *END* qualified immunity. I think that is a very bad idea. Scale it back maybe? Study it? Sure. End it? No way.
I'm not sure how you would scale it back. If there's a reasonable way to do it that would lead to meaningful reform, then I will listen."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Why do you assume the perpetrator would be a man? Such misandry.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostOf those three, the last one is where I have no qualms with an armed cop making a snap judgement. With the first two, I would hope the criminal could be subdued safely without killing him.
I agree that the majority of encounters aren't happening with 'army-like weaponry', but a lot of abuse happens when it does. Like no-knock and drug raids. And I'm sure you agree that encounters like your examples are relatively rare in a cop's day to day job. Where we really need reform is the disasters that happen from routine police interactions like traffic stops."I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
Comment
-
Comment
-
Wow... I wonder why they are doing that.Originally posted by swampfrog View Post"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
You mean the cop with "You're f****d" etched into the side of his AR-15?Originally posted by Commando View PostI don't think I agree with this. That b*ch a** cop who killed the intoxicated man on his knees in the hall in the hotel in Mesa was surrounded by fellow cops and backup yet chose to murder that poor man anyway.Last edited by BigFatMeanie; 06-17-2020, 06:44 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by swampfrog View Post
People of Atlanta... Please remember we are in the middle of a pandemic:
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Can we duplicate this in Seattle so the fuckwad Police Chief and Mayor get sacked?Originally posted by swampfrog View Post
Asking for a friend.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by dabrockster View PostCan we duplicate this in Seattle so the fuckwad Police Chief and Mayor get sacked?
Asking for a friend.
Seattle is having its summer of love!
Hey, maybe Rep. Jerry Nader could make a congressional visit to CHAZ/CHOP and return & report:
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Official channels denying walkout and that there were a high number of call outs (which I assume means unable to make it into work).
The inability to get information that can be trusted is making these situations impossible to get a handle on.
Spin, spin, spin.
Comment
-
Forget Antifa, the real threat is the boogaloo bois. They come armed and ready. Also, they used the protests to incite violence.Originally posted by myboynoah View PostYeah, they were dumb for not bringing shotguns.
Antifa, the worst armed terrorist organization in the world.
As Trump warns of leftist violence, a dangerous threat emerges from the right-wing boogaloo movement
BB15DdsK.jpgOne boogaloo supporter, Steven Carrillo, an active-duty Air Force staff sergeant, is charged with killing a security guard at the federal courthouse in Oakland last month. Court documents allege he scrawled the word “Boog” in blood on a car he had stolen.
“The numbers are overwhelming: Most of the violence is coming from the extreme right wing,” said Clint Watts, a former FBI agent who studies extremist political activity for the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a think tank in Philadelphia.
The shooting that killed one security guard and injured another took place May 29, near where demonstrators had gathered to protest the police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, in Minneapolis.
Facebook posts also figure in Carrillo’s prosecution, with court documents quoting one attributed to him: “Use their anger to fuel our fire. Think outside the box. We have mobs of angry people to use to our advantage.”Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
Comment