Originally posted by Northwestcoug
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The June 1
Collapse
X
-
An hour? That's more church discussion than I've had at church the last three weeks combined.Originally posted by imanihonjin View PostNope....I don't care enough to listen to an hour long conversation which isn't really going to clear much up as it is only one side of the story being told."I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
Comment
-
Crap, are you telling me I get more church discussion than you?Originally posted by Pelado View PostAn hour? That's more church discussion than I've had at church the last three weeks combined.
I really need to think this inactivity thing through..."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Who is this John Larsen character?Originally posted by Pheidippides View PostA bunch of new information this morning. First, John Dehlin says that his SP swears this is a local action spearheaded by John's former EQP who is now on the high council. I find that somewhat hard to believe (a high councilor spearheading a disciplinary council? Somebody with more experience there should weigh in.) but I'm not sure that make it any less disturbing. Kate said that at least one member of the presidency of the seventy was aware of the proceedings in her case prior to any publicity, and that she went public only because her SP was going to if she didn't. And then throw Rock Waterman in the mix - yeah, I'm not buying that this is a local act. (Kate's SP sounds like the worst kind of asshole, although we are just getting her side of the story).
And now John Larsen is also out there talking smack about Dehlin and insinuating hypocrisy. But I think John Larsen is the most narcissistic of all of the podcasters, so it's a bit of the pot calling the kettle black here - not that it makes the accusation untrue. It seems that the drama is just as much of an issue for the ex/fringe mo podcasting world as it is for the church generally, if not more.
There is one thing that I think sets Kate and her situation apart completely here, however. Dehlin has been very open about his nonbelief, and this is not his first go-round with disciplinary proceedings. I don't know what he gets from his continued participation, although I know that his kids are pretty active in YW, speak in church, etc. Perhaps it's a place of comfort for him. Perhaps it enhances his brand name and income (if you want to be cynical) or his ability to help others deal with disaffection, in or out (if you don't want to be cynical). Rock has also openly said that he thinks the current iteration of the church is far afield of where it should be and needs to come back to original/sound principles, and that he doesn't care about excommunication because it's just a meaningless piece of paper. The action against them surprises me a little in that I think the wisest course of action is to not pay attention to them when they go off (some of you need to learn the same lesson about cougjunkie), but other than that I can't say I'm too shocked.
Kate, however, is a true believer. I'm convinced of this. I don't think it's logical, and my wife has stated a couple of times that she just doesn't realize that she doesn't believe yet, but regardless she believes this to be the One True Church. And she's trying to operate within the parameters she has in that light. This is why the action against her surprises me quite a bit - but I guess not really, because she's the only one who truly values her membership and hence is the only one really likely to back down at all with the threat of punishment. However, I can't think of a better way to galvanize a movement than to make the leader a martyr (there have been 75 new profiles on OW since the news broke, a massive increase), and you would think the church of all organizations would understand this.
Today on RadioWest Dehlin reputedly compared the church to a dirty shirt, called it a billion dollar organization, and said this is why you don't have 80 year old men run it (I didn't listen). He also said that Monson suffers from dementia. While I agree with him generally (other than the billion dollar thing - that's several magnitudes too small), I think he probably just committed suicide-by-cop. Kate, on the other hand, was reputedly very sympathetic and broke down into tears (as she's done in a couple of other interviews). Excommunicating her would be a huge mistake.
had a similar thought.Originally posted by Pheidippides View PostYour vouch for him is doing him no favors. FYI.
I'm aware of an instance where an apostle suggested that a sp convene a court on someone and the sp decided against it.Originally posted by All-American View PostNot being a party to these conversations, I wonder whether a stake president might not feel at liberty to decide against initiating disciplinary proceedings when an Apostle of The Lord Jesus Christ calls him and suggests that maybe he might want to think about considering it.
Comment
-
technically it's an hour and 22 minutes. so about the length of your average fast and testimony meeting. It included a travelogue and the word thankinomy too. If somebody had the authority to bless the sacrament it could have been a full church service, but one guy there shirked his priesthood duty.Originally posted by Pelado View PostAn hour? That's more church discussion than I've had at church the last three weeks combined.Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
-
So you are a biblical literalist? Wow.Originally posted by Eddie View PostWhy? I don't think it changes anything.
I don't think the priesthood is a requirement for healing or performing miracles. Well - let me take that back. I don't think priesthood keys or authority are needed. I'd have to think a little harder before going beyond that.
I don't have a problem with women receiving revelation and/or following the spirit and bearing testimony or even providing some leadership - though I seem to recall women being more prophet and less leader in the church, but who knows why that is or even if I'm understanding what I read correctly. The killing, the slavery, etc. Yep. It all happened on God's watch and He even advocated some of it.
I think that's my whole point. Perhaps you missed it. That stuff doesn't bother me."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Good for that SP. I would hope most leaders would be brave enough to do that if they thought the facts did not merit discipline.Originally posted by frank ryan View PostI'm aware of an instance where an apostle suggested that a sp convene a court on someone and the sp decided against it.τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν
Comment
-
That's an awesome picture and a very sweet op-ed, quoting a primary song back to them. She's got the fusion of panache and earnestness down pat and will annihilate them in the PR battle.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...rch-ordinationWhen a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
It is an awful picture. What kind of news source uses the worst picture their photog got? If the cameraperson didn't get one where she was mid-speaking with her mouth wide open, then they are really bad at their job. There are probably cell phone pictures better than that of her news conference.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostThat's an awesome picture and a very sweet op-ed, quoting a primary song back to them. She's got the fusion of panache and earnestness down pat and will annihilate them in the PR battle.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...rch-ordination
In fact, here is a vastly superior photo from the photogs flickr page.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/104442...n/photostream/Last edited by HuskyFreeNorthwest; 06-16-2014, 03:52 PM.Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
I had a meeting with a woman that works for me today. I was out of town last week, so we hadn't spoken in a while. I was surprised that one of the first things she said was something like "Hey, I saw that you guys are excommunicating women who want the priesthood". I asked where she saw it, and she said it was on the main page of her Fox News feed she gets on her phone. I'll admit that she is a bit of an outlier for several reasons. She has a Mormon boss, her husband was an active member for several years growing up, and I had previously told her about my sister who is somewhat active in the OW stuff. Still, I was a bit surprised that someone in North Carolina who makes absolutely no effort to search out Mormon news knew about it.
Comment
-
Would you go so far as to say that this is going to be a PR nightmare for the Church?Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostThat's an awesome picture and a very sweet op-ed, quoting a primary song back to them. She's got the fusion of panache and earnestness down pat and will annihilate them in the PR battle.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...rch-ordination"I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
Comment