Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ward Boundaries Changed
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostGod picked a number and we're going with it.
There are more baptisms than one, so you are limited in that regard.Originally posted by wuapinmon View PostWhat would you propose otherwise? It's a standard, not a mandate. Nothing is going to happen to someone if they want to wait or the child wants to wait. There is no penalty.
Which one? The one who appeared to Joe?Originally posted by SoonerCoug View PostDo you believe that Nephi was a real person? Just curious.
Comment
-
Why don't you answer the question? Why do you believe in the Book of Mormon? What are your beliefs?Originally posted by DWhitmer View Post
There are more baptisms than one, so you are limited in that regard.
Which one? The one who appeared to Joe?
Rather than doing a drive-by attack on Mormonism/the LDS church, why don't you lay out what YOU believe so there can be some discussion, debate and, hopefully, understanding?
Your way of doing this is a bit gutless.
Comment
-
If I share too much I'll accused of trying to sway others. If you lead I will follow. The long and the short of my view hinges on the Holy Book of Mormon and the Holy Bible.Originally posted by Portland Ute View PostWhy don't you answer the question? Why do you believe in the Book of Mormon? What are your beliefs?
Rather than doing a drive-by attack on Mormonism/the LDS church, why don't you lay out what YOU believe so there can be some discussion, debate and, hopefully, understanding?
Your way of doing this is a bit gutless.
Joe never received a mandate to start a church, he was only tasked with bring forth the Holy Book of Mormon. Had he been ordained to be a prophet/leader he would have retained use of the Urim and Thummim.
Mandating an age when all people should repent is ludicrous, no offense.
Here is what the D&C says reg. child baptism:
41 And you must preach unto the world, saying: You must repent and be baptized, in the name of Jesus Christ;
42 For all men must repent and be baptized, and not only men, but women, and children who have arrived at the years of accountability. (D&C 18, June 1829 - correct principle, no age mandate = GOOD)
70 Every member of the church of Christ having children is to bring them unto the elders before the church, who are to lay their hands upon them in the name of Jesus Christ, and bless them in his name.
71 No one can be received into the church of Christ unless he has arrived unto the years of accountability before God, and is capable of repentance [sin].
72 Baptism is to be administered in the following manner unto all those who repent— (D&C 20, April 1830) [Baptism of repentance is required to become a member of his church = CONFUSED]
25 And again, inasmuch as parents have children in Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized, that teach them not to understand the doctrine of repentance, faith in Christ the Son of the living God, and of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of the hands, when eight years old, the sin be upon the heads of the parents.
26 For this shall be a law unto the inhabitants of Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized.
27 And their children shall be baptized for the remission of their sins when eight years old, and receive the laying on of the hands.
28 And they shall also teach their children to pray, and to walk uprightly before the Lord. (D&C 68, Nov. 1831) [2 yrs later the repentance/baptismal age was given = BAD!]
I hope that clarifies where/why I had to draw the line.
Comment
-
I am so happy that you are on this site. You are a perfect example of the absurdity of certainty when it comes to matters of faith. You are just as dogmatic as many Mormons, but you have your own nutcase twist on everything. It's fantastic. Thank you.Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostJoe never received a mandate to start a church, he was only tasked with bring forth the Holy Book of Mormon. Had he been ordained to be a prophet/leader he would have retained use of the Urim and Thummim.That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
-
Are you unable to suspend disbelief?Originally posted by SoonerCoug View PostI am so happy that you are on this site. You are a perfect example of the absurdity of certainty when it comes to matters of faith. You are just as dogmatic as many Mormons, but you have your own nutcase twist on everything. It's fantastic. Thank you.
Comment
-
LOL.Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostAre you unable to suspend disbelief?That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
-
I was under the impression that Joe used a seer stone and a hat to translate the Holy Book of Mormon because the Urim and Thummim was taken away (shortly after the 116 pages were lost) and never returned. The seer stone that was used was found in a well that Joe was digging. Here is what the other David Whitmer said about the translation process:Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostJoe never received a mandate to start a church, he was only tasked with bring forth the Holy Book of Mormon. Had he been ordained to be a prophet/leader he would have retained use of the Urim and Thummim.
So the Holy Book of Mormon that we have wasn't translated by the Urim and Thummim but by a seer stone (found in a well) and a hat. Sorry, I just wanted to clear that up. Go on.I will now give you a description of the manner in which the Book of Mormon was translated. Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Are you a polygamist?Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostIf I share too much I'll accused of trying to sway others. If you lead I will follow. The long and the short of my view hinges on the Holy Book of Mormon and the Holy Bible.
Joe never received a mandate to start a church, he was only tasked with bring forth the Holy Book of Mormon. Had he been ordained to be a prophet/leader he would have retained use of the Urim and Thummim.
Mandating an age when all people should repent is ludicrous, no offense.
Here is what the D&C says reg. child baptism:
41 And you must preach unto the world, saying: You must repent and be baptized, in the name of Jesus Christ;
42 For all men must repent and be baptized, and not only men, but women, and children who have arrived at the years of accountability. (D&C 18, June 1829 - correct principle, no age mandate = GOOD)
70 Every member of the church of Christ having children is to bring them unto the elders before the church, who are to lay their hands upon them in the name of Jesus Christ, and bless them in his name.
71 No one can be received into the church of Christ unless he has arrived unto the years of accountability before God, and is capable of repentance [sin].
72 Baptism is to be administered in the following manner unto all those who repent— (D&C 20, April 1830) [Baptism of repentance is required to become a member of his church = CONFUSED]
25 And again, inasmuch as parents have children in Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized, that teach them not to understand the doctrine of repentance, faith in Christ the Son of the living God, and of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of the hands, when eight years old, the sin be upon the heads of the parents.
26 For this shall be a law unto the inhabitants of Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized.
27 And their children shall be baptized for the remission of their sins when eight years old, and receive the laying on of the hands.
28 And they shall also teach their children to pray, and to walk uprightly before the Lord. (D&C 68, Nov. 1831) [2 yrs later the repentance/baptismal age was given = BAD!]
I hope that clarifies where/why I had to draw the line.
Comment
-
But baptism is a saving ordinance that is about more than just mere repentance, isn't it? I find it highly amusing that you're taking issue with the same person that helped bring us the Book of Mormon (Moroni 8:9) as the person that helped bring us the Doctrine and Covenants (D&C 68:27).Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostIf I share too much I'll accused of trying to sway others. If you lead I will follow. The long and the short of my view hinges on the Holy Book of Mormon and the Holy Bible.
Joe never received a mandate to start a church, he was only tasked with bring forth the Holy Book of Mormon. Had he been ordained to be a prophet/leader he would have retained use of the Urim and Thummim.
Mandating an age when all people should repent is ludicrous, no offense.
Here is what the D&C says reg. child baptism:
41 And you must preach unto the world, saying: You must repent and be baptized, in the name of Jesus Christ;
42 For all men must repent and be baptized, and not only men, but women, and children who have arrived at the years of accountability. (D&C 18, June 1829 - correct principle, no age mandate = GOOD)
70 Every member of the church of Christ having children is to bring them unto the elders before the church, who are to lay their hands upon them in the name of Jesus Christ, and bless them in his name.
71 No one can be received into the church of Christ unless he has arrived unto the years of accountability before God, and is capable of repentance [sin].
72 Baptism is to be administered in the following manner unto all those who repent— (D&C 20, April 1830) [Baptism of repentance is required to become a member of his church = CONFUSED]
25 And again, inasmuch as parents have children in Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized, that teach them not to understand the doctrine of repentance, faith in Christ the Son of the living God, and of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying on of the hands, when eight years old, the sin be upon the heads of the parents.
26 For this shall be a law unto the inhabitants of Zion, or in any of her stakes which are organized.
27 And their children shall be baptized for the remission of their sins when eight years old, and receive the laying on of the hands.
28 And they shall also teach their children to pray, and to walk uprightly before the Lord. (D&C 68, Nov. 1831) [2 yrs later the repentance/baptismal age was given = BAD!]
I hope that clarifies where/why I had to draw the line.
Comment
-
The Holy Book of Mormon was translated (and I use that loosely) by the gift and power of God, meaning, sure Joe had a gift for scrying, but a special anointing was granted to access a higher dimension where the English translation was already done. Joe dictated, he did not translate.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostSo the Holy Book of Mormon that we have wasn't translated by the Urim and Thummim but by a seer stone (found in a well) and a hat. Sorry, I just wanted to clear that up. Go on.
The process involved humility and prayer, i.e. if thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.
Comment
-
I like your thinking.Originally posted by Viking View PostAre you a polygamist?
I believe as the holy record does - it is an abomination before God. Anyone claiming spiritual insights should have discerned that early on. Joe should have never taken advantage of girls in his house and he should not have justified by tying polygamy to (Christian) salvation/(Mormon) exaltation.
In fact, no polygamist can hold a church office (which has been ignored):
Bishops, the husband of one wife -1 Tim. 3:2
Elders, the husband of one wife -Titus 1:6
Deacons, the husband of one wife -1 Tim. 3:12
Comment
-
ok, we have a troll. go eat shit.Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostI like your thinking.
I believe as the holy record does - it is an abomination before God. Anyone claiming spiritual insights should have discerned that early on. Joe should have never taken advantage of girls in his house and he should not have justified by tying polygamy to (Christian) salvation/(Mormon) exaltation.
In fact, no polygamist can hold a church office (which has been ignored):
Bishops, the husband of one wife -1 Tim. 3:2
Elders, the husband of one wife -Titus 1:6
Deacons, the husband of one wife -1 Tim. 3:12
Comment
-
So why did Joseph need the U & T to "translate" the first 116 pages if the translation was already done. Couldn't he just have used the stone he found in the well to do those pages too?Originally posted by DWhitmer View PostThe Holy Book of Mormon was translated (and I use that loosely) by the gift and power of God, meaning, sure Joe had a gift for scrying, but a special anointing was granted to access a higher dimension where the English translation was already done. Joe dictated, he did not translate.
The process involved humility and prayer, i.e. if thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment

Comment