Now THAT's a facelift:

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Donuthole
    Official Outgayer
    • Nov 2008
    • 25238

    #16
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Come on. You have to admit that these are special cases.
    IMO, there will be about 50-60 "special cases" here in about 20 years.



    In other words, I'm not a fan of the mini-temple design that has been used all too frequently for the last decade or so.
    Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

    There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

    Comment

    • jay santos
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 13652

      #17
      Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
      Come on. You have to admit that these are special cases.
      Who's to say the current style won't look equally dated and gaudy in 50 years? I'm one of the handful of people married in the Provo temple, so it's personal for me.

      Comment

      • Fiyero
        Banned
        • Nov 2008
        • 5266

        #18
        Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
        IMO, there will be about 50-60 "special cases" here in about 20 years.



        In other words, I'm not a fan of the mini-temple design that has been used all too frequently for the last decade or so.
        Most of the smaller ward and branch meetinghouses are "phase 1" buildings that can be later expanded into "phase 2" and "phase 3" as the numbers grow. I inquired whether the smaller temples were built the same way and was told no, if the work increases and the temple is overloaded, they'll just build more and more of them.

        I can't imagine that the expense of giving a smaller temple a facelift just because, would be cost effective in the long run.

        Comment

        • Jeff Lebowski
          Corporate lackey for Jesus
          • Nov 2008
          • 69582

          #19
          Originally posted by jay santos View Post
          Who's to say the current style won't look equally dated and gaudy in 50 years? I'm one of the handful of people married in the Provo temple, so it's personal for me.
          Could be. But I thought the designs in this case looked goofy from day one.
          "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
          "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
          "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

          Comment

          • beelzebabette
            Golf & Cubs Disrespecter
            • Nov 2008
            • 2907

            #20
            Originally posted by jay santos View Post
            Who's to say the current style won't look equally dated and gaudy in 50 years? I'm one of the handful of people married in the Provo temple, so it's personal for me.
            I know it came up earlier this week (http://www.cougaruteforum.com/showthread.php?t=19016), but I'm curious what you thought of the change to the new steeple.

            Comment

            • TripletDaddy
              sweet triple
              • Nov 2008
              • 58186

              #21
              When is someone going to redesign this racially biased design



              I always get a kick out of this temple. For whatever reason, the Mexico temple was made to look like an Aztec temple. Because, you know, Mexicans wants their buildings to look like aztec temples.

              I wonder why the Swiss temple didn't look like a ski lodge?
              Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

              sigpic

              Comment

              • Donuthole
                Official Outgayer
                • Nov 2008
                • 25238

                #22
                Originally posted by Fiyero View Post
                Most of the smaller ward and branch meetinghouses are "phase 1" buildings that can be later expanded into "phase 2" and "phase 3" as the numbers grow. I inquired whether the smaller temples were built the same way and was told no, if the work increases and the temple is overloaded, they'll just build more and more of them.

                I can't imagine that the expense of giving a smaller temple a facelift just because, would be cost effective in the long run.
                I can't either, but it doesn't mean the old ones won't be a bit of an eye sore.
                Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                Comment

                • RobinFinderson
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 10548

                  #23
                  Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                  When is someone going to redesign this racially biased design



                  I always get a kick out of this temple. For whatever reason, the Mexico temple was made to look like an Aztec temple. Because, you know, Mexicans wants their buildings to look like aztec temples.

                  I wonder why the Swiss temple didn't look like a ski lodge?


                  Very slim resemblance. The square door, the canted walls evoke the ancient base, and there is the texture. Also, I'd bet Mexicans would be more inclined to accept a temple design that honored cultural elements from the people's history. You see problems with that?

                  Comment

                  • Soccermom
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 4063

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                    Come on. You have to admit that these are special cases.
                    I hope they don't touch the Provo temple. Changing the steeple was enough of a change for me -- of course, I have a bias in that I was married there. But, the temple is structurally sound, it functions according to its intended purposes, so why use funds to make a cosmetic change? What would that teach me about plastic surgery? That when I look outdated, I should get a facelift?

                    Comment

                    • beelzebabette
                      Golf & Cubs Disrespecter
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 2907

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Soccermom View Post
                      I hope they don't touch the Provo temple. Changing the steeple was enough of a change for me -- of course, I have a bias in that I was married there. But, the temple is structurally sound, it functions according to its intended purposes, so why use funds to make a cosmetic change? What would that teach me about plastic surgery? That when I look outdated, I should get a facelift?

                      Comment

                      • TripletDaddy
                        sweet triple
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 58186

                        #26
                        Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post


                        Very slim resemblance. The square door, the canted walls evoke the ancient base, and there is the texture. Also, I'd bet Mexicans would be more inclined to accept a temple design that honored cultural elements from the people's history. You see problems with that?
                        I'm not offended by it but I do think it would be less of a discussion point if the Church had built other temples around the world that were similar in cultural effect.

                        The Laie temple doesn't really look very Hawaiian.

                        The Swiss temple doesn't look Swiss.

                        The French temple doesn't seem to evoke much of France's history.

                        The Lamanite temple looks very disneyland-ish, though. Also, do we have any RMs that served in Mexico City? I recall the architecture there being more spanish colonial or european, not aztec influenced. i could be wrong on that.

                        an example (check out the lamanites in the pic!):

                        Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • TripletDaddy
                          sweet triple
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 58186

                          #27
                          Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post


                          Very slim resemblance. The square door, the canted walls evoke the ancient base, and there is the texture. Also, I'd bet Mexicans would be more inclined to accept a temple design that honored cultural elements from the people's history. You see problems with that?
                          also, this sentence was really what I was getting at. Because, you know, mexicans like aztec stuff. and velvet paintings. and chiclets.
                          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • Jeff Lebowski
                            Corporate lackey for Jesus
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 69582

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Soccermom View Post
                            I hope they don't touch the Provo temple. Changing the steeple was enough of a change for me -- of course, I have a bias in that I was married there. But, the temple is structurally sound, it functions according to its intended purposes, so why use funds to make a cosmetic change? What would that teach me about plastic surgery? That when I look outdated, I should get a facelift?
                            lol.
                            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                            Comment

                            • creekster
                              It is NOT a monkey!
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 22661

                              #29
                              Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                              also, this sentence was really what I was getting at. Because, you know, mexicans like aztec stuff. and velvet paintings. and chiclets.
                              I see your point, but do you know if any mexican church officials had input into the design? I don't know either way.
                              PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                              Comment

                              • venkman
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 2199

                                #30
                                The ugliness of the Provo/Ogden temples is part of their appeal.

                                I can understand the benefit of architectural correlation, but can't we leave the old funky stuff alone?
                                "Remember to double tap"

                                Comment

                                Working...