Originally posted by mpfunk
View Post
2014 College Football Season
Collapse
X
-
Yes, Utah's nail-biter victory over their bitter rival proved that they should move up two spots. It's clear that the committee doesn't put much thought into anything beyond the top 10 or so. I can't blame them.Originally posted by mpfunk View Post6 Pac 12 teams ranked in the top 25. Such a mediocre conference.
Utes move up to 23 and USC in at 25. Arizona into the top 10.
Comment
-
The PAC-12 is, of course, a very good conference but that seems like a favorable set of rankings for that conference. Not that it is perfect (although it tends to have better predictive power than anything but markov chain models that take into account intra game scoring), but here is a pure MOV ranking of the PAC-12 teams (my own so it doesn't do any post model human adjustment to the ratings):Originally posted by mpfunk View Post6 Pac 12 teams ranked in the top 25. Such a mediocre conference.
Utes move up to 23 and USC in at 25. Arizona into the top 10.
Code:Rank Team Rating W L 6 Oregon 96.546 11 1 16 Southern Cal 87.702 8 4 22 UCLA 86.330 9 3 24 Arizona 85.647 10 2 28 Stanford 84.208 7 5 31 Arizona St 83.066 9 3 35 Utah 80.388 8 4 40 Washington 78.988 8 5 54 California 74.433 5 7 74 Washington St 69.196 3 9 82 Oregon St 67.536 5 7 83 Colorado 66.808 2 10
Comment
-
I just noticed they have 9-3 UCLA above 10-2 Missouri, the SEC East champ. Condi with her PAC-12 bias strong arming the committee.Originally posted by pelagius View PostThe PAC-12 is, of course, a very good conference but that seems like a favorable set of rankings for that conference. Not that it is perfect (although it tends to have better predictive power than anything but markov chain models that take into account intra game scoring), but here is a pure MOV ranking of the PAC-12 teams (my own so it doesn't do any post model human adjustment to the ratings):
Code:Rank Team Rating W L 6 Oregon 96.546 11 1 16 Southern Cal 87.702 8 4 22 UCLA 86.330 9 3 24 Arizona 85.647 10 2 28 Stanford 84.208 7 5 31 Arizona St 83.066 9 3 35 Utah 80.388 8 4 40 Washington 78.988 8 5 54 California 74.433 5 7 74 Washington St 69.196 3 9 82 Oregon St 67.536 5 7 83 Colorado 66.808 2 10
Comment
-
Looks low for Oregon and Arizona and high for USC. Arizona is a better team today than they were early in the season when the just squeaked by some pretty bad teams (UTSA, Nevada, and Cal).Originally posted by pelagius View PostThe PAC-12 is, of course, a very good conference but that seems like a favorable set of rankings for that conference. Not that it is perfect (although it tends to have better predictive power than anything but markov chain models that take into account intra game scoring), but here is a pure MOV ranking of the PAC-12 teams (my own so it doesn't do any post model human adjustment to the ratings):
Code:Rank Team Rating W L 6 Oregon 96.546 11 1 16 Southern Cal 87.702 8 4 22 UCLA 86.330 9 3 24 Arizona 85.647 10 2 28 Stanford 84.208 7 5 31 Arizona St 83.066 9 3 35 Utah 80.388 8 4 40 Washington 78.988 8 5 54 California 74.433 5 7 74 Washington St 69.196 3 9 82 Oregon St 67.536 5 7 83 Colorado 66.808 2 10
Comment
-
Sure, all models are false. Although, I suspect it's more likely that Oregon and Arizona are both a bit overrated by the conventional/human polls.Originally posted by wapiti View PostLooks low for Oregon and Arizona and high for USC. Arizona is a better team today than they were early in the season when the just squeaked by some pretty bad teams (UTSA, Nevada, and Cal).Last edited by pelagius; 12-02-2014, 11:41 PM.
Comment
-
Most of the talk yesterday in the coaching profession centered around Florida, Michigan, UAB and recruiting.
Per sources, Nebraska is targeting Arkansas Bret Bielema and is in serious talks with him. Eichorst and Bielema has an extensive relationship from their time at Wisconsin and from what we hear this got serious quick.
Comment
-
Rumor denied by a couple of sources at ESPN and by Bielema himself.Originally posted by scottie View Post
I don't really like the smugness of Beilema but he would have been a good hire for Nebraska. I've read that Kyle Whittingham is being considered. Not that he has been contacted only he's a prime target. From what I've heard about Nebraska's AD, I would be surprised if news of Nebraska's next HC is leaked too much before the official announcement.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
That's weird. Coaches usually admit when they're in talks with other schools.Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostRumor denied by a couple of sources at ESPN and by Bielema himself.
I don't really like the smugness of Beilema but he would have been a good hire for Nebraska. I've read that Kyle Whittingham is being considered. Not that he has been contacted only he's a prime target. From what I've heard about Nebraska's AD, I would be surprised if news of Nebraska's next HC is leaked too much before the official announcement.So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.
Comment
-
-
-
I wonder if the wife he met playing blackjack in Vegas views Nebraska as a downgrade. It is hard for a guy making a lot of money to meet attractive women in Vegas.Originally posted by cougjunkie View PostEspecially the Bielemas. They seem to have a solid track record of honesty.Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
CSU pres is refusing to budge on the buyout for McElwain. Hilarious.
Comment
-
I like it, what's the point of a buyout if everyone just agrees to lower or eliminate it?Originally posted by YOhio View PostCSU pres is refusing to budge on the buyout for McElwain. Hilarious.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/...te-rams-buyoutGet confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
Especially when the buyout would about equal CSU's TV revenue for half a decade. If Florida ends up paying the total amount they'll have shelled out $13.5M in buyouts, including Muschamps severance.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostI like it, what's the point of a buyout if everyone just agrees to lower or eliminate it?
Comment
Comment