If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Meh, just own it. Your team benefited from the call. So what?It looked like a catch and TD to me. It was a close call. Too close to overturn from the referee's call on the field. The video evidence was not indisputable.
Exactly. It happens to fans all the time. It's okay
I'm your huckleberry.
"I love pulling the bone. Really though, what guy doesn't?" - CJF
That's not how it works. The receiver must maintain possession throughout the catch. Furthermore, you'll notice that the ball isn't even in the receiver's hands when the ball hits the ground, but between his forearms. Nobody is saying that it isn't a very close call, but according to the rules as written, that's not a catch.
I for one would love to see that rule clarified after a much more firmly controlled TD catch by Michigan against Iowa was also ruled incomplete, but under the current rules, no way that's a catch.
How is it determined when the catch begins and ends? Did his left elbow touching the ground cause the ball to move? Had it been his knee that touched first rather than his elbow, would that have been different?
As for the rules, doesn't it have to be irrefutable video evidence to overturn a call? If so, that didn't meet the standard, IMO.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Does the rule states that the ball has to be in the receivers hands to be deemed a catch? Is the ball in control at the time the ball hit the ground? Did the receivers left elbow strike the ground first? Answer the questions honestly, without your Wolverine goggles on.
I promise I have no Wolverine goggles on. The rule only states that the ball must be "firmly controlled"; whether the ball moved or not is simply a convenient proxy that is often used, since I don't know how else you could make such a judgement. Since the ball clearly moved when it hit the ground, that indicates that it wasn't firmly controlled. Yes, the receiver's left elbow definitely hit the ground first; that's not what's at issue here.
Let me also add, that game was not good or great. If one more person tells me that was such a good game I may explode. Just because a game is decided on the last play doesn't make up for 60 minutes of really shitty football.
For those sympathetic to VT, you should really be bitching about the game-winning FG. The kicker false-started. It isn't often called, but the refs would have been completely justified to do so.
Let me also add, that game was not good or great. If one more person tells me that was such a good game I may explode. Just because a game is decided on the last play doesn't make up for 60 minutes of really shitty football.
That's something we can all agree on. Michigan's offense looked like garbage, and their defense seemed to go to sleep any time it was 3rd or 4th and long.
VT fans are annoying. It's kind of funny to hear them bitch this morning at work.
You should point out that if the regular kicker would stop breaking and entering, VaTech their team might have had another shot at winning in a 2nd OT.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
For those sympathetic to VT, you should really be bitching about the game-winning FG. The kicker false-started. It isn't often called, but the refs would have been completely justified to do so.
I'm neither for nor against Mich. or VaTech. I'm just calling it like I see it. But as I pointed out in my post to Surfah, if the regular kicker wasn't a criminal, the FG may have been good.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment