Non-Conference Scheduling rumors

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • New Mexican Disaster
    Suomalainen
    • Nov 2008
    • 4549

    #2326
    Originally posted by OSUCougar View Post
    Okay, so please provide a SERIOUS reason for Utah not wanting to play BYU.
    Why would a school that is in a larger pond acknowledge a school that is left behind, when they compete with them for recruits?

    That seems like a good enough reason to me.

    Comment

    • YOhio
      Hipster Mode
      • Nov 2008
      • 26165

      #2327
      Is StDSU staying in the MWC going to screw up our schedule next season? It seems like there's a lot of chatter about changing the date of the Hawaii game.

      Comment

      • Eddie
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 8098

        #2328
        Originally posted by New Mexican Disaster View Post
        Why would a school that is in a larger pond acknowledge a school that is left behind, when they compete with them for recruits?

        That seems like a good enough reason to me.
        I may be off on my definitions. But declining to play a school because you are in a larger pond and don't want to compete for recruits sounds like it might actually fit into the description of what it means to marginalize.

        And I have it on good - if not great - authority above the Utah does NOT want to marginalize BYU.

        At least I understand that was what the most recent discussion was about. You seem to be agreeing with Y fans who indicate that the U is attempting to marginalize BYU - and offer the reasons that you do.

        Comment

        • Pelado
          Bald not naked
          • Sep 2010
          • 21202

          #2329
          Originally posted by Eddie View Post
          I may be off on my definitions. But declining to play a school because you are in a larger pond and don't want to compete for recruits sounds like it might actually fit into the description of what it means to marginalize.

          And I have it on good - if not great - authority above the Utah does NOT want to marginalize BYU.

          At least I understand that was what the most recent discussion was about. You seem to be agreeing with Y fans who indicate that the U is attempting to marginalize BYU - and offer the reasons that you do.
          I thought the info above was that Utah does want to marginalize BYU, but that it's not because of some PAC-12 directive.
          "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
          - Goatnapper'96

          Comment

          • Eddie
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 8098

            #2330
            Originally posted by Pelado View Post
            I thought the info above was that Utah does want to marginalize BYU, but that it's not because of some PAC-12 directive.
            I admit that a lot has been said that all seems contradictory. But this is what I was referring to:

            Originally posted by Jarid in Cedar View Post
            Your facts are half correct. There is pressure on Utah's athletic department to put the Holy War on hold, but it is not from the PAC-12. It is from higher up in the administration at the University. And I can assure you that my two sources on the topic absolutely trump anything you think you have.
            Originally posted by Jarid in Cedar View Post
            I should also add that the motivation has very little to do with marginalizing BYU. Much of you(or your sources) interpretation of the facts are spun to help BYU play the victim card.
            Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
            JIC speaks the truth.

            Comment

            • Pelado
              Bald not naked
              • Sep 2010
              • 21202

              #2331
              Originally posted by Eddie View Post
              I admit that a lot has been said that all seems contradictory. But this is what I was referring to:
              I guess I glossed over JIC's second post there.
              "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
              - Goatnapper'96

              Comment

              • Jarid in Cedar
                CS Institutional Memory
                • Jun 2009
                • 13234

                #2332
                Originally posted by Pelado View Post
                I guess I glossed over JIC's second post there.
                Being married, i get used to it.
                "The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."

                "They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."

                "I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."

                -Rick Majerus

                Comment

                • Pelado
                  Bald not naked
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 21202

                  #2333
                  Originally posted by Jarid in Cedar View Post
                  Being married, i get used to it.
                  It's similar to when my wife is talking. I usually listen to the first thing she says. The second thing - not so much.
                  "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                  - Goatnapper'96

                  Comment

                  • Jarid in Cedar
                    CS Institutional Memory
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 13234

                    #2334
                    Originally posted by Pelado View Post
                    It's similar to when my wife is talking. I usually listen to the first thing she says. The second thing - not so much.
                    My wife says i hear every 4th word. I am good at hearing without listening. I tell her to make the 4th words the important ones.
                    "The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."

                    "They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."

                    "I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."

                    -Rick Majerus

                    Comment

                    • snowcat
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1348

                      #2335
                      USA Today reporting SDSU back to the MWC.


                      One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.

                      Woot

                      I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
                      SU

                      Comment

                      • New Mexican Disaster
                        Suomalainen
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 4549

                        #2336
                        Originally posted by Eddie View Post
                        I may be off on my definitions. But declining to play a school because you are in a larger pond and don't want to compete for recruits sounds like it might actually fit into the description of what it means to marginalize.

                        And I have it on good - if not great - authority above the Utah does NOT want to marginalize BYU.

                        At least I understand that was what the most recent discussion was about. You seem to be agreeing with Y fans who indicate that the U is attempting to marginalize BYU - and offer the reasons that you do.
                        I am a Cougar fan. I am just saying that there is a pretty clear logic to using whatever advantages you have in order to improve that status of your program. I would not blame the Utes one bit for doing this. I would not like it, but I think it would get Macchiavelli's stamp of approval.

                        Comment

                        • Eddie
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 8098

                          #2337
                          Originally posted by New Mexican Disaster View Post
                          I am a Cougar fan. I am just saying that there is a pretty clear logic to using whatever advantages you have in order to improve that status of your program. I would not blame the Utes one bit for doing this. I would not like it, but I think it would get Macchiavelli's stamp of approval.
                          What you are saying is what makes it weird that Ute fans would say that they aren't interested in marginalizing BYU. I mean, it makes sense to do so. Why not play up your conference and bigger fish to fry than the "team down south"?

                          But JIC says it isn't so. Which brings the question to full circle - if it isn't to marginalize BYU, then why would Utah want to cool off the rivalry and stop playing for an extended period of time?

                          Comment

                          • wuapinmon
                            Soul Plumber
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 30711

                            #2338
                            Georgia Tech left the SEC in the 60's, yet UGA and GaTech, both state schools, still play each other in the last game, every season, without fail.
                            "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                            The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                            Comment

                            • wapiti
                              Junior Member
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 2064

                              #2339
                              Originally posted by Eddie View Post
                              But JIC says it isn't so. Which brings the question to full circle - if it isn't to marginalize BYU, then why would Utah want to cool off the rivalry and stop playing for an extended period of time?
                              The only other reason would be to dumb down the schedule because they don't think they can get to 6 wins without three wins in the non-conference. But there are inconsistencies in that argument with the Fresno series.

                              The BYU game is a 50/50 game (or better). To replace BYU they signed a H/H with Fresno, who is nearly as dangerous but not nearly as lucrative. I'm guessing the Utes will lose over a million dollars by replacing BYU with Fresno. (Lower ticket prices/sales, travel, fan enthusiasm, etc). So they lost out financially but didn't gain much competitively.

                              Comment

                              • Jarid in Cedar
                                CS Institutional Memory
                                • Jun 2009
                                • 13234

                                #2340
                                Originally posted by Eddie View Post
                                What you are saying is what makes it weird that Ute fans would say that they aren't interested in marginalizing BYU. I mean, it makes sense to do so. Why not play up your conference and bigger fish to fry than the "team down south"?

                                But JIC says it isn't so. Which brings the question to full circle - if it isn't to marginalize BYU, then why would Utah want to cool off the rivalry and stop playing for an extended period of time?
                                I think some Utah fans are interested in marginalizing BYU, but that isn't the motivation of the school.
                                "The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."

                                "They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."

                                "I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."

                                -Rick Majerus

                                Comment

                                Working...