Seems like a rational dude.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Big 12 expansion groundswell
Collapse
X
-
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
Vefy HoffificOriginally posted by TripletDaddy View Posta bunch of tweetsDon't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
- Howard Aiken
Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
- Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule
Comment
-
And you know this Greg because you know someone who works at the U. of Minnesota athletic department who therefore would have clear knowledge of what the Big 12 is going to do? Got it. Smart guy because nothing the Big 12 has done in years would seem to lead me to believe even they know what they want to do, but I'll take your word for it.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
Comment
-
As long as Greg Flugaur is not living in sin with or married to owner of said D, the kids are g to g.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Postnot if his kids want to be LDS and live at home!
"Seriously, is there a bigger high on the whole face of the earth than eating a salad?"--SeattleUte
"The only Ute to cause even half the nationwide hysteria of Jimmermania was Ted Bundy."--TripletDaddy
This is a tough, NYC broad, a doctor who deals with bleeding organs, dying people and testicles on a regular basis without crying."--oxcoug
"I'm not impressed (and I'm even into choreography . . .)"--Donuthole
"I too was fortunate to leave with my same balls."--byu71
Comment
-
Wrong! He knows someone at the Big Ten. He calls him BTM (Big Ten Man).Originally posted by BlueK View PostAnd you know this Greg because you know someone who works at the U. of Minnesota athletic department who therefore would have clear knowledge of what the Big 12 is going to do? Got it. Smart guy because nothing the Big 12 has done in years would seem to lead me to believe even they know what they want to do, but I'll take your word for it.
Comment
-
untrue. If, at any point in the past, Greg Flugaur was living in sin with or married to the D owner (s'ing the d goes without saying), the kids are in mortal peril, even if Greg is no longer living with, married to, or s'ing currently.Originally posted by Lost Student View PostAs long as Greg Flugaur is not living in sin with or married to owner of said D, the kids are g to g.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
Ok, I could be wrong, but my understanding was that his source is a U. of Minnesota athletic dept. dude who knows what the Big 10 knows about Big 12 expansion. But even if it is someone who works within the Big 10 it still makes me question how they would know everything that a completely different conference is going to do. It's not like these P5 conferences trust each other. Obviously they don't when they have to write contracts with their own members granting their TV rights for eternity to make it harder for a rival conference to raid them. So yeah, they're going to leak their information about expansion plans to another league? Logic would say they'd be more likely to leak fake information.Originally posted by YOhio View PostWrong! He knows someone at the Big Ten. He calls him BTM (Big Ten Man).
Comment
-
Yeah, I imagine the B12 makes a habit of sharing their inner discussions with other conferences.Originally posted by BlueK View PostOk, I could be wrong, but my understanding was that his source is a U. of Minnesota athletic dept. dude who knows what the Big 10 knows about Big 12 expansion. But even if it is someone who works within the Big 10 it still makes me question how they would know everything that a completely different conference is going to do. It's not like these P5 conferences trust each other. Obviously they don't when they have to write contracts with their own members granting their TV rights for eternity to make it harder for a rival conference to raid them. So yeah, they're going to leak their information about expansion plans to another league? Logic would say they'd be more likely to leak fake information.
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
S'ing a D alone does not preclude baptism of the D S'er's children. Only children of a parent who "has lived or is living in a same-gender relationship" ("whether the couple is married or cohabiting") are affected by the new policy. So I still say that Greg Flugaur's kids can be baptized, even after Greg Flugaur has played the Zampoña of other men.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Postuntrue. If, at any point in the past, Greg Flugaur was living in sin with or married to the D owner (s'ing the d goes without saying), the kids are in mortal peril, even if Greg is no longer living with, married to, or s'ing currently."Seriously, is there a bigger high on the whole face of the earth than eating a salad?"--SeattleUte
"The only Ute to cause even half the nationwide hysteria of Jimmermania was Ted Bundy."--TripletDaddy
This is a tough, NYC broad, a doctor who deals with bleeding organs, dying people and testicles on a regular basis without crying."--oxcoug
"I'm not impressed (and I'm even into choreography . . .)"--Donuthole
"I too was fortunate to leave with my same balls."--byu71
Comment
-
I completely agree. Greg's history of prior d s'ing would have relatively little or no bearing on whether his children today could be baptized, which is why I said that it "goes without saying." I understand now the ambiguity of what I typed. Your prior counsel is still incorrect in that Greg would not currently have to be cohabitating or in a same gender marriage. Yes, Greg could, if he so chose, s as many Ds as he wants (not legally if there were no consent). However, Greg's kids would not be g to g if Greg had, at any time in the past, cohabitated or entered into a same gender marriage. that is all i am saying.Originally posted by Lost Student View PostS'ing a D alone does not preclude baptism of the D S'er's children. Only children of a parent who "has lived or is living in a same-gender relationship" ("whether the couple is married or cohabiting") are affected by the new policy. So I still say that Greg Flugaur's kids can be baptized, even after Greg Flugaur has played the Zampoña of other men.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
guys my name has two d's (much like deenieOriginally posted by TripletDaddy View PostI completely agree. Greg's history of prior d s'ing would have relatively little or no bearing on whether his children today could be baptized, which is why I said that it "goes without saying." I understand now the ambiguity of what I typed. Your prior counsel is still incorrect in that Greg would not currently have to be cohabitating or in a same gender marriage. Yes, Greg could, if he so chose, s as many Ds as he wants (not legally if there were no consent). However, Greg's kids would not be g to g if Greg had, at any time in the past, cohabitated or entered into a same gender marriage. that is all i am saying.
)
Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.
Comment
Comment