Originally posted by Uncle Ted
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Big 12 expansion groundswell
Collapse
X
-
Neinas sez: you can check out anytime you like but you can never leave
http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_...s-on-expansion
CN: ...We're very stable for a lot of reasons, and you can't ignore the fact that every one of the 10 signed a grant of rights, which means that the conference now has their television rights, so that puts us in a very secure position going forward.
DU: That was officially executed, correct?
CN: Oh, yes.
DU: When were the official documents actually signed?
CN: It was done. I can't remember -- I can't give you the date, but of course West Virginia was the last one to sign it over, but they're all in...Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
It doesn't sound like ESPN is fully convinced that the schools have signed.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostNeinas sez: you can check out anytime you like but you can never leave
http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_...s-on-expansionGive 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
-
Anyone know how the Longhorn Network (LHN) operates now that the Big 12 owns each school's TV rights? Something doesn't seem right. On its way out the door, Nebraska asked that each school grant its rights to the conference but Texas said No. Then Texas announced the LHN and ESPN deal. Texas A&M left for the SEC over the LHN/ESPN deal. And now everyone has signed on the dotted line and the LHN still exists and there's no Big 12 network to speak of??? What exactly does the Big 12 own in respect to TV rights? Tier 3 games not aired on the LHN with no conference network to televise them?CN: ...We're very stable for a lot of reasons, and you can't ignore the fact that every one of the 10 signed a grant of rights, which means that the conference now has their television rights, so that puts us in a very secure position going forward.
DU: That was officially executed, correct?
CN: Oh, yes.
DU: When were the official documents actually signed?
CN: It was done. I can't remember -- I can't give you the date, but of course West Virginia was the last one to sign it over, but they're all in...“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
What's the Longhorn Network? I haven't seen that.Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostAnyone know how the Longhorn Network (LHN) operates now that the Big 12 owns each school's TV rights? Something doesn't seem right. On its way out the door, Nebraska asked that each school grant its rights to the conference but Texas said No. Then Texas announced the LHN and ESPN deal. Texas A&M left for the SEC over the LHN/ESPN deal. And now everyone has signed on the dotted line and the LHN still exists and there's no Big 12 network to speak of??? What exactly does the Big 12 own in respect to TV rights? Tier 3 games not aired on the LHN with no conference network to televise them?
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
It's that UT Network that only Verizon Fios has picked up and not their main competitor who has its HQ in the same city as the Big 12 HQ. Still scratching my head on that one.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostWhat's the Longhorn Network? I haven't seen that.
It's all water under the bridge now. But I still wonder what would have occurred if the Big 12 would have acted differently. I don't think it could have prevented Colorado and Nebraska leaving but it should have woke up and at least started talking about a Big 12 network and expanding back to 12 teams. IMO, that would have kept A&M and Missouri in the fold along with adding TCU and BYU.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
It worked...Originally posted by YOhio View Post
But money talks in the end.DSB has also learned from sources with knowledge of the situation, that while BYU continues to flesh out its schedule as an independent, it is also aggressively pursuing full membership in the Big 12 Conference for all of its athletic programs.
BYU has been involved in continued discussions with the Big 12 and its member schools for sometime now, even after the conference added TCU and West Virginia this past fall to replace Texas A&M and Missouri, both of which defected to the SEC.
In fact, discussions between BYU and the Big 12 go back to 2010, when the conference was reduced to ten teams after losing Nebraska and Colorado to the Big Ten and PAC-12 respectively.
Talks between the two parties have ramped up over the past couple of weeks however, with discussions revolving around the possibility of BYU and Louisville being added in time for the 2013-14 athletics season. Such a move would get the conference back to its original number of 12 member schools, and provide it with the opportunity to hold a championship game for football in December of 2013.
For BYU's part, university officials have apparently taken a much more proactive approach during the most recent round of discussions. BYU is reportedly indicating a willingness to bring all of its programs into the league this time around, something that the school had apparently hedged on in past discussions.
Multiple media sources covering the Big 12 reported during last football season that BYU had been "difficult" to negotiate with and that key members of the school's leadership were digging in their heels on certain issues.
Rumors circulated that some members of the BYU Board of Trustees were sensitive to just up and bolting on the faith-based group of schools in the WCC, which had provided a home for most of BYU's programs when the Cougars departed the Mountain West Conference to become an independent in football.
It's unlikely that we will see any official announcement regarding expansion of the Big 12 until the conference decides on a new commissioner. League presidents fired former commissioner Dan Bebee in September of last year and replaced him with Chuck Neinas on an interim basis."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Maybe if ND's Swarbrick is named the Big12 commissioner, BYU's much ballyhooed "friendship" with ND will finally pay dividends.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
Comment
-
It makes some sense. The ink on the WCC deal was still wet and BYU announces a departure. I can see BYU deciding to stay put for at least a season or two in order to not look entirely opportunistic. I'm not saying I agree, but I can see it playing it out that way.Originally posted by Jacob View PostI'm still calling BS on BYU's alleged refusal to bring all sports to the B12 (unless it was due to Sunday play).Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
Tramel sez: SMU, no; BYU, yes!
http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2...t-a-candidate/
West Virginia makes financial sense for the Big 12. Missouri and Texas A&M make financial sense for the SEC. Nebraska made financial sense for the Big Ten. Syracuse and Pittsburgh make financial sense for the ACC.
TCU probably is a financial stretch for the Big 12, but the Big 12 needed a solid replacement for A&M. Colorado and Utah probably were financial stretches for the Pac-12, but the Pac-12 needed two new schools to play a conference championship game.
Brigham Young would make financial sense for the Big 12. Louisville, Cincinnati, Rutgers, Houston, all would be questionable financially but range from probably would pay off (Louisville, Rutgers) to probably wouldn’t (Cincinnati, Houston). Of course, those other criteria come into play, too, which changes the viability in certain ways.
But New Mexico? Southern Miss? SMU? They don’t work. They don’t work at all.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
TCU=big mistake.
Biggest mistake made in this game yet. Probably screws the Big 12 outta the Colorado market for good. We haven't even started playing TCU, and I'm bored w/ them. WVU and their flaming couches is fascinating. BYU and their thousands of wives is fascinating. TCU is like Baylor, and we've long tired of that act. At least the Baptists get worked up about the Mormons. The Horned Frogs can't even spare that little bit of effortOriginally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Beat Mizzou
Comment
Comment