Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski
View Post
Prove me wrong, responsible media.
-
I'm leaning towards crazy with the intent of really trying to bomb people. I'm not a bomb expert like UT, but I still can't get over the fact that some (all?) were packed with glass. I just find it unlikely that he would do all the 'internal' details if he was just doing a hoax.
Prove me wrong, responsible media."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte -
So what details of a fake bomb are rational, and what details are irrational if your intent is to intimidate and spread terror, if that's how you choose to classify this?Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostComment
-
There is nothing suspicious at all about Jeb's van... How did they ever find it?Originally posted by SCcoug View Post
That flag above "Native Americans for Trump" looks like it is from the Miccosukee tribe. They run the best high stakes bingo in Florida!"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
So the story in some circles (given some credence by our own president), is that these bombs were completely fake. It was a hoax perpetrated by some left-wing person, in order to gin up anger right before the midterms. I find it hard to believe that if these are just fake bombs meant to affect the outcome of the election, that the perpetrator would go through that much internal detail. That's certainly not 'rational' in a peaceful society, but it doesn't take a crazy person to do that. Just someone who is an extreme partisan.Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUteComment
-
No, it’s still a big deal. Reason for panic? No. Big deal? Yes.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostComment
-
I am glad the nut is not from Logan.One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.
Woot
I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
SUComment
-
I think what you're saying is that if your goal is perpetrate a hoax, it is only rational for it to resemble a bomb visually, and that since there were also some internal details that also resembled a bomb, it likely wasn't intended to be a hoax.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
Of course we both agree that neither a hoax or failed attempt to bomb is a rational act for a member of our community.Comment
-
Sure, if there is such a thing as rational thinking that goes into making a fake bombOriginally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUteComment
-
I've made lots of fake bombs in my time. Do you think I was acting rationally or irrationally?Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostSure, if there is such a thing as rational thinking that goes into making a fake bombComment
-
Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
Well, at least it isn't the Russians!"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
I want to go on record as shocked this guy is from Florida. SHOCKED!Comment
-
Depends. Can I see a photo of your van before I make my decision?Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUteComment
-
-
Definitely rational!Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUteComment
Comment