SCOTUS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Copelius
    Maker of eyeballs
    • Dec 2012
    • 4047

    #1171
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Didn’t the Supreme Court justices seem quite skeptical of the administration’s argument on birthright citizenship when they had the hearing?
    I cannot remember any of the justices making a positive comment about the government's case. Does not bode well.
    “Every player dreams of being a Yankee, and if they don’t it’s because they never got the chance.” Aroldis Chapman

    Comment

    • Pelado
      Bald not naked
      • Sep 2010
      • 21119

      #1172
      From the ending of Gorsuch's concurring opinion in Slaughter:

      The Court today takes a notable step back toward the Constitution. By recognizing that the President is entitled to remove a principal officer who exercises executive power in his name, the Court does much to vindicate what Franklin D. Roosevelt and James Madison both understood: Under our Constitution, executive power does not belong to a “headless ‘fourth branch,’” Roosevelt Committee 36, but must be exercised through a “chain of dependence” running from “the lowest officers” to “the President,” and from him to the American people, 1 Annals of Cong. 499 (J. Madison).

      At the same time, it would be a grave mistake to think that step is enough on its own. The fact remains that Congress has endowed formerly independent agencies not just with executive authority, but with enormous legislative and judicial powers as well. And now the President enjoys control over all those powers too. From here, the only sure path is to finish the journey we start today and restore legislative and judicial powers to where they belong: in Congress and the courts. We have tolerated adventurous theories long enough. It is time to return, all the way, to the Constitution.
      "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
      - Goatnapper'96

      Comment

      • falafel
        loves to talk on things
        • Mar 2009
        • 37928

        #1173
        Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
        Didn’t the Supreme Court justices seem quite skeptical of the administration’s argument on birthright citizenship when they had the hearing?
        Yes. I don't expect a win for Trump on this one.
        Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

        Dig your own grave, and save!

        "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

        "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

        GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

        Comment

        • Maximus
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 6012

          #1174
          lmao thomas and alito agree with trump on birthright

          of course

          Comment

          • dabrockster
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 10917

            #1175
            Glad to see the Birthright fall and SCOTUS make the right decision.

            Comment

            • dabrockster
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 10917

              #1176
              6-3 decision on Trans Athletes in women’s sports. Another victory in commons sense..

              Comment

              • Northwestcoug
                Cocked and Loaded
                • May 2011
                • 17968

                #1177
                Oh, yay. Another fight for a SCOTUS judge. The constitution hangs by a thread and it’ll be the most important nomination in a generation. Again.
                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                - SeattleUte

                Comment

                • LVAllen
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2013
                  • 3252

                  #1178
                  Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                  Oh, yay. Another fight for a SCOTUS judge. The constitution hangs by a thread and it’ll be the most important nomination in a generation. Again.
                  Alito says "PSYCH!"

                  Comment

                  • Moliere
                    One man.....one pie
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 27840

                    #1179
                    Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                    lmao thomas and alito agree with trump on birthright

                    of course
                    It's amazing that the justices Trump nominated continue to apply decent constitutional principles to their arguments.
                    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                    Comment

                    • Donuthole
                      Official Outgayer
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 25241

                      #1180
                      Originally posted by Moliere View Post

                      It's amazing that the justices Trump nominated continue to apply decent constitutional principles to their arguments.
                      That is almost as amazing as the fact that Alito and Thomas continue to attempt to apply constitutional principles to their arguments.
                      Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                      There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                      Comment

                      • Jeff Lebowski
                        Corporate lackey for Jesus
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 69586

                        #1181
                        I agree with both of these decisions. And I am sure the majority of Americans will too.
                        "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                        "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                        "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                        Comment

                        • All-American
                          Right, as Usual
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 15653

                          #1182
                          Gorsuch dissenting surprises me. I expected Justices Alito and Thomas, and maybe Kavanaugh. That much doesn’t surprise me. But this was never as clear cut as a lot of people thought, and if you can’t convince Justices Gorsuch, that should give you pause.
                          τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                          Comment

                          • USUC
                            Chronic Poseur
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 8780

                            #1183
                            Originally posted by All-American View Post
                            Gorsuch dissenting surprises me. I expected Justices Alito and Thomas, and maybe Kavanaugh. That much doesn’t surprise me. But this was never as clear cut as a lot of people thought, and if you can’t convince Justices Gorsuch, that should give you pause.
                            It appears that Gorsuch is ok with illegal immigrants kids being citizens, but is against birth tourism.

                            Comment

                            • Maximus
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 6012

                              #1184
                              Originally posted by Moliere View Post

                              It's amazing that the justices Trump nominated continue to apply decent constitutional principles to their arguments.
                              lol

                              fake elector principles?

                              Comment

                              • Bo Diddley
                                Senior
                                • Jul 2012
                                • 18764

                                #1185
                                Originally posted by Donuthole View Post

                                That is almost as amazing as the fact that Alito and Thomas continue to attempt to apply constitutional principles to their arguments.

                                Comment

                                Working...