Originally posted by YOhio
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck
Collapse
X
-
No. No. Not "blah, blah, blah, blah." YO is correct. They are both POSes. I can't vote for either of them and am open to a compelling alternative. I don't think we are alone in this thinking. If no one comes forward, I'm writing in Mitt.Originally posted by New Mexican Disaster View PostBlah, blah, blah.Give 'em Hell, Cougars!!!
For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still.
Not long ago an obituary appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune that said the recently departed had "died doing what he enjoyed most—watching BYU lose."
Comment
-
Blah, blah, blah.Originally posted by myboynoah View PostNo. No. Not "blah, blah, blah, blah." YO is correct. They are both POSes. I can't vote for either of them and am open to a compelling alternative. I don't think we are alone in this thinking. If no one comes forward, I'm writing in Mitt.
I'm pretty articulate.
Comment
-
Fat chance. What winning party in US history ever thought the result of the election meant anything other than a sweeping mandate? Never.Originally posted by Eddie View PostI'd love for the republicans to know that if they could've found someone with even half a brain, the election was theirs to lose. And I'd like the Democrats to know that no one was really voting FOR Hillary.
Comment
-
write in is the same as not voting. Maybe most voters don't realize that states throw those write in votes straight into the trash without even adding them up. The only exception is if the person you are writing in is actually a registered candidate. The other case is if say, a real third party candidate doesn't have enough petition signatures to get their name printed on the ballot in that state. You can write in that person's name and at least the state counts it. But writing in someone who hasn't declared as a candidate is the same as not voting. But maybe it will make you feel better. At least voting for a real 3rd party candidate actually helps that party perhaps meet a legal threshold to get onto the ballot next time or to qualify for matching funds or something.Originally posted by BigFatMeanie View PostIf Trump wins the Republican nomination, regardless of whether he wins the presidency, I will officially change my party affiliation to Independent. I can't in good conscience affiliate with a party that would nominate Donald Trump as its candidate.
If Trump and Hillary are the nominees from the major parties I will either vote third party (maybe Libertarian? I haven't decided yet) or write-in Mitt Romney.
If either Trump or Hillary win the election I won't move out of the country but will instead try to endure their horrible presidencies as best I can.
Comment
-
I have come to terms with the mathematical and statistical reality that my one vote isn't going to be what throws the election one way or the other. It's not a fact most human beings really want to admit because while it is logically correct it just feels wrong emotionally to most people. What I have found when I've voted Libertarian is that I actually feel more at peace with my decision than I ever have voting for the lesser of two evils. Just get over the fact that your vote out of millions doesn't make the difference in who wins anyway and go with a candidate you like instead of who you hate less.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostLet me be clear, much of the libertarian platform resonates with me. When Gillespie and Harsanyi write political pieces, I don't find much to argue with. But the national Libertarian organization as a viable political party? Um, no. Not yet anyways.
Comment
-
That's true. And to some extent I hope for that. A solid, level headed traditional republican running independently would carry Utah probably because Utahns hate both Trump and Hillary. They would probably have to take a few other states to keep someone from getting to 270, and then hope the house of reps votes for them. But that's still a huge longshot.Originally posted by Maximus View Postif the right independent ran, there is a slight possibility of getting enough votes to prevent anyone from getting 270
On the other hand, I think it's also very likely an indy campaign could very well actually end up helping Trump win more than Hillary.Last edited by BlueK; 04-28-2016, 07:09 AM.
Comment
-
The only positive I can think of coming from a Hillary vs Trump race is that I could go to the voting booth here in Utah and think my Presidential vote actually might matter.
As far as registering independent, I will do some research but I think Trump does best in the states where Independents are allowed to vote in the Republican primary.
After this is all over I wish Ryan would form a coalition and tell Hannity, Limbaugh and their ilk to take their followers and go form their own "conservative" party.
Comment
-
The ones who will really have to backpedal are those who claimed they would vote for Hillary over Donald. Backpedaling is second nature to a politician. I heard Carly F. this morning explaining why she didn't really mean the negative things she had said about Ted Cruz.Originally posted by Shaka View PostIt's going to be fun watching all the Republicans who were up in arms about the Trump candidacy backpedal like PAC trying to summit Donner's.
Comment
-
I thought almost all of those "conservative" talk show hosts are all in on Trump? They're not conservative. they're just populist rabble rousers like Trump is.Originally posted by byu71 View PostT
Hannity, Limbaugh and their ilk to take their followers and go form their own "conservative" party.
Comment
-
Trump or Cruz. Who knows what conservative is anymore anyway? A lot of folks who I consider conservative are flexible on immigration and I am with them. However, according to the media conservatives you can't have that position and be conservative.Originally posted by BlueK View PostI thought almost all of those "conservative" talk show hosts are all in on Trump? They're not conservative. they're just populist rabble rousers like Trump is.
I don't know exactly how I would define myself anymore except I cringe at the thought of someone thinking I was a liberal.
That is not to indicate I don't think there are a lot of great people who define themselves as liberal, I just am not a fan of lala land.Last edited by byu71; 04-28-2016, 08:02 AM.
Comment
-
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
Comment