Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck
Collapse
X
-
"Clearly intentional and willful mishandling..." Aren't there emails that document Hillary specifically instructing subordinates to remove Classified labels on emails in order to send them through unapproved channels? I don't know how you can get more clearly intentional or willful than that."It's devastating, because we lost to a team that's not even in the Pac-12. To lose to Utah State is horrible." - John White IV
-
I expect a bit more of this to come out.
http://ijr.com//2016/07/643260-5-mil...llary-clinton/
Not that it matters much in terms of electoral damage. It clearly doesn't and especially not with the GOP putting up dipshit DJT to emphasize the importance of process, discretion, and classification distinctions. At this point it seems like the biggest damage potential is to morale within the intelligence community. The potential for resentment and disfunction is likely pretty high.
Comment
-
So we (the taxpayers) spent over $20mm (most likely much more) investigating this and all we got is this indefinite statement? Of course, I for one, wasn't expecting the dumbass FBI to come up with even this much so I am guess I am happy.Originally posted by All-American View Post"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. . . .
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences."
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
I'd say that about sums it up.Last edited by Uncle Ted; 07-05-2016, 01:40 PM."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Well, at least one FB friend knows why the FBI won't recommend Hillary's indictment:
At this point, Federal Prosecutors will have to decide if they want to be added to the Clinton Body Count or not.
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
It seems that Clinton has some of the worst judgment out of any high profile politician. She voted for the Iraq war. She got destroyed during hillarycare. She was anti-gay marriage up until Obama changed his position a couple years ago. She sucked as sec of state. She has no signature piece of legislation as a senator.
Makes me want to write in Biden's name just out of spite.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
And the GOP is dumb enough to put up Trump. The political process isn't working, but thank goodness for American enterprise and technology. Our lives operate largely separate and in spite of politics and government, but if we keep electing persons such as Hillary, it may not be so. I am not a prognosticator of the body politic, but the current generation seems to have lost the lessons of the sixties and seventies.Originally posted by Moliere View PostIt seems that Clinton has some of the worst judgment out of any high profile politician. She voted for the Iraq war. She got destroyed during hillarycare. She was anti-gay marriage up until Obama changed his position a couple years ago. She sucked as sec of state. She has no signature piece of legislation as a senator.
Makes me want to write in Biden's name just out of spite.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk"Guitar groups are on their way out, Mr Epstein."
Upon rejecting the Beatles, Dick Rowe told Brian Epstein of the January 1, 1962 audition for Decca, which signed Brian Poole and the Tremeloes instead.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostWell, at least one FB friend knows why the FBI won't recommend Hillary's indictment:
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Let's be fair, nearly every congress person voted for the Iraq war. The anti-gay marriage stance was also very typical.Originally posted by Moliere View PostIt seems that Clinton has some of the worst judgment out of any high profile politician. She voted for the Iraq war. She got destroyed during hillarycare. She was anti-gay marriage up until Obama changed his position a couple years ago. She sucked as sec of state. She has no signature piece of legislation as a senator.
Makes me want to write in Biden's name just out of spite.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
I agree, but by that logic it should be a non-issue for all politicians, and Dems shouldn't be beating the GOP up over supporting either. Also, by that logic, Mozilla had no business firing their CEO for supporting Prop 8, but that's a discussion whose day has passed.Originally posted by frank ryan View PostLet's be fair, nearly every congress person voted for the Iraq war. The anti-gay marriage stance was also very typical.sigpic
"Outlined against a blue, gray
October sky the Four Horsemen rode again"
Grantland Rice, 1924
Comment
-
That's funnyOriginally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
This is the part of the quote that has meaning for me:Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostI am sure that is how Fox News will spin it.
No, others may not be prosecuted either, but there's a good chance they'd lose their jobs....those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.
Edit: And lose their security clearance. Here's a question: how can you be a president without a security clearance? There's no constitutional requirement, but how would that work in practice?
Comment
-
I thought this 'fact check' of the FBI investigation by AP was pretty good.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6ee62...nder-fbi-probe
They concluded that she was dishonest with her prior statements and very careless with potentially sensitive info. I guess that is a pretty damning indictment for a secretary of state. I'm not sure how that affects my voting plans yet. For now, I'm tepidly and cautiously still pro-Hillary."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Funny how this is being touted as a smoking gun in the regular media and social media. Like the FBI is that stupid.Originally posted by Bo Diddley View PostThis is the part of the quote that has meaning for me:
No, others may not be prosecuted either, but there's a good chance they'd lose their jobs.
Edit: And lose their security clearance. Here's a question: how can you be a president without a security clearance? There's no constitutional requirement, but how would that work in practice?
I read this statement as essentially saying, "We aren't saying that one can always do these things with no consequence or no fear of prosecution, but in this case there are not enough factors to prosecute.""There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Comey said her server had Special Access Program level information. You can remove potentially from your statement.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostI thought this 'fact check' of the FBI investigation by AP was pretty good.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6ee62...nder-fbi-probe
They concluded that she was dishonest with her prior statements and very careless with potentially sensitive info. I guess that is a pretty damning indictment for a secretary of state. I'm not sure how that affects my voting plans yet. For now, I'm tepidly and cautiously still pro-Hillary.
Comment
Comment