The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck

[old_gregg]

on the bright side, whether a person supports or votes for trump has become a great litmus test for if they're a dumbass or not. easy to interpret the results and perfectly accurate.

[BlueK]

on the bright side, whether a person supports or votes for trump has become a great litmus test for if they're a dumbass or not. easy to interpret the results and perfectly accurate.

LOL. Excellent insight

[BlueK]

I think the pundits are finally right this time. Trump is in trouble. The other times they said so the poll numbers didn't agree. Now they do. At this point in the election the only folks left to persuade are the ones who haven't already jumped onto the Trump bandwagon. They're unlikely to now as long as Trump continues to show a complete lack of ability to stop himself from saying stupid things.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...for_trump.html

[Commando]

I can't wait for Trump to lose so I can go on social media and shit on all the people who agreed with him when he called Romney a loser for losing narrowly to Obama. Ha!

[falafel]

I think the pundits are finally right this time. Trump is in trouble. The other times they said so the poll numbers didn't agree. Now they do. At this point in the election the only folks left to persuade are the ones who haven't already jumped onto the Trump bandwagon. They're unlikely to now as long as Trump continues to show a complete lack of ability to stop himself from saying stupid things.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...for_trump.html

At this point it's going to take something much bigger than a speech read off a teleprompter for Trump to break through. He's got everything against him. He's got the big Mo against him... A new candidate in the race. A guy that could cause him serious, grievous problems in Utah, and turn that state over.

Um, Joe, you probably didn't know this... but a Mormon can call another Mormon a Mo, but when other people do it....

[BlueK]

Um, Joe, you probably didn't know this... but a Mormon can call another Mormon a Mo, but when other people do it....

LOL. pretty sure he meant "momentum," which is definitely going the wrong way for Trump at the moment. The 3rd party guy will probably mostly just take from the 16-20% Johnson is polling in Utah. But yes, Trump taking Utah is not a sure thing just yet.

[Maximus]

on the bright side, whether a person supports or votes for trump has become a great litmus test for if they're a dumbass or not. easy to interpret the results and perfectly accurate.

I have a new roommate, who I found out was a trumper his first night in the apartment. Since then, I have gotten multiple lectures on the syrians raping all over the place and how we cant allow them here.

[Donuthole]

LOL. pretty sure he meant "momentum," which is definitely going the wrong way for Trump at the moment.

[beefytee]

So now Trump's implying that there should be an assassination/coup if Hillary wins.

[Commando]

Trump campaign's swift

Embedded Tweet

[Commando]

Patton Oswalt's feed is cracking me up...

Embedded Tweet

[falafel]

If Donald Trump weren't running for President, he'd probably be on the US men's Olympic volleyball team. He is a very good volleyball player, that I can tell you.

Embedded Tweet

[Donuthole]

Back when Brother Trump used to wear his garments. He stopped, and the wheels came off. Coincidence?

[Omaha 680]

Back when Brother Trump used to wear his garments. He stopped, and the wheels came off. Coincidence?

Is that a garment top or a bro?

[Uncle Ted]

Snitches get stitches?... Or, in this case, two bullets in the back of the head.

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Discusses Seth Rich, Sources & the DNC

WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange gave an interview to Dutch television in which he discussed the Seth Rich murder case in Washington D.C. and would not confirm or deny whether Rich was a WikiLeaks’ source.


However, WikiLeaks, as a matter of practice, does not confirm or deny its sources. The comments made by Assange – coming shortly before WikiLeaks announced a $20,000 reward in the Rich case – are drawing new attention to the homicide of the young DNC analyst.

Rich, a data analyst with the Democratic National Committee, was gunned down in an unsolved murder case in early July. Conspiracy theorists have claimed – without any evidence to back it up – that Rich might have been the source of DNC emails published by WikiLeaks; U.S. officials and some data experts have said Russian intelligence might be behind the hack. A hacktivist named “Guccifer 2.0” has also claimed responsibility for the DNC hack.


Some are interpreting the interview Assange gave with NOS, a major public broadcast company in the Netherlands, as admitting that Rich was a WikiLeaks’ source. However, what Assange actually said is more nuanced and open to interpretation. Shortly after the interview, WikiLeaks announced that it was offering a $20,000 for information leading to a conviction in the Rich case.

[...]

http://heavy.com/news/2016/08/seth-r...n-shawn-lucas/