Originally posted by Bo Diddley
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Energy Thread
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, that is the whole issue. Figuring out fusion is not as cheap as putting a lump of coal on the fire. That's why we haven't done it yet.
-
-
Wow, talk about a gigantic buzzkill.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
The professor guy near the end of this 60 Minutes report said that Joe Biden's goal of achieving commercial nuclear fusion within ten years is pure BS... we most likely won't see commercial fusion power until like 2050. And to get those 3 megajoules out it actually took like 300 megajoules in (not 2 megajoules). They still need to work on that efficiency problem.
Commercial fusion power is possible but it is going to take a heck of a lot more engineering. We can't live on solar and wind power until then.
Leave a comment:
-
It will probably be a political fight over spending money on it early on. I'm guessing that when you factor in all the costs, fusion will be more expensive at first.Originally posted by All-American View Post
Sure, but might as well shoot for it. If, by shooting for it, you are actually committing resources to try to achieve it.
My worry is that fusion is going to become somebody's political objective and the whole thing gets polarized. Oh, democrats like fusion, therefore we republicans hate it. Or vice versa.
Leave a comment:
-
Sure, but might as well shoot for it. If, by shooting for it, you are actually committing resources to try to achieve it.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
The professor guy near the end of this 60 Minutes report said that Joe Biden's goal of achieving commercial nuclear fusion within ten years is pure BS... we most likely won't see commercial fusion power until like 2050. And to get those 3 megajoules out it actually took like 300 megajoules in (not 2 megajoules). They still need to work on that efficiency problem.
Commercial fusion power is possible but it is going to take a heck of a lot more engineering. We can't live on solar and wind power until then.
My worry is that fusion is going to become somebody's political objective and the whole thing gets polarized. Oh, democrats like fusion, therefore we republicans hate it. Or vice versa.
Leave a comment:
-
The professor guy near the end of this 60 Minutes report said that Joe Biden's goal of achieving commercial nuclear fusion within ten years is pure BS... we most likely won't see commercial fusion power until like 2050. And to get those 3 megajoules out it actually took like 300 megajoules in (not 2 megajoules). They still need to work on that efficiency problem.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Commercial fusion power is possible but it is going to take a heck of a lot more engineering. We can't live on solar and wind power until then.
Leave a comment:
-
Good details in this article: https://arstechnica.com/science/2022...ced-this-week/
The power aimed at the hydrogen was 2 megajoules and they got 3 megajoules back out, but overall power to get the lasers to fire was 300 megajoules, and they can't repeat it without a long wait in between. The lasers were designed 30 years ago, so not quite the latest technology. The article makes it more clear about where we're at currently and other directions the research needs to consider.
Leave a comment:
-
I know lots of people that were convinced they were going to see the second coming before their death…. Most of them are dead now. I wonder if I am going to see a nuclear fusion power plant before my death. I think I have a better chance of seeing the second coming.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Leave a comment:
-
And there it is...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...-breakthrough/It is still at least a decade — maybe decades — away from commercial use, but the latest development is likely to be touted by the Biden administration as an affirmation of a massive investment by the government over the years.
Leave a comment:
-
US scientists achieve q>1 from fusion reaction, meaning, more energy output than input.
This is a little misleading, because it counts energy put into the system but not energy needed to run the experiment. Still, an important milestone.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2243247.html
Leave a comment:
-
I got back from South Africa this week. I stayed in Cape Town for a couple of days and then drove up the coast eventually ending up in Port Elizabeth. Every city and every hotel I visited was affected by load shedding for at least two hours a day. It was annoying. Some places, including the two Marriott properties, had battery backup or generator systems in place. Even then the power would go out for thirty seconds or so until the secondary power switched on. That meant the TV and internet had to reboot which oftentimes to five or more minutes.
Leave a comment:
-
Southern Africa is experience daily power outages for hours at a time. This article explains a little bit of the reason.
https://www.energypolicy.columbia.ed...can-hydropower
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe the above picture explains the following... and the generator shortage.Originally posted by wuapinmon View PostModern Life,
Walks on by me
Modern Life
Openly mocks me,
Modern Life,
Won't get me to the church on time,
Church on time
Chargin' my Tesla
Church on time
Should've taken my Cessna
Church on time
Guts my faith in Twitter Man
Twitter Man
Cares more about rockets
Twitter Man
Too much dough in his pockets
Twitter Man
Don't believe in modern life
5458559252173013761_120.jpg
https://www.wired.com/story/american...-0-54-in-2021/Electric Vehicles Cut US Gas Consumption by a Measly 0.54%
A new report shows that national gasoline usage barely changed in 2021, despite increasing EV adoption.
ELECTRIC VEHICLES HAVE never been more popular. Just about every automaker is in the midst of an electrification effort, spurred on by impending government regulations around the world aimed at reducing our dependency on fossil fuels. But is the movement having an effect? Here in the US, plug-in vehicles are selling better than ever, despite supply chain shortages and frequent hefty dealership markups.
[...]
This report is not an argument against people buying EVs, of course; any gas savings is an improvement on turning that gasoline into atmospheric pollution that worsens climate change. But it should be clear now that EVs on their own are not a panacea to our transport-related climate problems, and the future will require many more people to walk, cycle, or take the bus to get to where they're going.
But by the time the price of gasoline hits $99.9/gallon next year I bet gas consumption will be down by 5%. Joe should raise the gas taxes and make it happen sooner.
Leave a comment:
-
Modern Life,
Walks on by me
Modern Life
Openly mocks me,
Modern Life,
Won't get me to the church on time,
Church on time
Chargin' my Tesla
Church on time
Should've taken my Cessna
Church on time
Guts my faith in Twitter Man
Twitter Man
Cares more about rockets
Twitter Man
Too much dough in his pockets
Twitter Man
Don't believe in modern life
5458559252173013761_120.jpg
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: