I love Utah politics
Collapse
X
-
Lee will win. It won't be close. 60% or more of the vote.Originally posted by beefytee View PostAs I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
-
-
I don't want to make that bet because I'd want to lose the bet. Last election he got 68% of the vote.Originally posted by BigFatMeanie View Post
I agree with you that Lee will win, but your claim of 60% or more is ludicrous.
I'll bet you a large Via313 pizza (The Bobo) that Lee wins with less than 60% of the vote.As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
Against a D. This time it’s against an I.Originally posted by MartyFunkhouser View Post
I don't want to make that bet because I'd want to lose the bet. Last election he got 68% of the vote.
I think Lee could be in trouble. I think it’s unlikely he loses, but within the realm of possibility.
i just wish his supporter for a coup would have cost him more votes.
Comment
-
He was doing what a lot of his base wanted him to do. I think it will be seen as a positive, not a negative. It should be seen as a negative.Originally posted by Applejack View Post
Against a D. This time it’s against an I.
I think Lee could be in trouble. I think it’s unlikely he loses, but within the realm of possibility.
i just wish his supporter for a coup would have cost him more votes.As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
McMullin should be pounding Lee's record as well. He has only passed like 6 bills in his 12 years in the Senate, and a few of those were to name buildings. He has voted No on some very popular bills, his obstructionism should be vilified. And Lee's promise to only serve two terms is something else to emphasize.Originally posted by MartyFunkhouser View Post
He was doing what a lot of his base wanted him to do. I think it will be seen as a positive, not a negative. It should be seen as a negative.
Comment
-
McMullin has been way too soft going after Lee. Disappointing.Originally posted by chrisrenrut View Post
McMullin should be pounding Lee's record as well. He has only passed like 6 bills in his 12 years in the Senate, and a few of those were to name buildings. He has voted No on some very popular bills, his obstructionism should be vilified. And Lee's promise to only serve two terms is something else to emphasize."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
-
Yeah. Let's send him more money so that he can buy more ads touting his CIA career and bragging that he won't ever take money from special interest groups.Originally posted by Clark Addison View Post
He makes up for it by being very aggressive going after my donations.
Good grief, who is advising this campaign?"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
The Utah legislature and Senate effing around with the Rules of Civil Procedure because they are pissed about the preliminary injunction with the abortion case is really effed up. It is going to cause massive problems. It is the wrong way to do things.
Also, the temper tantrum in general about the injunction will hand long reaching negative effects on Utah. What a joke. Our politicians in this state are short sighted and deplorable.As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
Utah County Attorney's office has a really interesting interpretation of the brandishing statute. https://www.ksl.com/article/50711472...er-shot-by-fbi
Because it is a misdemeanor though, it would not have taken aways his guns except for the one he brandished at the time. Not saying that it would have prevented him being taken out by the FBI, but it seems to go back to the addage that we don't need new gun laws, just enforcement of current ones. The on call attorney should have had him hooked up to cool his heals even if they determined to decline charges later on.“Every player dreams of being a Yankee, and if they don’t it’s because they never got the chance.” Aroldis Chapman
Comment
-
The officer consulted an on-call prosecutor in the Utah County Attorney's Office and determined no crime had occurred, writing in the report that "Robertson had been exercising his 2nd amendment rights, albeit a little recklessly."Originally posted by Copelius View PostUtah County Attorney's office has a really interesting interpretation of the brandishing statute. https://www.ksl.com/article/50711472...er-shot-by-fbi
Because it is a misdemeanor though, it would not have taken aways his guns except for the one he brandished at the time. Not saying that it would have prevented him being taken out by the FBI, but it seems to go back to the addage that we don't need new gun laws, just enforcement of current ones. The on call attorney should have had him hooked up to cool his heals even if they determined to decline charges later on.
So the second amendment gives the right to use guns recklessly?
. What. The. Hell.
Comment
Comment