Originally posted by falafel
View Post
Official 2026 Midterm Election Thread (If Trump lets us have one! TIC!)
Collapse
X
-
-
We'll see what happens when the League of Women Voters of Mass. gets before SCOTUS. For now, section 3 (the part dealing with the Post Office) is still enjoined.Originally posted by falafel View PostSCOTUS just approved Trump's dumbass executive order on mail-in ballots, confirming that we have officially handed all power to Nero, a dumb, narcissistic inbred asshole hell-bent on sucking the country dry.
Comment
-
Remember all the heat I caught when I dared to speculate that Trump is long to f$&k with midterms? This kind of shit is what I was talking aboutOriginally posted by falafel View PostSCOTUS just approved Trump's dumbass executive order on mail-in ballots, confirming that we have officially handed all power to Nero, a dumb, narcissistic inbred asshole hell-bent on sucking the country dry.
Comment
-
No, I don't remember any heat. Unless it was DB and his FDS.Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
Remember all the heat I caught when I dared to speculate that Trump is long to f$&k with midterms? This kind of shit is what I was talking about"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
I think most of us realize Trump would really like to cheat however he can. How much he can succeed in affecting the results is probably minimal, IMO. I don't think the redistricting is going to help all that much because he has lost a lot of support even among his base and there is a pretty decent amount of discontent in rural areas. Republican reps even in deep red districts won't do town halls anymore because of it. And if he tries having ICE show up at voting places I think it will piss most people off and backfire big time. But I do tend to be optimistic.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
No, I don't remember any heat. Unless it was DB and his FDS.
Comment
-
A frustrating pattern I see with SCOTUS in these Trump overreach cases is that they know full well that ultimately they won't hold up Constitutionally but they overrule the blocks of lower courts, very often put in by conservative judges to temporarily allow Trump to overstep his authority for months until it finally gets defeated on merit. I get that they will make a procedural argument for that. What is annoying is that they didn't usually do that under the last dem president and probably won't under the next.Originally posted by LVAllen View Post
We'll see what happens when the League of Women Voters of Mass. gets before SCOTUS. For now, section 3 (the part dealing with the Post Office) is still enjoined.
My preference would be for the courts to knock down unconstitutional executive overreach every time, regardless of what party the president is. The executive branch is way too powerful, far beyond what the founders would have wanted. I mean, they risked everything and fought a war to not have kings.
👍 1Comment
-
SCOTUS deserves all the scrutiny they are getting.Originally posted by BlueK View Post
A frustrating pattern I see with SCOTUS in these Trump overreach cases is that they know full well that ultimately they won't hold up Constitutionally but they overrule the blocks of lower courts, very often put in by conservative judges to temporarily allow Trump to overstep his authority for months until it finally gets defeated on merit. I get that they will make a procedural argument for that. What is annoying is that they didn't usually do that under the last dem president and probably won't under the next.
My preference would be for the courts to knock down unconstitutional executive overreach every time, regardless of what party the president is. The executive branch is way too powerful, far beyond what the founders would have wanted. I mean, they risked everything and fought a war to not have kings.
Comment
-
Republicans were already struggling to defuse simmering voter frustrations over the cost of living ahead of the midterms. Then President Donald Trump rekindled his trade wars.
Trump's latest actions — especially his decision to impose 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods, inviting retaliatory duties from America's No. 2 trading partner — has sparked new pushback from GOP lawmakers and candidates.
His moves are set to reverberate especially hard in a handful of states crucial to the party's hopes of keeping their Senate majority. That includes northern border states, such as Maine and Michigan, as well as agriculture-heavy battlegrounds like Iowa and North Carolina that have been buffeted for more than a year by Trump's embrace of hardball trade tactics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlueK View Post
Republicans were already struggling to defuse simmering voter frustrations over the cost of living ahead of the midterms. Then President Donald Trump rekindled his trade wars.
Trump's latest actions — especially his decision to impose 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion worth of Canadian goods, inviting retaliatory duties from America's No. 2 trading partner — has sparked new pushback from GOP lawmakers and candidates.
His moves are set to reverberate especially hard in a handful of states crucial to the party's hopes of keeping their Senate majority. That includes northern border states, such as Maine and Michigan, as well as agriculture-heavy battlegrounds like Iowa and North Carolina that have been buffeted for more than a year by Trump's embrace of hardball trade tactics.
https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/...090000985.html
We have a very smart and stable genius at the helm. We should have more faith! I have heard that Trump can walk on water and heal the sick, so this is bush league stuff.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
So now that the USPS had a plan in place and was ready to start taking a major role in elections, a court has blocked them again. This time when SCOTUS has to take it up on its merits it will be struck down.
Comment
-
Praise the Lord for activist judges."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
You're a sucker if you actually believe of these antics are about election security.Originally posted by BlueK View PostSo now that the USPS had a plan in place and was ready to start taking a major role in elections, a court has blocked them again. This time when SCOTUS has to take it up on its merits it will be struck down.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ots-rcna594692
Im not holding my breath on SCOTUS doing the right there here.
Comment
-
I understand the sentiment. But like birthright citizenship, the Constitutional issue here is pretty clear: states administer elections and there is no role at all defined for the executive branch, not even by statute. That said, Thomas and Alito have shown they will probably try to find a way to give the middle finger to the Constitution in the service of Trump and to keep their billionaire benefactors happy. But IMO the votes still aren't there among the full 9 to side with Trump on the merits on this one when it comes down to it.Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
You're a sucker if you actually believe of these antics are about election security.
Im not holding my breath on SCOTUS doing the right there here.
Comment
Comment