The June 1

[smokymountainrain]

Perhaps you are right and the medical world is more accommodating in this regard, but it would be the exception rather than rule.

Yes, and the CEO of IHC is a physician, so he'd probably meet with another doc.

[Blueintheface]

I once rode in an elevator with a doctor.

[Sullyute]

While I admit it was a cute touch that she immediately started rocking the sleeveless look after she was told not to wear her garments anymore, it was the first thing many women I know noticed with post-ex Kate. Again, she probably got a high five from the FMH, but it's not playing well with the "moderates."

Hold it, she is not wearing garments any more?! But it is an outward expression of a inward commitment. If Kate isn't inwardly committed then I am off the OW bandwagon.

[Commando]

Hold it, she is not wearing garments any more?! But it is an outward expression of a inward commitment. If Kate isn't inwardly committed then I am off the OW bandwagon.

Don't be so hasty; I bet she's just expressing her outward expression of her inward commitment to the terms set forth in the decision letter.

[Blueintheface]

*Poof* I'm glad you saw the irony in that, CJ.

[LVAllen]

Is anyone aware of someone successfully appealing a church court decision?

Particularly where the one who hears the appeal also happens to be the one initially disciplining the appellant?

[Moliere]

Is it sexist if Kate Kelly is a male nurse?

[RC Vikings]

While I admit it was a cute touch that she immediately started rocking the sleeveless look after she was told not to wear her garments anymore, it was the first thing many women I know noticed with post-ex Kate. Again, she probably got a high five from the FMH, but it's not playing well with the "moderates."

I would like to see a change from the generic term garment to something like LDS underwear, maybe then only the prevs would keep track and report what others were wearing.

[wally]

Is anyone aware of someone successfully appealing a church court decision?

I think that Kelly's hopes hinge on whether or not her church leaders first contacted her husband for permission to arrange the court. If leaders bypassed her husband, then I would think she could get a mistrial.

[kccougar]

I obviously am biased here, but I believe her.
Here's why: if they had really met, why would she bring it up, and then so specifically? It wasn't particularly central to her point (although certainly damning), he was sure to deny it, and it would just make her look like she was lying. In short, it's distracting, and such a strange thing to just fabricate. Putting myself in her shoes, I can't imagine just making something up like that.

In her Tribune interview that's on youtube now, she says in one sentence the Bishop is outright lying about their communication, and then in the very next statement acknowledges that she met with them both in December and in May, exactly as the Bishop's letter states.

[TripletDaddy]

In her Tribune interview that's on youtube now, she says in one sentence the Bishop is outright lying about their communication, and then in the very next statement acknowledges that she met with them both in December and in May, exactly as the Bishop's letter states.

you've become a little too possessed by this topic if you are watching youtube clips. I didnt peg you as part of the podcast crew. No more. snap out of it!

[kccougar]

you've become a little too possessed by this topic if you are watching youtube clips. I didnt peg you as part of the podcast crew. No more. snap out of it!

I was sucked in by the bare shoulders.

[Dwight Schr-ute]

In her Tribune interview that's on youtube now, she says in one sentence the Bishop is outright lying about their communication, and then in the very next statement acknowledges that she met with them both in December and in May, exactly as the Bishop's letter states.

What are the odds that the December "meeting" was tithing settlement?

[kccougar]

What are the odds that the December "meeting" was tithing settlement?

Only if the Stake President typically attends tithing settlement.

[Pelado]

Only if the Stake President typically attends tithing settlement.

Isn't that typical?