Originally posted by The_Tick
View Post
13 Articles of Healthy Chastity
Collapse
X
-
I agree. But what you describe isn't confined to women in the Church except for perhaps the confession part.Originally posted by marsupial View PostI really don't know much about church discipline. I thought it was more to the discretion of the bishop.
I was responding to DNF who was talking about how unlikely it would be for a bishop or YW leader to say "I told you so" after getting raped. I agree. I don't think most bishops or YW leaders would say that.
However, I do think that it is not uncommon for YW who are raped or otherwise sexually-abused to feel guilty, blame themselves and maybe even go through the repentance process with a bishop. This is why sexual abuse should be addressed during these chastity lessons--for both the YW and YM. And why modesty should not be framed in terms of "if you wear that, you're basically asking for it."
And yes modesty has to be framed delicately. What would you think about saying something like "if you wear that you may attract the attention of someone you don't want?""Nobody listens to Turtle."-Turtlesigpic
Comment
-
-
-
I agree with this.Originally posted by nikuman View PostI am very okay with the lesson of "if you dress in this way you are more likely to be viewed as this sort of person". That's just the way things are. That "way" doesn't necessarily include temple garment modesty and my wife and are agreed that we believe that she would dress a bit differently but for aforementioned underwear.
A different issue is the "if you dress like this, you are asking for it" talk. This is when are talking about YM controlling themselves to be clear. At a minimum we are insinuating that girls somehow have some responsibility for young Brigham skipping off to the bathroom an hoping everybody effing knocks. At worst we are saying that it's her fault if she gets date (or otherwise) raped. Both are sad statements that I would call sexist but for the fact that they are insulting to both genders.
I think the real problem is that people mean to say the former and say the latter. Or say the latter and don't understand the implications.
I am very nervous about dealing with this when my daughter hits YW. And my sons when they hit YM as well, as I remember the religious instruction I received on the matter and it was little better. Except for one bishop who was clear that sex was awesome and we should just wait a bit for the awesomeness."Nobody listens to Turtle."-Turtlesigpic
Comment
-
-
No, of course not. But we spend a lot of time talking about chastity with our youth and we need to take some time to talk about abuse, how to recognize it and what to do if it happens. Also, this "she was asking for it," attitude is prevalent in circles outside of the church too.Originally posted by Surfah View PostI agree. But what you describe isn't confined to women in the Church except for perhaps the confession part.
And yes modesty has to be framed delicately. What would you think about saying something like "if you wear that you may attract the attention of someone you don't want?"
In all honesty, I am not totally on board with the modesty lessons period. I don't understand why I can't wear sleeveless dresses or skirts more than a few centimeters about my knee. And living in this hot and humid climate, a nice strappy sundress is not immodest, it's a necessity! Obviously, my garments keep me from wearing what I want. But I wouldn't make my daughter abide by the garment dress code. She can wear shorts and tank tops and sundresses when the weather and activities make such outfits appropriate.What's to explain? It's a bunch of people, most of whom you've never met, who are just as likely to be homicidal maniacs as they are to be normal everyday people, with whom you share the minutiae of your everyday life. It's totally normal, and everyone would understand.
-Teenage Dirtbag
Comment
-
Right on all accounts. Also, I don't think modesty is a list of "appropriate" clothing, or at least it shouldn't be taught that way. For the most part, it seems to be.Originally posted by marsupial View PostNo, of course not. But we spend a lot of time talking about chastity with our youth and we need to take some time to talk about abuse, how to recognize it and what to do if it happens. Also, this "she was asking for it," attitude is prevalent in circles outside of the church too.
In all honesty, I am not totally on board with the modesty lessons period. I don't understand why I can't wear sleeveless dresses or skirts more than a few centimeters about my knee. And living in this hot and humid climate, a nice strappy sundress is not immodest, it's a necessity! Obviously, my garments keep me from wearing what I want. But I wouldn't make my daughter abide by the garment dress code. She can wear shorts and tank tops and sundresses when the weather and activities make such outfits appropriate."You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge
Comment
-
-
I'm assuming that would make you a strapless bra to DDD's sports bra?Originally posted by RC Vikings View PostI fully support you with this."You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge
Comment
-
SHW and I subscribe to your modesty theory and I have in fact already had discussions with my daughter about it. She - at the age of nine - has already come back from church with modesty concepts we disagree with, along the lines of your list of clothes. In addition to all of the other things it does, it can teach our kids that neighbors who don't wear garment-appropriate clothes and yet are appropriately dressed are immodest and sinful by implication. That is a message I would very much like to avoid having to counter again.Originally posted by marsupial View PostNo, of course not. But we spend a lot of time talking about chastity with our youth and we need to take some time to talk about abuse, how to recognize it and what to do if it happens. Also, this "she was asking for it," attitude is prevalent in circles outside of the church too.
In all honesty, I am not totally on board with the modesty lessons period. I don't understand why I can't wear sleeveless dresses or skirts more than a few centimeters about my knee. And living in this hot and humid climate, a nice strappy sundress is not immodest, it's a necessity! Obviously, my garments keep me from wearing what I want. But I wouldn't make my daughter abide by the garment dress code. She can wear shorts and tank tops and sundresses when the weather and activities make such outfits appropriate.Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
-
-
My youngest sister is a little fundamentalist in training. My mom especially pushes the list of "modest" clothing. During a girl's weekend in Portland last year, I pointed to a dress in a window I thought was cute. It had a poofy skirt and was sleeveless. My sister reproachfully told me, "That's unmodest. You shouldn't like unmodest things." (sigh)Originally posted by nikuman View PostSHW and I subscribe to your modesty theory and I have in fact already had discussions with my daughter about it. She - at the age of nine - has already come back from church with modesty concepts we disagree with, along the lines of your list of clothes. In addition to all of the other things it does, it can teach our kids that neighbors who don't wear garment-appropriate clothes and yet are appropriately dressed are immodest and sinful by implication. That is a message I would very much like to avoid having to counter again."You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge
Comment
Comment