13 Articles of Healthy Chastity

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mormon Red Death
    BYU Delenda Est
    • Nov 2008
    • 8077

    #61
    Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
    I also agree with Drum that people who do inappropriate things in those interviews are the exception. Still, they exist, and Drum and I know one of them. .
    you obviously are referring to haddow

    Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using Tapatalk
    "Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum

    "And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla

    Comment

    • Sullyute
      a day late/a dollar short
      • Jul 2010
      • 3308

      #62
      Originally posted by Eddie Jones View Post
      In fact, the best advice I got was from my then future FIL who said to my then fiancee and me right after we got married "You will have the rest of your life to enjoy being intimate so waiting four more months shouldn't be a very long time." That was great advice and put things into perspective at the time.
      You had to wait 4 months after you got married to be intimate?!

      Seriously speaking I think that was some sage advice that your FIL gave. And it was probablly more effective when it said it to both of you together. Being frank and open about these types of things is what helps the youth and everyone involved.
      "Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism" - Joseph Smith Jr.

      Comment

      • byu71
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 22070

        #63
        I don't know about now days, but I don't ever remember a Bishop asking me about masterbation and definitely my parents never talked about it. Funny, but I do vividly remember hearing you would go blind if you did, but from who and when, I don't remember. Might have even been my ex after she had been to relief society.

        Anyway, I have a pretty good idea on how to stop young boys from playing with their thinger. Have them sit there and watch some freckled faced, freckled donger, red headed 14 year old yanking on that freckled thing. I doubt many will even see the kid get to the end. They will get up and leave the room before he finishes.

        Note: I don think freckle faced red heads are cute, just not if they are playing with their pud.

        Comment

        • shoganai
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 513

          #64
          Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
          A commenter on the FMH article linked to this slate.com article comparing how we present sex to American teenagers as compared to a number of European countries. It's presented as a slideshow, and compares 15 or so advertisements/posters.
          The problem I've always had with this argument is that it assumes the only bad things about kids having sex are pregnancy and disease.

          Those just happen to be the most visible problems, but they're definitely not the only ones - and maybe not even the most serious ones.

          Comment

          • woot
            Resident Science Cop
            • Nov 2008
            • 5531

            #65
            Originally posted by shoganai View Post
            The problem I've always had with this argument is that it assumes the only bad things about kids having sex are pregnancy and disease.

            Those just happen to be the most visible problems, but they're definitely not the only ones - and maybe not even the most serious ones.
            Namely...

            Comment

            • RobinFinderson
              Banned
              • Nov 2008
              • 10548

              #66
              Originally posted by woot View Post
              Namely...
              Hell.

              Comment

              • RobinFinderson
                Banned
                • Nov 2008
                • 10548

                #67
                Originally posted by woot View Post
                Namely...
                Also, premarital sex is a gateway activity to hard drugs. I have never met a person who was addicted to hard drugs who didn't try premarital sex first.

                Comment

                • marsupial
                  Mississippi Queen
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 3678

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
                  Canned peaches has true significance, broccoli however can only reference the mangled mess that happens to a wrestlers' ears. I do recall a pretty good BYU female hoopster named Jen Leitner who missed a game with an earache and then was suspended the next week. Not exactly a hole I would want to hit but to each their own, I suppose.
                  I couldn't find a reference to "broccoli and peaches," but I learned that broccoli is a euphemism for marijuana. I already knew what peaches were a euphemism for.
                  What's to explain? It's a bunch of people, most of whom you've never met, who are just as likely to be homicidal maniacs as they are to be normal everyday people, with whom you share the minutiae of your everyday life. It's totally normal, and everyone would understand.
                  -Teenage Dirtbag

                  Comment

                  • Moliere
                    One man.....one pie
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 27806

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Sullyute View Post
                    You had to wait 4 months after you got married to be intimate?!

                    Seriously speaking I think that was some sage advice that your FIL gave. And it was probablly more effective when it said it to both of you together. Being frank and open about these types of things is what helps the youth and everyone involved.
                    I thought that was doctine. Is it not?????? j/k I can't believe I made that error.

                    It was great advice and perfect timing on his part. He's a good man. Very orthodox, but a good man.
                    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                    Comment

                    • shoganai
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 513

                      #70
                      Originally posted by woot View Post
                      Namely...
                      I think the argument has been made both scientifically and otherwise that sex outside of a marital relationship carries emotional risks that are quite substantial and complex - particularly with teens.

                      And, I think LDS should understand as well as anyone how the physical and emotional are tied directly to the spiritual.

                      Comment

                      • woot
                        Resident Science Cop
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 5531

                        #71
                        Originally posted by shoganai View Post
                        I think the argument has been made both scientifically and otherwise that sex outside of a marital relationship carries emotional risks that are quite substantial and complex - particularly with teens.

                        And, I think LDS should understand as well as anyone how the physical and emotional are tied directly to the spiritual.
                        I guess so, although I don't know how science could show something so vague and subjective. I don't think anyone is disputing that sex strengthens emotional attachments. How does this relate to your point about there being things worse than disease and unwanted pregnancy?

                        Comment

                        • shoganai
                          Junior Member
                          • Feb 2010
                          • 513

                          #72
                          Originally posted by woot View Post
                          I guess so, although I don't know how science could show something so vague and subjective. I don't think anyone is disputing that sex strengthens emotional attachments. How does this relate to your point about there being things worse than disease and unwanted pregnancy?
                          I don't think it's really so vague or difficult to connect diagnosed emotional issues to relationship and lifestyle habits.

                          To your second question, I think emotional and spiritual illness can have a much greater affect on happiness and quality of life than an STD (or even a pregnancy) can. That doesn't mean it always does, but it definitely can.

                          Comment

                          • woot
                            Resident Science Cop
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 5531

                            #73
                            Originally posted by shoganai View Post
                            I don't think it's really so vague or difficult to connect diagnosed emotional issues to relationship and lifestyle habits.

                            To your second question, I think emotional and spiritual illness can have a much greater affect on happiness and quality of life than an STD (or even a pregnancy) can. That doesn't mean it always does, but it definitely can.
                            From the perspective of there being no such thing as spiritual illness, I agree that much damage can be caused from feelings of guilt associated with sex, or from being indoctrinated to think that sex is naughty. The subject of this thread demonstrates that quite well, I think.

                            Still not sure what you mean by "emotional illness" though.

                            Comment

                            • UtahDan
                              *
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 14496

                              #74
                              Originally posted by shoganai View Post
                              The problem I've always had with this argument is that it assumes the only bad things about kids having sex are pregnancy and disease.

                              Those just happen to be the most visible problems, but they're definitely not the only ones - and maybe not even the most serious ones.
                              I guess that is sort of hard to quantify. Still, this paragraph is arresting:

                              In both Europe and America, the age at which most people start having sex is 17. But that's where similarities about teen sexuality begin and end. Teen pregnancy rates in the United States are three to six times higher than in Western European countries. This means that one out of every three American teenage girls becomes pregnant at least once before she reaches the age of 20. (Even poor countries like Algeria, Sri Lanka, China, and Estonia have lower teen birth rates than we do.) The gap between Europe and the United States for sexually transmitted diseases is even greater—gonorrhea and chlamydia rates are 20 to 30 times higher here than in the Netherlands, for example.
                              That is an awful lot of harm that is happening in our country. You seem to be saying that it is worthwhile having that much unwanted pregnancy and venereal disease because it produces more emotionally and spiritually healthy kids on balance (amongst the ones who don't suffer that). Is that basically right?

                              Comment

                              • shoganai
                                Junior Member
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 513

                                #75
                                Originally posted by woot View Post
                                Still not sure what you mean by "emotional illness" though.
                                It's a broad term to be sure. Just shooting from the hip, I think I would define it as depression, anxiety, anger, or other negative emotions that are severe enough to affect quality of life. Some of these can be biological and beyond human control, but I believe a lot of them can also be symptoms of lifestyle and behavior.

                                Comment

                                Working...