Tweet
Originally posted by wuapinmon
View Post
-
Maybe I shouldn't have thought old Barry Robbins, DO extreme when he encouraged us to stop eating t-bone."Don't expect I'll see you 'till after the race"
"So where does the power come from to see the race to its end...from within" -
Why can't we just get the symbols tattooed and be fine with it all?
Sent from my Sprint EVO 4GAin't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
These guys could take care of that:Originally posted by falafel View Post
http://www.masonicink.com/Comment
-
Too painful. Too permanent. I say bag the garments, we can just wear our CTR rings and call it good.Originally posted by falafel View PostWhat's to explain? It's a bunch of people, most of whom you've never met, who are just as likely to be homicidal maniacs as they are to be normal everyday people, with whom you share the minutiae of your everyday life. It's totally normal, and everyone would understand.
-Teenage DirtbagComment
-
His wasn't the variant or new variant, it was sporadic. Eat all the meat you want, save the kuru causing kind.Originally posted by doctorcoug View Post"Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --SolonComment
-
I just wanted to weigh in and say that I don't mind wearing garments. Religious issues aside, I prefer wearing some sort of undershirt. Also, men's undergarments have moved closer towards garments than away. The boxer brief looks very much like a garment bottom. I'm pro garments.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpicComment
-
Sure, I think a lot of guys feel that way about wearing garments themselves.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
It's the garment for females that is terrible, especially when you consider how the garment interacts with the bra and the multiple bunching layers -- I don't blame women for getting annoyed with that.Comment
-
Well, I have heard and read more than a few guys talk of garments creeping up all over their legs. This doesn't happen to me. I wonder if it has to do with the material.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpicComment
-
Probably has more to do with your bird legs. I don't have this problem, either.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostPrepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss
There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach FinstockComment
-
I've mentioned this before, but I think it bears repeating -- women do NOT need to wear their bra OVER the garment. It is not necessary to wear the garment against the skin to count. That is a tradition that some people follow just as some people don't remove the garment for sports activities.Originally posted by CardiacCoug View PostComment
-
Most of the time, especially at work, I agree with you. The exception is during summer leisure times, when I want to wear shorts and don't particularly like multiple layers of shirts. Even though I get the "short" garment bottoms, this can be troublesom.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostComment
-
It should probably surprise no one that, in a church that is lead by men, garments work pretty well with the business uniform. For one, wearing a form-fitting undershirt with a collared shirt just seems to look better, and it protects the collared shirt. And two, briefs can make noticeable lines under slacks, and boxers can look kind of bunchy, since there is a lot of extra material. The garment, in contrast, is tighter than boxers, and its hems drop down low enough so that they are usually only visible when you are sitting.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
I'd be willing to bet that once women get the priesthood, and start accepting callings in priesthood leadership positions, there will be some major changes to women's garments.Comment
-
Great, so we only need to wait another 100 years.Originally posted by RobinFinderson View PostAin't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
Exactly. Comparing that outfit to the current garment is no different than comparing the current garment to the original garments worn by JS. I think you could include all necessary markings and not detract from their symbolism at all compared to the current variety. In addition, the smallness and lightness of the "new garments" would make them more wearable for females and result in greater orthodoxy. Basically, we've gone from long sleeve to cap sleeve, why would tanktops be verboten? We've gone from ankle length to thigh length. Why would (what would you call that anyway) butt length be a tragedy?Originally posted by marsupial View PostMaybe something like this? I don't think there'd be too many complaints.
Comment
-
I'm sure that that top would also be more comfortable for women suffering relief society arm (a condition where there is excess flab hanging from a woman's upper arms as if she had been cooked in the microwave for a bit and all of the tissue came detached from the bone and now just hangs there).Originally posted by marsupial View PostMaybe something like this? I don't think there'd be too many complaints.
Comment
Comment