Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LDS Garments: Why I Want Out of This Club

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
    Based on a discussion thread recently at FMH, I'm not so sure that everybody is told to wear garments under their bras. Whatever ends up being a person's prevailing belief on this topic honestly seems to depend on whoever was the temple matron the day the individual received her endowment. Some people in the FMH discussion were told to definitely wear it under and others weren't told anything at all.

    For something that reflect every day life as much as garment-wearing, you'd think there's be more uniformity in this regard.
    Honestly, I think the preoccupation with the subject is the problem. I never had anyone tell me how or when to wear my underwear prior to my endowment. I don't need anyone to tell me how or when to wear my underwear now. Some people are really obsessed with this topic and constantly tell others what to do on the subject. I am just not interested in whether the Bishop/S.P./M.P./or G.A. think I should wear my underwear to play ball. For the record, I don't ever wear my garments to the beach, gym, track, or anywhere else I might want to take off my shirt.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
      Well said. Moreover, you and Mrs. LA Ute are kindred spirits.
      In an Anne of Green Gables kind of sense?
      "You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge

      Comment


      • Originally posted by nikuman View Post
        I'm pretty good about it, I think. I don't have any qualms answering the question, at any rate.
        I think the extreme behavior and attitudes of some members and leaders is one of the reasons why we have to (1) read the TR interview questions exactly as written, and (2) read the "Wearing the Temple Garment" guidance to every interviewee. Too much whackyness. (Is that a word?)
        “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
        ― W.H. Auden


        "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
        -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


        "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
        --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
          In an Anne of Green Gables kind of sense?
          Sorry, that's a chick book. I haven't read it.
          “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
          ― W.H. Auden


          "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
          -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


          "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
          --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
            Based on a discussion thread recently at FMH, I'm not so sure that everybody is told to wear garments under their bras. Whatever ends up being a person's prevailing belief on this topic honestly seems to depend on whoever was the temple matron the day the individual received her endowment. Some people in the FMH discussion were told to definitely wear it under and others weren't told anything at all.
            My wife was told she could wear her bra under her garments by a temple matron. Being a [now former] TV reporter she always seems to ask a lot of questions. She also asked if they had something in more of a french cut for the bottoms too.
            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
              Based on a discussion thread recently at FMH, I'm not so sure that everybody is told to wear garments under their bras. Whatever ends up being a person's prevailing belief on this topic honestly seems to depend on whoever was the temple matron the day the individual received her endowment. Some people in the FMH discussion were told to definitely wear it under and others weren't told anything at all.

              For something that reflect every day life as much as garment-wearing, you'd think there's be more uniformity in this regard.
              Interesting. Well.... maybe a priesthood correlation committee will take care of it soon. I guess they're probably not too aware of the issue, though .

              If they pick bra on the outside, all the inside wearers will be pissed. If they pick bra on the inside, they'll have to really take on the design problem 'cause wearing the garments over the bra makes the marks visible through T-shirts.

              On another sort of related topic... the single, older women working in the temple may really be in need of some sort of correlated leadership. Seriously. I've had temple workers in the locker room chat with me about their beliefs in eternal polygamy and which of the famous married men in the church they're planning on becoming a plural wife to in the afterlife. It can be really creepy. I know they're disappointed 'cause they feel like they need to be married and all. I feel sad for them. But whispering their testimony of the marriage they'll get in the next world is a bit much. It's at times like these that it's easy to understand why a worldwide organization needs standards and rules everyone follows.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                Sorry, that's a chick book. I haven't read it.
                Psssh. Anne rocks. (Though, incidentally, my book club opted to read Anne of Green Gables rather than some suggestion I and other made of The Interpreter of Maladies or The Name of the Rose because we have a few "tenderer" souls in the group. Anne is really a bit juvenile for a group that has four JDs and one doctoral student in modern English literature.)

                I was just wondering why you think we're "kindred spirits." My thoughts about garments?
                "You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
                  Psssh. Anne rocks. (Though, incidentally, my book club opted to read Anne of Green Gables rather than some suggestion I and other made of The Interpreter of Maladies or The Name of the Rose because we have a few "tenderer" souls in the group. Anne is really a bit juvenile for a group that has four JDs and one doctoral student in modern English literature.)

                  I was just wondering why you think we're "kindred spirits." My thoughts about garments?
                  Yes, as well as other things you have said. I think the two of you would get along famously.
                  “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                  ― W.H. Auden


                  "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                  -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                  "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                  --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
                    Psssh. Anne rocks. (Though, incidentally, my book club opted to read Anne of Green Gables rather than some suggestion I and other made of The Interpreter of Maladies or The Name of the Rose because we have a few "tenderer" souls in the group. Anne is really a bit juvenile for a group that has four JDs and one doctoral student in modern English literature.)

                    I was just wondering why you think we're "kindred spirits." My thoughts about garments?
                    You bypassed Umberto Eco? Double ugh.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by KillerDog View Post
                      Honestly, I think the preoccupation with the subject is the problem. I never had anyone tell me how or when to wear my underwear prior to my endowment. I don't need anyone to tell me how or when to wear my underwear now. Some people are really obsessed with this topic and constantly tell others what to do on the subject. I am just not interested in whether the Bishop/S.P./M.P./or G.A. think I should wear my underwear to play ball. For the record, I don't ever wear my garments to the beach, gym, track, or anywhere else I might want to take off my shirt.
                      To me, garment wearing is something that people can do "perfectly" like the temple recommend version of the Word of Wisdom (most people aren't living the Word of Wisdom as actually written) and the single-ear-piercing thing. Some people end up hanging their personal testimonies on their personal "perfect" observance of these things, and judge others as unrighteous or disobedient for not following it the way they do. These outward observances have very little to do with being a good person or one's personal relationship with Christ, but some people put a lot of stock in them.
                      "You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                        You bypassed Umberto Eco? Double ugh.
                        I weep for the future of our book club. Eco is one of my favorite authors. Because we have a few people who don't like to read "yucky things" or "things that make them uncomfortable" (the reason we didn't end up reading The Kite Runner), we end up reading books like Anne of Green Gables. The other suggestion proffered by one of the sensitive souls was the Chronicles of Narnia (a good read . . . when I was 10). Sigh.
                        "You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Mrs. Funk View Post
                          I weep for the future of our book club. Eco is one of my favorite authors. Because we have a few people who don't like to read "yucky things" or "things that make them uncomfortable" (the reason we didn't end up reading The Kite Runner), we end up reading books like Anne of Green Gables. The other suggestion proffered by one of the sensitive souls was the Chronicles of Narnia (a good read . . . when I was 10). Sigh.
                          Cross the old testament off the list too, I suppose.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                            Yes, as well as other things you have said. I think the two of you would get along famously.
                            You should get her to sign up for the board.
                            "You know, I was looking at your shirt and your scarf and I was thinking that if you had leaned over, I could have seen everything." ~Trial Ad Judge

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Rosebud View Post
                              Interesting. Well.... maybe a priesthood correlation committee will take care of it soon. I guess they're probably not too aware of the issue, though .

                              If they pick bra on the outside, all the inside wearers will be pissed. If they pick bra on the inside, they'll have to really take on the design problem 'cause wearing the garments over the bra makes the marks visible through T-shirts.
                              When my wife went through the temple for the first time, the matron was a former RS General President and she told her that either way worked.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by falafel View Post
                                This sounds similar to the instruction that garments should never touch the floor. Some (like me) have been told this by parents, others by temple workers, and others have never heard that at all.
                                Yeah, I was told this but I don't believe it's authoritative. I do believe it's superstitious.

                                Originally posted by Gidget View Post
                                Agreed. It is really hard for me. It doesn't make me lose my testimony because it isn't a Gospel issue, it is a Church issue. I love the Gospel, but sometimes I feel squashed by the Church as an organization. Anyway, yeah, comment box would be cool. Hopefully by the time your and my girls get bigger they will have some kind of system for such concerns.
                                A very useful distinction that I often use to deal with my frequent moments of cognitive dissonance.

                                Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                                I think the extreme behavior and attitudes of some members and leaders is one of the reasons why we have to (1) read the TR interview questions exactly as written, and (2) read the "Wearing the Temple Garment" guidance to every interviewee. Too much whackyness. (Is that a word?)
                                And am I every thankful that they do this. Garment-wearing standards are officially (and in my view appropriately) very vague. This offers a great deal of latitude, once you eliminate the personal-opinions-presented-as-doctrine.
                                Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X