Why can't a bishop have 4 or 5 counselors?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fusnik
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 4475

    #76
    Indy you are joking, no? PPI's, home teaching, blessings to those in need, trainings with teachers, visits with the missionaries, if you are running an EQP according to the CHOI you need all the help you can get.

    Comment

    • creekster
      It is NOT a monkey!
      • Nov 2008
      • 22661

      #77
      The answer to the question is that bishops can have more than two counselors if necessary. What is necessary is at the SP discretion, I believe.

      My wife is RS prez and has three counselors. She needed this because I have a busy job, a busy calling, kids at home, and the demanding duties of a doyen of CUF, which cannot be underestimated.
      PLesa excuse the tpyos.

      Comment

      • The_Tick
        Made something of myself
        • Nov 2008
        • 7303

        #78
        <redacted>
        Last edited by The_Tick; 02-25-2010, 05:11 PM. Reason: Should have stayed out of it.

        Comment

        • Indy Coug
          Heartless Bastard
          • Dec 2008
          • 18747

          #79
          Originally posted by fusnik View Post
          Indy you are joking, no? PPI's, home teaching, blessings to those in need, trainings with teachers, visits with the missionaries, if you are running an EQP according to the CHOI you need all the help you can get.
          I've been in six EQ presidencies, so no, I'm not joking. Two counselors and a secretary is more than sufficient.
          Everything in life is an approximation.

          http://twitter.com/CougarStats

          Comment

          • mUUser
            Giggity
            • Jul 2009
            • 1142

            #80
            Originally posted by creekster View Post
            My wife is RS prez and has three counselors. She needed this because I have a busy job, a busy calling, kids at home, and the demanding duties of a doyen of CUF, which cannot be underestimated.

            Not to mention interests outside of work & church -- skiing, boating, coaching little league, dog shows, jeepin, playing an instrument, sports message boards and a million other things. Life should largely consist more than just work & church (at least my life should).

            Comment

            • RobinFinderson
              Banned
              • Nov 2008
              • 10548

              #81
              The church should just give women the priesthood, and then simply not extend them any leadership callings in any significant numbers, just like they did with black men. Voila! Problem solved.
              Last edited by RobinFinderson; 02-25-2010, 04:06 PM.

              Comment

              • mUUser
                Giggity
                • Jul 2009
                • 1142

                #82
                Originally posted by The_Tick View Post
                Roseblood,

                Most of the women that I know would never be interested in the least to run the Ward.

                Irrelevant. Most sane men aren't interested in it either.

                Comment

                • LA Ute
                  Receiver of Memory
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 19512

                  #83
                  Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
                  Not to be disrespectful, but this post leaves me thinking you have a narrow view of what leadership is available in a less well-to-do area.
                  No disrespect detected. Sorry, I miscommunicated. I was just speaking of ideals (bishop has many people to delegate to, and does) as opposed to reality (sometimes bishop just does it himself; and, as you suggest, sometimes the luxury of delegating is not there). Our ward is one where everyone has a pretty responsible calling and is never really released, just switched to another similarly responsible calling.

                  I think this is a great idea. When I was growing up, there was a ward in our stake with only one priest so they sent him over to our ward so he could have a better all-around YM experience. Worked out well according to him.
                  We combined YM, YW, and primary in our ward (then-Elder Uchtdorf even endorsed the idea when he reorganized our stake). It worked fabulously. I know of many wards where this has been done. It just requires some unorthodox [] re-jiggering of schedules and commitment from leaders. If anyone ever wants to see the blueprint we used, let me know. We stopped when boundaries were revised and the two wards that were combining no longer were in the same building. The YM and YW still combine for activities on Tuesday night, and that still works great.
                  Last edited by LA Ute; 02-25-2010, 04:09 PM.
                  “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                  ― W.H. Auden


                  "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                  -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                  "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                  --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                  Comment

                  • LA Ute
                    Receiver of Memory
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 19512

                    #84
                    Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                    The church should just give women the priesthood, and then simply not extend them any leadership callings in any significant numbers, just like they did with black men.
                    I can tell it's been a while since you went to church in the L.A. area.
                    “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                    ― W.H. Auden


                    "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                    -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                    "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                    --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                    Comment

                    • Rosebud
                      sledgirl
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 1363

                      #85
                      Originally posted by The_Tick View Post
                      Roseblood,

                      Most of the women that I know would never be interested in the least to run the Ward.

                      Of the very few that would like to, I have come to the following conclusions:

                      1. There is a difference between thinking you would like to do it, and then having to do it. It would be handled just as inefficiantly as it currently is.

                      2. They served missions. Now let me say this....not all Sister Missionaries were man haters. I served around a few that were really good Sisters. I can think of <5 Sisters in my 2 years that would fit into the really "good" category. (In that same thought though....I didn't think very highly of most of the Elders in my mission either. I was never a leader because I don't like being told what to do. If it sounds stupid, I will let you know and I wont follow it = No leadership for me.)

                      Putting it mildly....the only women in my current ward that would like to run it are turbo bitches that would have church attendance down to <10 because of their current "my way or the highway" attitude that they run their current orgs.

                      so do you think that women who want equality are man-haters? am I a man-hater? do you think that women who have leadership skills are bitches? am I a bitch?

                      i'm not saying women are more efficient than men. i'm saying that if women held the priesthood there would be at least twice as many priesthood holders per ward. men who are at work all day could come home and spend time with the kids. women could get away for a few hours to do some service outside of the home. i think everyone would benefit.

                      Comment

                      • RobinFinderson
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 10548

                        #86
                        Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                        I can tell it's been a while since you went to church in the L.A. area.
                        Where is there a black bishop in a primarily white area?

                        Edit: I made my original point with TIC, but this is an interesting question... yes, the church has black leadership in black neighborhoods, but what about black bishops in white neighborhoods? Does it happen? Has anyone ever seen it happen? I haven't.

                        Comment

                        • Moliere
                          One man.....one pie
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 27926

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Rosebud View Post
                          so do you think that women who want equality are man-haters? am I a man-hater? do you think that women who have leadership skills are bitches? am I a bitch?

                          i'm not saying women are more efficient than men. i'm saying that if women held the priesthood there would be at least twice as many priesthood holders per ward. men who are at work all day could come home and spend time with the kids. women could get away for a few hours to do some service outside of the home. i think everyone would benefit.
                          I hope and pray that one day you become a bishop.
                          "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                          Comment

                          • Moliere
                            One man.....one pie
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 27926

                            #88
                            Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                            Where is there a black bishop in a primarily white area?

                            Edit: I made my original point with TIC, but this is an interesting question... yes, the church has black leadership in black neighborhoods, but what about black bishops in white neighborhoods? Does it happen? Has anyone ever seen it happen? I haven't.
                            Had one in Rouen France. He was the only black guy in the ward.
                            "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                            Comment

                            • The_Tick
                              Made something of myself
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 7303

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Rosebud View Post
                              so do you think that women who want equality are man-haters? am I a man-hater? do you think that women who have leadership skills are bitches? am I a bitch?

                              i'm not saying women are more efficient than men. i'm saying that if women held the priesthood there would be at least twice as many priesthood holders per ward. men who are at work all day could come home and spend time with the kids. women could get away for a few hours to do some service outside of the home. i think everyone would benefit.
                              No chance.

                              We would be right where we are now. But this time it would be "my wife is spending too much time in her calling and not enough time with me and the kids."

                              So a woman can't be:
                              Bishop
                              Bishopric
                              Exec Sec
                              Ward Clerk
                              Financial Clerk
                              HPGL
                              EQP
                              YMP
                              SS Pres. (not sure on this one)
                              Dad

                              A man can't be:
                              RS Pres
                              YW Pres
                              Primary Pres
                              Mom

                              I don't really see it as an equality issue. In my experience, when a Sister starts talking about attaining the Priesthood she is power hungry. "I would be a good Bishop", "I could run this more effectively".

                              Just so you know...I have it, recieve no benefits for having it, and don't want any of the callings that are "designated for men only" other than being Dad.

                              Comment

                              • LA Ute
                                Receiver of Memory
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 19512

                                #90
                                Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                                Where is there a black bishop in a primarily white area?
                                I don't know of any, but that means nothing. Since when is representation at the bishop level the standard? My (formerly lily-white) stake has or has had black EQPs, black high councilors, Asian bishops, adult convert bishops (and entire stake presidencies who joined the church as adults), you name it. It's all about demographics. Leadership reflects the population of the ward or stake. I am pretty sure that if you controlled for statistical presence of a certain ethnic group, there is no discernible discrimination. Not in areas like L.A. or New York.
                                “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                                ― W.H. Auden


                                "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                                -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                                "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                                --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                                Comment

                                Working...