Wow, the Deseret News gave it four stars. I think I may need to check it out.
Thor
Collapse
X
-
-
I liked it. Fun movie to see"Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum
"And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla
Comment
-
Would you take a 9-year-old to it? I like comic book movies. Danimal doesn't, but I've got a handsome 9-year-old I could take.Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View PostI liked it. Fun movie to seeWhat's to explain? It's a bunch of people, most of whom you've never met, who are just as likely to be homicidal maniacs as they are to be normal everyday people, with whom you share the minutiae of your everyday life. It's totally normal, and everyone would understand.
-Teenage Dirtbag
Comment
-
How dare you, sir? I grew up reading those comics in the 60s.Originally posted by NorthwestUteFan View PostNot sure what to think. The Thor comics = incredibly boring, Hopefully the movie is better.
“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
-
It's not a 4 star movie, 3 stars IMO. It's not up to the level of Ironman 1, Spider Man 2 and the two Nolan Batman movies, but it's right underneath those movies. Thor is an important Marvel comic book character so they couldn't screw this one up like they did, say, Ghost Rider. Thor's potentially another franchise and he's going to be in The Avengers. I'm still trying to figure out why they didn't put more into the Fantastic Four.Originally posted by venkman View PostWow, the Deseret News gave it four stars. I think I may need to check it out.
The actor who portrays Thor is very good in the role. Natalie Portman proves my long-held thought that women reach their hotness peak starting in their very late 20s and it lasts until their mid 30s.
They have a great cameo from one of the other Avengers mid-way through who's portrayed by a very good actor, you'll know it when you see it.
I didn't understand the spoiler scene after the credits. Maybe someone can enlighten me.Last edited by Color Me Badd Fan; 05-07-2011, 04:21 PM.Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
I really liked it. I can't think of very much I didn't like about it, other than some of the plot resolution. Better than Ironman 2, probably not better than Spiderman 1 (Was spiderman 2 any good? It's been a while). I did recognize the other Avenger just from the video game.Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View PostIt's not a 4 star movie, 3 stars IMO. It's not up to the level of Ironman 1, Spider Man 2 and the two Nolan Batman movies, but it's right underneath those movies. Thor is an important Marvel comic book character so they couldn't screw this one up like they did, say, Ghost Rider. Thor's potentially another franchise and he's going to be in The Avengers. I'm still trying to figure out why they didn't put more into the Fantastic Four.
They have a great cameo from one of the other Avengers mid-way through who's portrayed by a very good actor, you'll know it when you see it.
I didn't understand the spoiler scene after the credits. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I didn't understand the end, either, butSpoiler for my .02:I believe that Loki was either the scientist in disguise or controlling the scientist to get S.H.I.E.L.D.'s secret? The power supply could have been referential to some other Marvel lore, but I am not well versed enough to really say..."I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
Spider Man 2 was the best Spider Man movie. 1 was pretty good, 3 was pretty mediocre. Spider Man 2 is the one with Doctor Octopus. Strangely enough they're rebooting the SPider Man franchise next year after only about five years since Spider Man 3. Also, Sony owns the movie rights so Spider Man will continue to fall outside the sphere of the Marvel Studios self-produced movies that are tying everything together. The same thing is going to happen with the X-Men.Originally posted by Commando View PostI really liked it. I can't think of very much I didn't like about it, other than some of the plot resolution. Better than Ironman 2, probably not better than Spiderman 1 (Was spiderman 2 any good? It's been a while). I did recognize the other Avenger just from the video game.
I didn't understand the end, either, butSpoiler for my .02:I believe that Loki was either the scientist in disguise or controlling the scientist to get S.H.I.E.L.D.'s secret? The power supply could have been referential to some other Marvel lore, but I am not well versed enough to really say...Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
I thought Thor was better than any of the Spider Man movies.Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View PostSpider Man 2 was the best Spider Man movie. 1 was pretty good, 3 was pretty mediocre. Spider Man 2 is the one with Doctor Octopus. Strangely enough they're rebooting the SPider Man franchise next year after only about five years since Spider Man 3. Also, Sony owns the movie rights so Spider Man will continue to fall outside the sphere of the Marvel Studios self-produced movies that are tying everything together. The same thing is going to happen with the X-Men.
It was not as good as the most recent Batman movies or Iron Man.
I think it was as good as Iron Man 2.
It was easier for me to get into the Batman and Iron Man movies because, the way they were depicted, you could actually conceive of a real batman or iron man existing.
Thor is so "out there" in terms of origins. Same with Super Man. Harder for me to get into.
I thought Spider Man sucked. #2 was awful. So, I might not be a great reference for how those stack up.
At the very least, it was a very entertaining movie. Very well done. I'm not a comic book guy, so I can't speak to how "true" it is, but it was entertaining and well made. Natalie Portman melts the screen in a very non-Megan-Fox way. It was a good ride. I saw it with my 6 year old. He liked it, wasn't scared. There was a bit of language but no gore and no sex. I'll probably take my 8 year old and see it again.
I'd give it 3 stars. For me, 4 needs to be an Oscar nominee (or should be on that level).
Solid, solid flik.
Comment
-
Spider Man 2 got 93% positive reviews. So, I think it's you and not the movie.Originally posted by Portland Ute View PostI thought Thor was better than any of the Spider Man movies.
It was not as good as the most recent Batman movies or Iron Man.
I think it was as good as Iron Man 2.
It was easier for me to get into the Batman and Iron Man movies because, the way they were depicted, you could actually conceive of a real batman or iron man existing.
Thor is so "out there" in terms of origins. Same with Super Man. Harder for me to get into.
I thought Spider Man sucked. #2 was awful. So, I might not be a great reference for how those stack up.
At the very least, it was a very entertaining movie. Very well done. I'm not a comic book guy, so I can't speak to how "true" it is, but it was entertaining and well made. Natalie Portman melts the screen in a very non-Megan-Fox way. It was a good ride. I saw it with my 6 year old. He liked it, wasn't scared. There was a bit of language but no gore and no sex. I'll probably take my 8 year old and see it again.
I'd give it 3 stars. For me, 4 needs to be an Oscar nominee (or should be on that level).
Solid, solid flik.Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
My feelings are the exact same as yours. Spiderman 2 was horrendous and boring. yeah we get it. You are troubled about being a superhero.... blah blah blahOriginally posted by Portland Ute View PostI thought Thor was better than any of the Spider Man movies.
It was not as good as the most recent Batman movies or Iron Man.
I think it was as good as Iron Man 2.
It was easier for me to get into the Batman and Iron Man movies because, the way they were depicted, you could actually conceive of a real batman or iron man existing.
Thor is so "out there" in terms of origins. Same with Super Man. Harder for me to get into.
I thought Spider Man sucked. #2 was awful. So, I might not be a great reference for how those stack up.
At the very least, it was a very entertaining movie. Very well done. I'm not a comic book guy, so I can't speak to how "true" it is, but it was entertaining and well made. Natalie Portman melts the screen in a very non-Megan-Fox way. It was a good ride. I saw it with my 6 year old. He liked it, wasn't scared. There was a bit of language but no gore and no sex. I'll probably take my 8 year old and see it again.
I'd give it 3 stars. For me, 4 needs to be an Oscar nominee (or should be on that level).
Solid, solid flik."Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum
"And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla
Comment
-
You're insane. Spider-Man 2 is possibly the greatest comic book superhero yet made. I have to keep that caveat in there because the greatest comic book inspired movie is clearly The Incredibles.Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View PostMy feelings are the exact same as yours. Spiderman 2 was horrendous and boring. yeah we get it. You are troubled about being a superhero.... blah blah blah
I enjoyed Thor quite a bit. I like the big gamble that Marvel took in trying to build a cinematic universe with interweaving stories and characters. It seems to be paying off so far. I was thoroughly surprised that Thor was as good as it was. I was of the opinion that it would be pretty much impossible to get an audience to buy into the whole concept but they did a great job jumping between Earth and Asgard and walking a fine line between Lee/Kirby melodrama and lighthearted adventure. Just like the best Thor comics.
As for the final scene,Spoiler for end of credits:The item held by Nick Fury that interests the disguised Loki is called a Cosmic Cube. It's basically an immensely powerful MacGuffin used in a lot of Marvel stories. It can shape reality to the possessor's wishes and so usually acts as a big plot driver as villains try to acquire it and heroes try to stop them. In the comics, mischief caused by Loki was actually the instigating factor that led to the formation of The Avengers superhero team, so it looks as if they may take that route in the movies as well.Kids in general these days seem more socially retarded...
None of them date. They hang out. They text. They sit in the same car or room and don't say a word...they text. Then, they go home and whack off to internet porn.
I think that's the sad truth about why these kids are retards.
--Portland Ute
Comment
-
Sorry, it just wasn't a compelling character. Maybe the 70s and 80s were more 'evolved' than the 60s, in terms of entertainment options. I never liked Thor as much as Batman, Spidey, Superman, Wolverine, or (for some strange reason) Beast.Originally posted by LA Ute View PostHow dare you, sir? I grew up reading those comics in the 60s.
Hopefully the movie is entertaining and the characters are interesting.
Comment
Comment