There are probably enough lawyers on the board to be interested in an issue I think the Supreme Court will have to settle:
Namely, that we no longer know what counts as obscenity.
The first two criteria of Miller vs. California are about "community standards" and "State law." These seem impossible in a world with smart phones, texting, the Interweb etc.
The third criterion of Miller makes sense to me in terms of my own decision making. I avoid any work that, when taken as a whole, lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
Instead of feeling shame over watching some underwater undulations in Splash!, maybe you all should be avoiding Jaws: The Revenge and Batman and Robin.
Namely, that we no longer know what counts as obscenity.
The first two criteria of Miller vs. California are about "community standards" and "State law." These seem impossible in a world with smart phones, texting, the Interweb etc.
The third criterion of Miller makes sense to me in terms of my own decision making. I avoid any work that, when taken as a whole, lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
Instead of feeling shame over watching some underwater undulations in Splash!, maybe you all should be avoiding Jaws: The Revenge and Batman and Robin.

Comment