Originally posted by Goatnapper'96
View Post
Do you like Max?
Collapse
X
-
-
BYU was ahead in the first quarter and had a chance to go up 14-0 but choked and missed the FG attempt. Things went downhill from there. Further, check out the average TOP on Tulsa scoring drives. They kept giving the ball back to BYU's offense in a hurry. TOP was decidedly in BYU's favor and the issue wasn't the offense. The issue with the coaching staff was either the inability to develop a scheme on the fly to deal with what Tulsa was doing - something BYU had never seen before, or the issue with the coaching staff was the inability to effectively communicate to the defense how to implement the quickly developed scheme. I love and adore Mendenhall as a head coach and think he is much better than the pussy fanbase at BYU deserves, but adjusting on the fly is not his strongpoint, IMO.Originally posted by Hallelujah View PostThe point is, if your defense sucks, as the OC, keep the ball out of the other team's offensive hands. You can control that. You can't control suckiness.
What was our avg. yard per running play at Tulsa? Again that only works if you are ahead and I don't recall if BYU was ever ahead.Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
-
Coach: Safeties, stop biting so hard on the play action fakesOriginally posted by Goatnapper'96 View PostBYU was ahead in the first quarter and had a chance to go up 14-0 but choked and missed the FG attempt. Things went downhill from there. Further, check out the average TOP on Tulsa scoring drives. They kept giving the ball back to BYU's offense in a hurry. TOP was decidedly in BYU's favor and the issue wasn't the offense. The issue with the coaching staff was either the inability to develop a scheme on the fly to deal with what Tulsa was doing - something BYU had never seen before, or the issue with the coaching staff was the inability to effectively communicate to the defense how to implement the quickly developed scheme. I love and adore Mendenhall as a head coach and think he is much better than the pussy fanbase at BYU deserves, but adjusting on the fly is not his strongpoint, IMO.
Safeties: OK, coach.
[Safeties bite on play action, get beat on deep route]
Coach: Safeties, stop biting so hard on the play action fakes
Safeties: OK, coach.
[Safeties bite on play action, get beat on deep route]
Coach: Safeties, stop biting so hard on the play action fakes
Safeties: OK, coach.
[Safeties bite on play action, get beat on deep route]
Comment
-
-
I don't really know. I tend to think the only way to trully judge a head coach is in the overall performance, wins and losses. Compartmentalizing his individual weaknesses or strengths in various components is fun, but the dude's job is to win games and not give warm fuzzies to Non-Sequitar or anyone else. IMO, given the resources at his disposal and the limitations affiliated with BYU I think he is one hell of a head coach.Originally posted by JohnnyLingo View PostIs it fair to expect great coaches to have this ability?
Part of what makes BYU so good is execution. I think to be really good at the adjustment game one is likely to lose some ability to execute. I don't pretend to know what the balance should be, other than to evaluate the end result.Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
-
Great coaches are defined by how often they win, not by the reason that they lose. I think that when you win double digit games for 3 straight years you are well on your way to being a great college football coach. My bar might be set too low, but I spend most of my time at the office pontificating about bullshit I know nothing about. Hypocrisy is not my strongsuit!Originally posted by USS Utah View PostIf he's losing games because he can't make adjustments, can he be a great coach?Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
-
"Simply pursuing operational effectiveness while adhering to an obsolete strategy is a formula for failure."
-- Vice Admiral Arthur K. Cebrowski, USN & John J. Gartska
Simply trying to execute better while adhering to a flawed game strategy is a formula for losing.Last edited by Flattop; 08-19-2009, 10:18 AM.Col. Klink: "Staff officers are so clever."
Gen. Burkhalter: "Klink, I am a staff officer."
Col. Klink: "I didn't mean you sir, you're not clever."
Comment
-
-
-
Then take that into account by looking at the style points. Just because your talent is better than others doesn't mean you're going to win games. Look at circa 1980s-1990s USC.Originally posted by JohnnyLingo View PostWhat if you win because your talent is head and shoulders above that of your opponents?
Comment
-
Recruiting is part of coaching the college game. People can bitch and moan about Lute Olsen, but by my definition he was one hell of a great college basketball coach.Originally posted by JohnnyLingo View PostWhat if you win because your talent is head and shoulders above that of your opponents?Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
-
What if a coach piles up blow-out wins against a weak schedule but loses the few games against good teams because he can't make adjustments?Col. Klink: "Staff officers are so clever."
Gen. Burkhalter: "Klink, I am a staff officer."
Col. Klink: "I didn't mean you sir, you're not clever."
Comment
-
At a military institution far superior* to the one that developed that pollock you quote they frequently taught that a less well developed plan violently executed will usually bring better results than a better plan poorly executed.Originally posted by USS Utah View Post"Simply pursuing operation effectiveness while adhering to an obsolete strategy is a formula for failure."
-- Vice Admiral Arthur K. Cebrowski, USN & John J. Gartska
Simply trying to execute better while adhering to a flawed game strategy is a formula for losing.
At the end of the day the way to evaluate the effectiveness of the different approaches is easily done. At least with respect to college football coaches. Check out the win and loss records.
* I would think that most educated and intelligent people would agree with me and Forbes Magazine.Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
-General George S. Patton
I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
-DOCTOR Wuap
Comment
Comment