Originally posted by TheAzzuri
View Post
Heaps
Collapse
X
-
So are we convinced Lark is really that bad? That's a sincere question, because I have no idea how good Lark is. He could be Andrew Luck or he could be Brett Engemann for all I know. .I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
-
It seems reasonable to assume he's terrible because he hasn't sniffed the field despite the two guys ahead of him being mediocre or worse. I have to trust the coaches at least that much.Originally posted by smokymountainrain View PostSo are we convinced Lark is really that bad? That's a sincere question, because I have no idea how good Lark is. He could be Andrew Luck or he could be Brett Engemann for all I know. .
Comment
-
I agree somewhat, but...some guys are gamers, some guys just get it done in practice. The coaches have only seen Lark in practice and based on what I've heard about Lark in practice he was even pretty good there anyway. If he's terrible, why did they recruit him? And if they used bad judgement in recruiting him, it seems reasonable that they are using bad judgement in who they are choosing to play the games.Originally posted by woot View PostIt seems reasonable to assume he's terrible because he hasn't sniffed the field despite the two guys ahead of him being mediocre or worse. I have to trust the coaches at least that much.I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
Comment
-
That's not really how it works. Heaps was the #1 QB and he blows. Lark was a high-3-mid-4-star guy, so clearly a lot of people thought he had potential. Nevertheless, I don't actually trust the judgment of these coaches, so you may be right that Lark needs a shot. Lark has a strong arm, has been in the program longer than either of the QBs getting PT, and could potentially be a game-control style QB for us. I'll state again for the record that I would prefer some combination of Nelson and Lark next year to give Heaps the best chance of developing before his eligibility runs out. If Heaps doesn't want to redshirt and threatens to transfer, all the more reason to not play him.Originally posted by smokymountainrain View PostI agree somewhat, but...some guys are gamers, some guys just get it done in practice. The coaches have only seen Lark in practice and based on what I've heard about Lark in practice he was even pretty good there anyway. If he's terrible, why did they recruit him? And if they used bad judgement in recruiting him, it seems reasonable that they are using bad judgement in who they are choosing to play the games.
Comment
-
I think this is all I'm saying. Here's what we know:Originally posted by woot View PostThat's not really how it works. Heaps was the #1 QB and he blows. Lark was a high-3-mid-4-star guy, so clearly a lot of people thought he had potential. Nevertheless, I don't actually trust the judgment of these coaches, so you may be right that Lark needs a shot. Lark has a strong arm, has been in the program longer than either of the QBs getting PT, and could potentially be a game-control style QB for us. I'll state again for the record that I would prefer some combination of Nelson and Lark next year to give Heaps the best chance of developing before his eligibility runs out. If Heaps doesn't want to redshirt and threatens to transfer, all the more reason to not play him.
1. Heaps isn't getting it done.
2. While Nelson has heart and toughness, he can't throw the ball.
I think that is enough reason to throw Lark in there and see what he can do. He has the physical tools and was good enough in HS that he should get an opportunity on a team without another decent option at QB.I'm like LeBron James.
-mpfunk
Comment
-
Heaps = J.D. McCoy
Nelson = Matt SaracenAs I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
Fail isn't quite right. Probably more of a C grade. Heaps is pretty much dead on for J.D. McCoy. Nelson as Saracen is a bit of a stretch, I'll admit that. Saracen actually had the ability to throw the ball. However, the Nelson long completion on the last drive was not that far off from Saracen's heave at the end of episode 1.Originally posted by MarkGrace View PostYou get the same score as Sizzle last night: a big FNFail.As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
No. This is the worst part of the analogy.Originally posted by mpfunk View PostFail isn't quite right. Probably more of a C grade. Heaps is pretty much dead on for J.D. McCoy. Nelson as Saracen is a bit of a stretch, I'll admit that. Saracen actually had the ability to throw the ball. However, the Nelson long completion on the last drive was not that far off from Saracen's heave at the end of episode 1.So Russell...what do you love about music? To begin with, everything.
Comment
-
It's the coaching. Keith Price was a low BCS, mid-major recruit. Look how he's doing compared to Heaps.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
-
2010, out of 116 quarterbacks
#38 Jordan Wynn: 139.9
#98 Jake Heaps: 116.2
2011, out of 119 quarterbacks
#81 Jordan Wynn, 123.2
#113 Jake Heaps, 97.7
Both quarterbacks have had their QB rating drop by about the same percentage, about 10-15% drop from the previous year.
Comment
-
His rib injury from last season was described as being pretty serious. Maybe it took a few months to heal?
Comment
-
Hmmm weird. There was some post on CB not that long ago being about Jake having some undisclosed issues over the summer.
But that's very odd - I mean - we never heard about him not practicing did we? So what was the restriction?Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī
It can't all be wedding cake.
Comment
Comment