In a vacuum, I have no problem with the matchup with Colorado. It would be a fun game and it would be entertaining to see how the teams stack up. But I don't like the precedent it sets, i.e. "hey, every year when the B12 only gets 1 team into the playoff, we'll have some great B12 v B12 matchups to throw into our meaningless non-playoff bowls". I've been saying it for 20 years--any bowl game that isn't directly tied to a route to the national championship is meaningless. The players see it as a free trip, the programs see it as a financial benefit, the fans see it as bragging rights, but in the end, it's meaningless.
It definitely felt that way when the BCS selected the 1 v 2 title game--every other bowl was meaningless. If felt even more that way when the system was changes to select 4 teams for the playoff, and now I think it's going to feel even moreso for the teams left out of the 12 team playoff. In the era of NIL and opting out, I just dont' think these are going to be good games.
My hope is that this leads to a 24 team playoff, because that's really the only way to keep postseason games meaningful.
It definitely felt that way when the BCS selected the 1 v 2 title game--every other bowl was meaningless. If felt even more that way when the system was changes to select 4 teams for the playoff, and now I think it's going to feel even moreso for the teams left out of the 12 team playoff. In the era of NIL and opting out, I just dont' think these are going to be good games.
My hope is that this leads to a 24 team playoff, because that's really the only way to keep postseason games meaningful.
byufan4ever

Comment