Originally posted by Eddie
View Post
Where the B-12 was better than the P-12 was leadership. The reality was, outside of the SEC and B-10, there is only a finite amount of media dollars to be had. Yomark outflanked the P-12 by moving up his negotiations well ahead of schedule. This locked up a healthy chunk of that $$, leaving the everyone else to scramble. By doing that he financially stabilized his conference in a way that the P-12 commissioner did not. The reality is that, once Texas/OU and USC/UCLA left, the value of the remaining teams was on par with each other. Yomark recognized that value and moved quickly to be the conference to secure his share of that ahead of the other two conferences (ACC, P-12). If the Pac-12 had taken the lead and secured their media contract first, they would have survived and been the group taking in schools instead of the other way around.
Honestly, the 4 corner schools come out of this in far better shape than the rest of the P-12. OSU and WSU are in a world of hurt. Stanford and Cal are on an island, struggling to find a direction. Oregon and Washington are locked into a diminished share (roughly the same that Utah, ASU, UofA, and CU will get) for an unstated length of time. They will be competing against schools with double the resources, and will be wasting a healthy chunk of that money on travel expenses. Of the teams, on the move, they are the big losers.
Comment